1 / 14

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING . June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources. Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th. Evaluations.

christeenw
Download Presentation

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

  2. Evaluations • 1. We are looking to pilot software (Stages) next year in 8 schools. The schools were chosen from members of the Admin and/Teacher Evaluation Committee and those that expressed interest. • 2. The committee will continue to meet and will make recommendations including a weighted rating formula.

  3. Danielson Recommendations • Highly Effective Rating: at least 2 to 3 domains highly effective with the remaining effective • Effective: No more than one domain minimally effective with the remaining effective or highly effective

  4. Minimally Effective: two or more minimally effective. • Ineffective: Any standard rated ineffective

  5. 3. Evaluations and Relatives (1st cousin, child, brother, etc). Please contact HR for support. • 4. Standards for effective teaching rubric and faculty meetings

  6. Danielson I-observation technique • 1. Verbatim, scripting of teacher or student comments • 2. non-evaluative statements of observed teacher and student behavior. • 3. Quantitative Data, time on task, assessment etc. • 4. Environmental observations

  7. Evaluator Rater Reliability • We will view two or three clips. We will have a table discussion. • We will vote using poll everywhere.com - You will get one vote per table. • Please justify your reasons using the chart paper • We will then have a whole group discussion as we do a share out.

  8. Rate the Lesson • Based on what you will observe of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot) • Highly Effective • Effective • Minimally Effective • Ineffective

  9. 7th Grade Language Arts Class Objective: Students will learn comprehension techniques and think aloud strategies Teacher models using historic pictures to access background knowledge First Clip

  10. First Clip • Teacher purposefully points out tricky words via modeling comprehension techniques • Students think aloud for their peers using what she calls a fish bowl technique • During this technique she provides guided instruction where needed.

  11. Observations • What are the strengths? • What are the weaknesses? • What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions? • What recommendations might you have?

  12. 2nd Clip • Kindergarten teacher • She will explain the lesson plan implementation and the objective • Objective: Students will count the number of objects in a box and write that number. • Students will also put objects in order on a number line. • Students will fill in a blank with out a number line.

  13. 3rd Clip • 8th Grade Algebra Class • Objective: Students will factor and solve problems using a generic rectangle.

  14. 37607 • Highly Effective 150416 • Effective 150421 • Minimally Effective 150422 • Ineffective 150468

More Related