1 / 4

Conference Reviewing Best Practices

This conference session features panelists from renowned universities and research institutions discussing effective reviewing practices, ethical issues, alternative reviewing models, and more. Gain valuable insights to improve your reviewing process and become a top-notch reviewer. Don't miss the opportunity to engage in discussions and learn from experts in the field.

christopherjackson
Download Presentation

Conference Reviewing Best Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conference Reviewing Best Practices

  2. Panelists • Marie desJardinsUniversity of Maryland Baltimore County • Ariel FelnerBen-Gurion University, Israel • Kristian KerstingFraunhofer IAIS and University of Bonn, Germany • Michael LittmanBrown University • Ashish SabharwalIBM Research

  3. Prepared Remarks • Marie desJardinsThe reviewing process • Kristian KerstingIn dubio pro reo: Giving the benefit of the doubt • Ashish SabharwalJunior reviewers: Making your review more relevant • Ariel FelnerHow deep the reviewing process can get: A case study with a AAAI-13 paper • Michael LittmanEthical issues for submitters and reviewers

  4. Discussion Time! Possible Topics... • Effective reviewing practices • Handling “comment period” dynamics and author feedback • “Growing into” becoming an SPC / organizing committee member • Ethics of author/reviewer conflicts, duplicate submissions, etc. • Alternative reviewing models: Pros and cons • Scoring systems • Junior vs. senior reviewer perspectives • Delegating to subreviewers: When and how • ... ???

More Related