80 likes | 263 Views
Subsidence in Food Processing & Training Center, Sitapur Constructed by U.P. Project Corporation. Worst Performing District : Sitapur. Department had refused to take possession. Contd…. Worst Performing District : Sitapur. Gopal Yojna (Rs. 129.25 lakhs).
E N D
Subsidence in Food Processing & Training Center, SitapurConstructed by U.P. Project Corporation Worst Performing District : Sitapur • Department had refused to take possession Contd…
Worst Performing District : Sitapur Gopal Yojna (Rs. 129.25 lakhs) Objective:AI, Vaccination, balanced diet & better fodder speciesCoverage:10 blocks (20 Nyay Panchayats) 40 Rearer Group/Nyay Panchayat; 1 Gopal Group/blockRevolving FundRs. 10000/- per Rearer Group (Rs. 80 lakhs)Rs. 50000/- per Gopal Group (Rs. 5 lakhs) Only 5% loan to be given at a time No further loan was allowed till the previous one is returned Failure to payback the first loan prevented loan disbursement to any other member, rendering the huge amount of revolving fund (Rs. 80.75 lakhs) unutilized. Consequently, not only this ambitious scheme failed measurably, but also blocked a substantial amount of RSVY fund.
Major Bottlenecks • Lack of Proper Planning • Lack of community involvement • Overburdened staff • Delayed release of funds • Frequent transfers of key functionaries • Lack of inter-sectoral coordination
Lessons Learnt (Do’s & Don’ts) • Don’ts • Assigning works to non-specialized agencies • Use of inexperienced NGOs • Transfers of key functionaries during project period
Lessons Learnt (Do’s & Don’ts) • Do’s • Need-based participatory planning • Community involvement at all stages • Use of professional agencies in planning • Dedicated staff for RSVY type programs • Improved co-ordination at all levels
Lessons Learnt (Do’s & Don’ts) • Do’s • Earmarking separate maintenance funds • Provision of social audit • Involvement of only competent NGOs • Proper MIS/record keeping