510 likes | 523 Views
This comprehensive overview delves into juvenile justice in America, focusing on delinquency prevention strategies, such as early intervention, mentoring, school programs, and community involvement. It examines the processes involved in juvenile justice today, from police involvement to corrections and parole. The historical and philosophical roots of the juvenile justice system are also discussed, highlighting the evolution of approaches and challenges faced. A valuable resource for understanding and addressing juvenile delinquency effectively.
E N D
Juvenile Justice in America SOC 106 Part 11: Delinquency Prevention and Juvenile Justice Today
Delinquency Prevention - control or repression a. Public health approach - primary: preventing disease / injuries - secondary: risk for offending - tertiary: work with adjudicated offenders b. Early prevention - influencing “risk factors” - cognitive development / child skills training / family support - home based programs
(1) Improve parenting skills - develop a closeness - effective intervention (2) Parent training c. Preschool - ages 3 to 5 - higher rate of high school completion - more years of education - lower school dropout rate 2. Delinquency prevention in teenage years
a. Mentoring - nonprofessional volunteers - young people at risk - supportive / non-judmental - role model b. Methods for delinquency prevention (1) School programs - critical social context (2) Engaging parents - reduce negative peer influence
(3) Job training - improve chances - Job Corps - YouthBuild U.S.A. (4). Juvenile Justice Today - justice process - crime occurs (a) Police involvement - investigation - juvenile contact
(b) Police discretion - verbal / report / arrest (c) Minorities over-represented - police target (d) System too lenient - parents - diversion (5) Responsible for all children - missing / runaway / delinquent
(a) Preventive measures - DARE / GREAT / SRO (b) Community involvement - truancy enforcement - “Neutral Zone” b. Courts - judge / prosecutor / defense / probation (1) Juvenile court - separate system / superior court
(a) Civil / criminal - civil court system (b) Bound by court rules - by statute (c) Variety of legal matters - more extensive (d) Civil in nature - evolving into adversarial - adult court
(e) Major differences - no jury / guardian ad litem - court terminology (2) Jurisdiction - 18 years of age (a) Probation - 21 years of age (b) Loss of jurisdiction - violent offender
c. Corrections - GHC Juvenile Detention Center - Dept. of Juvenile Rehabilitation (DSHS) (1) Function: - protect public - remove offenders (a) Dual function - hold accountable - provide: education / training / personal life skills
(2) Probation - common disposition (a) Back into community - restrictions (b) Local time - no time (3) Parole - state facility - serve time
The system a. First contact: police (1) 72% calls for service - crime-in-progress - already committed (2) 28% observed by police - patrol - task force - sting operation
b. Police on scene - initiate arrest - begin investigation (1) Officer discretion - crime (a) Verbal warning / release (b) Refer to prosecutor - report - evidence
(c) Release with warning - parents / other adult - take home / pickup (d) Arrest - to station - advise rights - interview - release / detention (2) Police process - most: no written policy
- up to officer (a) 18 + - issue citation / release - not juveniles = arrest / release (b) “Mind-set” of officer - teach lesson - lock up - no services (c) Statistics show:
- majority: informal disposition - 55%: community resources (deferred) - 45%: court referral (3) Detention process - held = detention hearing - release by probation (4) Court process - show cause hearing - fact finding hearing
(5) Dispositional hearing - state / local time - probation Historical / Philosophical Roots • Integrated network - agencies / personnel a. Not system = process - not smooth flow - antagonism / conflict / differing opinions
(1) Juvenile network - processed through (a) Various public / private agencies - law enforcement - court (prosecutor / defense) - corrections - community-based programs (b) Reasons for conflict - police - enforcement / detention
- charges filed (c) Probation - release home - recommend lesser charge (d) Prosecution - refuse to charge - lesser charge / divert (e) Judge - release juvenile
- no time (f) Corrections - punishment oriented - social service oriented - ignore actions (g) Community-based programs - different perspectives - social / psychological intervention - family intervention - education / work programs
b. Juvenile process - different state to state - philosophy / laws / action taken (1) Agencies vary - Department of Corrections - Department of Juvenile Services - Department of Juvenile Rehabilitation - Department of Social Services - Department of Family Services (2) 1990s: society turns hostile
(a) No longer: “wayward youth” - “errant troublemaker” (b) Do not look at reason - one-parent family - educational failure - no employment (2) View as: - serious deviants (a) World of adult criminal - violent / well-armed / gangster
(b) Do what they want - don’t care (3) Justice system response: - more police / institutions / treatment / prevention (a) Laws passed - no smoking laws - “Becca Bill” - truancy - curfew
(b) Violent offender: age 16 / 17 - tried as adult • History of juvenile justice a. Code of Hammurabi - 4000 years ago (1) Babylonian king - written laws - control actions: adult / juvenile - “Lex Talionis”: an eye for an eye
(b) Ancients: youth problems - runaways - disown parents (2) 2000 years ago - Greeks / Romans: written law - control masses (a) Roman law - distinguished juveniles / adults - age of responsibility - before age 7 / not accountable
(b) Civil / canon law - civil: criminal law - canon: church law (c) Major influence on world’s legal system - English law - American law (3) 800 years ago: British Common law (a) Common practice used by judges
- written down - other / future judges know (b) Replaced civil / canon laws - Henry VIII - divorce / re-marry (c) Distinction between adult / juvenile - under 7: incapable of intent - 7 through 14: had to prove - know right from wrong - form intent
(d) Parens patriae - king: father of all children (4) American juvenile system - similar to English law (a) Age - up to 7 years not form intent - 7 to 12 years: had to prove - 12 and older: could form intent (b) Parens patriae
- state assumed responsibility - enter home / take child - foster care / adoption b. History of juvenile institutions - 1500s, London: crime was rampant - crime up / juvenile gangs (1) Treated youth as adults - police / courts / corrections (a) Adults courts: try youth
(b) Punishment included: - workhouses / apprenticeships - debtor prisons / banishment - torture / death / removal (2) 1600: changes began to occur - educated class (a) Segregating youth - courts and corrections (b) Kept confidential
- avoid shame / stigmatization (c) 1788: separate institutions - “educate and instruct in some useful trade” (d) Causes of delinquency - poverty / lack of education - poor parental guidance • Early American juvenile justice - handled similar to adults
- stocks / prison / banishment / death - indentured servants / military enlistment a. Treated worse other countries - enslaved labor - military service (1) US criticizes - teenagers off to war - Viet Nam (17 yrs / permission) (2) Age of 18 years
- go to war - in adult court - credit cards (a) Cannot legally drink - too immature b. Early 1700s - American colonies (1) Hundreds of juveniles imprisoned - minor acts / major crimes
- disobeying parents / way dressed - criminal acts (a) Adults / juveniles / male / female - all locked up together (b) Treated same in courts / jails - very severely (c) Mid to late 1700s - juvenile gangs - poverty / education / parentless
(2) Early to mid-1800s - juvenile crime continued (a) Public concern growing - justice system trying to solve problem (b) Industrial Revolution - poor / delinquent youth to work (c) Agrarian Work Ethic - sent to work on farms
- solve problem - out of city - farmers: free labor - would learn to change ways (d) Did not solve problem - youth ran away - rural crime rates increased (e) Today: Job Corp (3) Juvenile institutions developed
- deal better with juvenile crime (a) House of Refuge (1825) - New York City (b) Reform School (1845) - Massachusetts (c) Oriented to education / treatment - moving away from punishment (d) Majority were ‘status offenders’
(4) Start of reform / refuge movement - leased out to businesses - learning a trade (a) System failed - crime continued - incorrigibility increased (b) Police / courts / jails failed - did not rehabilitate c. 1860s: reform/refuge institutions
- developed across country / failing (1) By 1875: - most states followed Massachusetts - moved back to punishment (a) Child Savers - end punishment - establish treatment (b) Wealthy / educated class - save delinquent children
- changes in courts / corrections (2) Reasons for delinquency - children could be ‘saved’’ (a) Childhood: a period of savagery - battle of “good vs. evil” - treatment / religion (b) Naturally free spirits - quest of joy / happiness - educated / trained to work
(c) Good children turned bad - urban environment - poverty / crime / single-parent (d) Stuck in ‘psychic arrest’ - periods of tendency toward crime - did not pass / life of crime (3) Juvenile system again: - turned from concept of punishment d. Establishment of juvenile courts
- pressured legislators - separate courts - treat differently - adult crime mentality - both the same (1) Created conflicts - do-gooders vs. hard-liners - Child Savers triumphed (a) Turned to rehabilitation - care / protection / discipline
(b) Ceased to be criminal - ‘child in need’ (c) First step: juvenile justice - “civil” juvenile system (2) First juvenile court - 1899 - Cook County, Illinois (Chicago) (a) Family court - juvenile matters - identify underlying problem
(b) Ways to solve problem - training / education / sterilization • Era of socialized justice - no longer treated as criminals - protection foremost a. 1899 to 1967: - emphasis: obtaining complete picture of delinquent - attempts made to determine appropriate care
- looked at: home environment / schooling / maturity / mentality / work history / criminal history / peer group (1) “Case worker” approach - informality became the rule (a) No prosecutor - no defense attorney - no jury (b) Decision: best for juvenile
- made by participants (c) Judge / case worker / police officer / psychologist (d) Considered guilty - without trial (2) 1920s: case workers became probation officers - do what best for youth - also take into custody
(a) 1940s / 1950s - juvenile crime moderate - “Fabulous fifties” – life easy - employment up / poverty down - crime / poor: inner-city ghettos (b) Children / families structured - assembly line children - typical family (Father Knows Best / Leave It to Beaver) (c) Father worked / mother homemaker
- children go to school - graduate (d) After graduation: - work - college - military b. 1955: Holmes Case - US Supreme Court - not criminal courts - civil actions
(1) Constitutional rights - adults only - juveniles not entitled (a) In detention for any reason - crime / disrespect / runaway (b) Guilt: preponderance of evidence - more likely than not (c) Adult trial: - proof beyond a reasonable doubt
(2) 1960s: - “Terrible Sixties” - crime soared - violent / property (a) Beginning of end: - socialized justice - formal proceedings began (b) Gault vs. Arizona (1964) - changed informality - required legal rights