170 likes | 262 Views
WMS Report TO TAC. January 2007. In Brief . Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR proposal (PRR701) Protocol Discussion by the IMM Retired two Task Forces and created one Discussed Emergency Interruptible load. Working Group Reports CMWG.
E N D
WMS Report TO TAC January 2007
In Brief • Two Working Group Reports • Two Task Force Reports • One PRR proposal (PRR701) • Protocol Discussion by the IMM • Retired two Task Forces and created one • Discussed Emergency Interruptible load
Working Group ReportsCMWG • Third Quarter report on congestion • Review of CSC flow control by operations • Update on Competitive Constraint determination due in January
Working Group ReportsDSWG • Progress report on goals • Status of the PUC work on Demand Side • Issues of LaaR participation in RRS
PRR 701Enabling of Stranded Capacity During Alerts • Concept surfaced during EILP discussions. • Not responsive to TAC & PUC request • WMS supported it on its own merit • Comments filed in support • In the PRS process now
ERCOT Staff Presentations IMM lead discussion on potential market confussion regarding sections 6.4.2(5) RPRS and 6.5.10(10) OOMC
Task Force Reports • Emergency Interruptible Load Task Force (EILTF)
EILTF Background • Sept. 15 – ERCOT proposes Emergency Interruptible Load program • Oct. 6 – TAC charges WMS to develop EIL PRR • Oct. 18 – WMS creates EILTF to develop EIL product as a new Ancillary Service • Oct. 31-Nov. 27 – EILTF or its subgroups (app. 40 participants) meet 10 times to develop draft PRRs creating EILS
WMS Discussion and Action • EILTF presented 4 draft PRRs • Options A and B – capacity models • Options C and D – energy models • Other issues discussed • Tradeoff between low cost and effective participation • Tradeoff between high participation and ease of administration • Need for EILS vs. other approaches
WMS Discussion and Action • Motion to focus on energy-only design • Motion carried – 75.6% in favor • Motion to file Option D • Motion carried – 86.3% in favor • WMS directed EILTF to file PRR 703, but did not endorse PRR 703.
PRR 703 • EILS created as new EECP Step 3 • Loads volunteer to interrupt during emergency conditions for an offer price • EILS deployed after LaaRs but before firm load shedding • Last EILS offer cleared sets MCPE for both loads and resources • EILS offers subject to system HCAP • EILS dispatched via hotline call to QSEs
PRR 703 • Qualification / Performance • Must be able to communicate one-minute usage data to ERCOT • Must be able to reduce load within 10 minutes to 95% of the offered amount struck by ERCOT • Must have IDR meters • Offers in 1MW increments only
PRR 703 • Qualification / Performance • Must be able to communicate one-minute usage data to ERCOT • Must be able to reduce load within 10 minutes to 95% of the offered amount struck by ERCOT • Must have IDR meters • Offers in 1MW increments only
PRR 703 • Implementation • EILTF envisions largely manual implementation process to accommodate ERCOT’s requested April 1 effective date • EILS stack can be composed on spreadsheet • MCPE can be manually set following EILS deployment • EILS deployment is by phone call
Other PRRs • PRR 702 filed by supporters of capacity-model design developed in EILTF but rejected by WMS • ERCOT PRR to be filed soon • ERCOT expressed concern whether stakeholders will approve either EILS option • ERCOT expressed concern whether either EILS option can be implemented by April 1.
ERCOT EILS PRR • EILS procured by ERCOT in 4-month increments (2-month initial period) • Provides capacity payment • Paid as bid, no clearing price • Propose cap of $X/yr for total EILS cost • Some load flexibility to schedule unavailability
Jan. 18 PRS Preview • PRR 701 • Alternative/supplement to EILS? • PRR 702 • Capacity model • PRR 703 • WMS-endorsed energy only model • ERCOT PRR • Bilateral contract capacity payment model