1 / 28

Anna Collins Court Moor George Knights Court Moor Neil Chance Brookfield

Anna Collins Court Moor George Knights Court Moor Neil Chance Brookfield Roger Hutchin Brookfield. Embedding Best Practice through Professional Development. LAS Conference – July 18 th 2011 Court Moor School / Brookfield Community School. Where are you now?

Download Presentation

Anna Collins Court Moor George Knights Court Moor Neil Chance Brookfield

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anna Collins Court Moor George Knights Court Moor Neil Chance Brookfield Roger Hutchin Brookfield

  2. Embedding Best Practice through Professional Development LAS Conference – July 18th 2011 Court Moor School / Brookfield Community School

  3. Where are you now? • The Court Moor and Brookfield models • Examining and discussing some of the ideas • What can you take away from this session?

  4. How do you mainly share best practice? INSET Days Twilight sessions Departmental meetings Other

  5. Who decides the content for the INSET in your school? Senior Leadership Team Subject Leaders External trainers Staff consensus Students Others

  6. Who generally leads the Learning & Teaching INSET in your school? Senior Leadership Team Subject Leaders External trainers A mix of the above Others

  7. Do you know who the bestteachers are in your school? • Yes • No • Unsure

  8. Who are the best teachers in your school? Senior Leaders Subject Leaders Others

  9. Are you making best use of your best teachers for professional development? • Yes • No • Unsure

  10. LTG @ Brookfield

  11. Learning & Teaching Group Outcomes Consistency across and within departments; student use & understanding of targetlanguage – nature of progression; spreading practice: innovators–core–foundation

  12. Learning & Teaching Group Process (1) • Identify weaknessesthrough Staff Skills Audit (now BlueSky) – Action Research Groups • Provide L&T workshops– department requests & visits • Lead school INSET– ‘Good to Outstanding’, ‘G&T’, ‘Differentiation’, ‘Learning to Learn’….

  13. Learning & Teaching Group Process (2) • Participation in Whole School Observations- supportoffered to staff/departments • Identify bestpracticeacross the school: - central collectionof ideas (Teachers Pool) • ‘best practice’ videosrecorded in-house • ‘bring ‘n’ buy • regular sharing of ‘best practice’ ideas (‘Gems’) via email (=‘Gemails’!)

  14. Reasoning behind Court Moor’s focus on AfL: What does the school need to do to improve further? Ofsted 2009 Reduce further the proportion of teaching that is satisfactory through more explicit and focused use of the outstanding teaching in the school to model best practice. In particular, to improve: the engagement of students through directed questioning and targeted learning activities the feedback to students on their current work the level of challenge for the most able students.

  15. Implementing AfL requires changing teacher habits: Teachers “know” most of this already The problem is not a lack of knowledge That’s why telling teachers what to do doesn’t work Experience alone is not enough - if it were, then the most experienced teachers would be the best teachers—we know that’s not true (Hanushek, 2005) People need to reflect on their experiences in systematic ways that build their accessible knowledge base, learn from mistakes, etc. (Bransford, Brown & Cocking, 1999

  16. The Court Moor CPD model = Research & Developments groups Historically worked in collaborative Research groups Emphasis is on collaboration across the school, as well as within departments What are the benefits of engaging in cross- c curricular dialogue?

  17. That’s what R&D Groups are for: R&D Groups contradict teacher isolation R&D Groups offer a steady source of support for teachers They grow expertise by providing a regular space, time, and structure for that kind of systematic reflecting on practice They facilitate sharing of untapped expertise residing in individual teachers They build the collective knowledge base in a school

  18. Structure for R&D Group meetings: Every month R&D Group meetings should follow the same structure and sequence of activities: Activity 1: Introduction & housekeeping (5 mins) Activity 2: How’s it going (25 minutes) Activity 3: New learning about AfL (30 minutes) Activity 4: Personal action planning (25 minutes) Activity 5: Summary of learning (5 minutes)

  19. Key Aspects of each meeting: Personal Action Plan Peer Observation (Records of the meetings and/or action taken are useful for forming evidence for performance management).

  20. Two Year Programme

  21. Learning & Teaching Fortnight: Purpose: To engage in a dialogue about the learning that occurs within your classroom Aim: Every teacher is observed twice and carries out a minimum of four observations over two weeks

  22. L & T Fortnight Logistics: All meetings cancelled for a fortnight – this is the priority Not an official observation – no records kept Not Ofsted graded All observations carried out in pairs Pairs observe two 20 mins sectionsof different lessons All meet immediately after school in staffroom for discussion about findings Focus is on Learningand opening up discussion Pairs allocated randomly – mixture of experience & subjects OVERWHELMINGLY SUCCESSFUL!

  23. Embedding good practice: Planning Placemat The planning placemat encourages you to react according to your learners needs Itforcesyou to check/assess for learning Teachers need to be brave enough to leave the SoW Could be used specifically for a target student

  24. ProposedPlan KS3 Planning Placemat Link to HSW milestones: What Happened BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS: BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS: Topic ______________ Focus ____ Group ___ BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS: BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS: BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS: BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS: BLOCKS : NEXT STEPS:

  25. Student Feedback, key points: Majority of lessons have learning intentions –either written or verbally. Students felt strongly that they wanted the objectives explained so that they knew what to do and how to achieve them. Refer back to them in lesson. (Tasks are explained) Modelling used in more subjects, particularly DT, ICT, MFL, Science, Geography, Art. Some like Music, DT and English use level descriptors or criteria (but these are not always easy to understand) Students much more aware of the purpose of techniques such as wait time, no hands up and whiteboards. Random name generators still work! Other techniques such as thumbs up/traffic lights only useful if the information is being used in a formative way APP impact clearer when discussed Many liked verbal feedback in lesson where points/criteria explicit, whilst walking round class. This was also evident in fact that some commented on the fact that they wanted time to focus on comments when books marked. (Even discussion!)

  26. Where does Court Moor go from here? Growing Powerful Learners AfL/PLTs/4 Rs etc. Continued through R&D groups next year

  27. Have you found anything today you can take away with you? • Yes • No

More Related