200 likes | 287 Views
Referencing the Italian qualifications to EQF State of play. Bruxelles 25-26 September 2012. The EQF implementation in Italy. 2003-2007: First phase – Start up in implementing EQF concepts and approach .
E N D
Referencing the Italian qualifications to EQFState of play Bruxelles 25-26 September 2012
The EQF implementation in Italy 2003-2007: First phase – Start up in implementing EQF concepts and approach. • So called “National Committee” withMinistryofLabour, MinistryofEducation & University, Regions and social partners • ReformofUniversitybased on credits • Reformof the 1° & 2° cycleofEducation and first regulations • 2008-2012: Second phase – Development • newcurriculafor 1° and 2° cycleofeducation and forinitial VET (3 years and 4 yearscourses) based on LOs • reformof the Istruzione e Formazione Tecnica Superiore (IFTS and ITS paths). Thesepaths are based on unitsofcompetences (UC) and credits (ECVET) • establishment of the Repertorio nazionale of the qualificationsfor the IVET coursesbased on LOs. Qualificationsissuedby the regions, with a nationalrecognition (agreement 19/01/2012) • Agreement Stato Regioni (19 April 2012) established the “National Certification system of the competences, anywhereacquiredwithin the Apprenticeship” • Adoptionof the National Plan on QualityAssurance; establishment ofnewevaluationsystemsforEducation system and University
Updating the Italian process: a new phase • Law 92/2012 so-calledFornero’s law : «the labour market reform in a growthperspective» • This law set up: «a national public certificationsystem» • Art. 4 comma 51…[ in coherence with the Europan Union strategynationalpolicies are set up, with agreement state-regions and the Social partnerssupport, …aimed at recognitionofknowledge, skills and competencesanywhereacquiredboth at personal and professionallevel …..; • comma 58 nationalcriteria for validation of non formal and informallearning • comma 58/e creditsfor educational and vocational training progression and permeabilitybetweenpaths and systems • comma 64, set up of «the national public certificationsystem of the competences» • comma 67, set up of a nationalregister of qualifications and degreesbased on standardsapprovedand easilyaccessible for individuals and institutions • ………..
Stages’ summary of the referencing process in Italy • In 2009 ISFOL wasappointed as EQF National Coordination Point (NCP Italy) by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. • Since the beginning of 2009 a Technical Group (TG) has been working on the referencing process • Since 2011 Regions were involved in the process, through their technical committee called “Technical Coordinating Authority”; Social Partners participated as well, involved in the main working sessions • Italy intends to submit its Referencing Report on next December 2012, after a its formal approval by the competent authorities • TG is composed of experts from: • Ministry of Labour and Social Policies; • Ministry of Education, University and Research; • Department of UE Policies; • ISFOL – NCP.
The referencing process – how we worked • The TG has: • carried out a mapping of the Italian Qualifications Systems on the basis of the EQF key concepts; • shared referencing choices and opportunities of further inclusion of regional qualifications with the representatives of the national institutions and the Regions and through the involvement of social partners; • the result is the current • Referencing Report • Last May began the consultation with the international experts that provided valuable feedback for presenting the Italian referencing process in the European context; • the national consultation began last July until August 17th
Structure of the national Report Section 1 General description of different educational and vocational training systems and sub-systems Section 2 Mapping of those qualifications issued within the systems and sub-systems analyzed in section 1 Section 3 Referencing Framework along with the analysis of the European criteria as well as of the methodologies and procedures adopted
Referencing process: start up • Document “Criteria and procedures for referencing National qualifications levels to the EQF “ carried out by the EQF Advisory Group with 10 criteria and procedures outlined for referencing - “process” criteria - “technical” criteria • Referencing – already set for EQF levels 6.7.8 – for those qualifications referred to the Qualifications Framework of the European Higher Education Area (Bologna Process) • Referencing the National Qualifications to the EQF levels. Even if those qualifications are not organized in a national framework based on levels, though they present clear correlations and can be inserted in progression routes From Europe From national context
Referencing: methodologies and procedures adopted • First stage of Referencing in the current Report: • referencing ALL formal national public qualifications (Ministry of Education) and qualifications based on agreements between State and Regions, consistent with Learning Outcomes approach • referencing based on an exhaustive relation among qualifications and technical analysis of consistency among Qualification systems and EQF level descriptors (analysis based on descriptive elements useful to the level’s setting: profile, skills/abilities/competences descriptors, etc..) • contribution of Regions in order to analyze the EQF descriptors with particular reference to the descriptor "competence“ • The Second stage willbeaimed at : • referencingthoseregionalqualifications (based on LO) notincludedwithinState-Regions Agreements. EachRegionwillbedirectlyinvolved in the referencingprocess of the regionalqualificationsas the role of competent authority. • referencing of those qualifications titles related to regulated professions.
The impact of the referenced qualifications * 1° & 2° cycleofeducation, initialvocationaleducation, highereducation, technicalhighereducation - figuresreferredtoyear 2010
Consultation process of the Report The consultation process: - Consultation with international experts : As required from the criterion 7 of the EQF Advisory group document, experts from different countries and different work environments have been involved (Richard Curmi – Senior Manager Malta Qualification Authority; Claudia Gelleni – Senior Manager at CIEP France; Jean Philippe Restoueix – Official of the European Council and member of the EQF Advisory Group; Father Friedrich Bechina – Responsible for the international relations of the Holy See – Vatican State; Adi Kahani – Civil servant at ENIC Israel). - National public consultation: On line survey targeted to a wide public of national stakeholders, social partners, educational and vocational training actors, citizens.
Consultation with international experts • Web meeting on the 24th of May 2012: delivery of the Report and guidelines useful for evaluation; • Workshop in Rome on the 13th of June 2012. • Key issues for evaluation and discussion: • “Quality” of the Report: capacity to make more transparent and to improve comprehension of the Italian system in the European context (legibility, clarity and completeness of the document). • “Quality” of the Referencingprocess: clarity and transparency of the referencing framework ("quality" of procedural choices and methodological arguments used for referencing). • Remarks and suggestions:opinions, weak and strong points and suggestions for improvement .
International experts’ feedback (1) • “Quality” of the Report: very clear description of the system at all levels and in all of its cycles. • The experts suggest to clarify the political point of view of the Report as well as the relations between State and Regions on the educational issues.
International experts’ feedback (2) • 2.“Quality” of referencing:clearmethodological and procedural choices for referencing. The examples of Italian qualifications referenced to the EQF in the annex are useful and understandable. • In order to improve the section: • the relation with the Qualifications Framework of the Bologna Process should be more explicit; • the section on quality assurance should be widened; • the Italian answers to the 10 criteria and procedures formulated by the Advisory Group should be included; • referencing qualifications to the EQF levels 1 and 2 should be added.
International experts’ feedback (3) • 3. Remarks and suggestions: • qualifications of those regions that are further along in the process should be included in the Report; • a glossary should be enclosed to the Report as an annex; • a more explicit involvement of social partners should be desirable; • a description of further developments concerning the referencing process in Italy after the presentation of the Report to the Advisory Group should be added.
National public consultation • Goals – share contents of the Report aswellasgetremarks and suggestions on the Report itself and on the referencingprocessfrom: • Educational and vocational training mainactors and users; • Social partnersaswellasrepresentativesoflabour market and enterprises; • scientific community and experts; • citizens. • Termsofinvolvement: • From the 12th of Julyto the 17th of August a survey on the web sitesoftheMinistry of Labour, Ministry of Education, ISFOL, Department of UE Policies.
National public consultation • 150 questionnairesproperlyfilled in • Accordingto the 90% of participants the Referencing Report to EQF clearlydescribes the Italian educational and vocational training system.
National public consultation • Most of the participants guess that Referencing Framework as well as procedural choices and methodological arguments (section 3 of the Report) are clear and understandable.
June-Sept. 2012 Road map Improving the content of the Report according to the international experts’ feedback and development of the related annex National consultation Processing results of the national consultation and optimization of the Report Sept. 2012 Updating to the Advisory Group on the referencing process in Italy Approval of the Report by the State – Regions Conference Nov. 2012 Dec. 2012 Final presentation of the Italian Referencing Report to the Advisory Group