1 / 34

Hinterland

Hinterland. Workshop on Work Package 3 Kai Dahme VBB Verkehrsverbund Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH (PP02). Contents. Preparing Vorderland-Hinterland-Co-operations First experiences Examples from different Project Partners Problems that occurred

cleary
Download Presentation

Hinterland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hinterland Workshop on Work Package 3 Kai Dahme VBB Verkehrsverbund Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH (PP02)

  2. Contents • Preparing Vorderland-Hinterland-Co-operations • First experiences • Examples from different Project Partners • Problems that occurred • Recommendations for getting Vorderland-Hinterland-Co-operations started • Discussion

  3. Where are we? • All Project Partners have started work in WP3 • Identification of potentials • Very different approaches (topics, ranges and target groups) • Difficulties in contacting Vorderland institutions • Difficulties in awareness raising within the Hinterland

  4. Experiences of PP 01 (Havelland-Fläming) • Various ideas for networks between Hinterland and Vorderland: • Regional marketing • Tourism • Partnerships • … • Difficulties to contact Vorderland - Lack of interest • First ideas for pilot projects • People from Hinterland who work in Vorderland promote their region (“Hinterland ambassadors”) • Partnerships between clubs and associations in VL and HL • Events in Hinterland to attract visitors

  5. Approach PP 09(City of Tczew) • Tczew as intermediate between Vorder- and Hinterland • Connecting Hinterland via Tczew to the Gdańsk area (Gdynia, Gdańsk, Sopot) • Regional meeting with transport representatives from Vorderland • Development of joint projects in the field of infrastructure, housing and tourism Gdansk-Area Tczew Hinterland

  6. Additional contributions

  7. Analysis PP 03 (Kaunas University) • Some results of a conference in Kaunas with 344 participants: • „Vorderlands are not interested in Hinterlands as a potential for market development.“ • Lack of capacity in implementation as Hinterland inhabitants are not open enough • „Competition, not co-operation is typical for Hinterland-Vorderland-Links.“ • „The development strategies of Vorderlands and Hinterlands are not harmonised.“

  8. First Experiences(and questions for discussion) • Focus on rather smaller distances between Hinter- and Vorderland Which is the maximum range of Hinterland? • Focus on attracting tourism in HinterlandWhich is the target group in Vorderland I can reach? • Vorderland representatives are not interestedAre Hinterland potentials relevant for inhabitants of Vorderland?

  9. Recommendations for pilot profiling • Be aware of reluctance in Vorderland • Take into account target group, range and relevance • Intensify the search for partners in Vorderland • Concentrate on specific projects for pilots – do not try to solve all problems with one pilot project • Contact partners individually • Be clear of the aim and of possible pilots when contacting partners

  10. Information letter on HL-VL-Links • Short information letter as inlay to the general Hinterland-Newsletter • Deadline: Around End of April • Covering WP 3-Issues of Linking Vorderland to Hinterland • Limited to 4 contributions from project partners • Existing contribution of Tczew (for general newsletter) on linking Hinterland via Tczew to Trójmiasto • One (transport related) contribution from PP 02 • One economy related contribution from ??? • One partnership related contribution from ??? • If you wand to contribute: Please contact me!

  11. ALTER VORTRAG • Falls es noch ein paar alte Folien braucht…

  12. Mobilising partnerships to PP 1-2: Berlin, Potsdam PP 3-6: Kaunas, Vilnius, Coastal Area around Klaipeda PP 7: Gdansk, Baltic Sea coast PP 9: Olsztyn (Gdansk / Warsaw) PP 10-13: Arhus, Copenhagen, North Sea coast PP 14: St. Petersburg (?), Pskow PP 15: St. Petersburg, Moskwa

  13. Strategic focus 1. Promotion Hinterland development with “Vorderland” links and co-operations (urban/coastal/metropolitan linkages) 2. Dissemination of Hinterland decline items/potentials to Vorderlands. Mobilising partnerships with prospering neighbours including piloting.

  14. Results (according to project application) • Enhancing interest and engagement for Hinterland decline issues • Key potentials in new innovative partnerships in Hinterland-Vorderland relations • Models of Hinterland-Vorderland co-operations due to decline issues"

  15. Result indicators(according to project application) • Number of Hinterland-Vorderland connections • Number of actors to explore potentials and number of beneficiaries from explored potentials • Number of involved partners of pilot application"

  16. Outputs • Institution building/Implementation of mutual and constant information flow instruments to be installed in Vorderlands: • rural embassies • rural market spots • rural treasuries • rural marriages • Hinterland-Vorderland meetings • Hinterland-Vorderland chatrooms • Hinterland homecomers’ club

  17. Tasks and degree of performance

  18. Overviewon the work carried out so far • Generally, preparations have started in most regions • Brainstorming events on local or regional level have either been accomplished or are foreseen within the next weeks. • First contacts to possible partners in the Vorderland have been made – until now without specific outcome • Some regions have selected potentials • Some regions have developed further ideas for co-operation potentials between Hinter- and Vorderland

  19. Milestone 1 no information received from PP 03, 04, 06 no information received from PP 08 no information received from PP 15 C: completed, R: running, P: planned, D: Delayed, N: not planned, Z: cancelled

  20. Delayedtasks MS 1

  21. Potentialsfor Hinterland-Vorderland co-operations General potentials in the Hinterland regions with importance for Hinterland-Vorderland co-operations no information received from PP no information received from PP no information received from PP see below no information received from PP

  22. Potentialsfor Hinterland-Vorderland co-operations General potentials in the Hinterland regions with importance for Hinterland-Vorderland co-operations no information received from PP no information received from PP no information received from PP see below no information received from PP

  23. Potentials can be modifiedaccording to local situation Modification of the potentials from PP 10-13

  24. Comment • Similar linkages • Similar potentials for information exchange • Individual priorities (Denmark)

  25. Tasks - Milestone 2(July - December 2006) Research and preparation • Selection, structuring and evaluation of ideas and potentials for neighbouring Hinterland-Vorderland links • Assessment, selection and determination of key potentials Regional events • Hinterland-Vorderland meetings with relevant institutions / organisations (business, services, culture, social matters) • Hinterland-Vorderland campaign (TV, newspaper, conferences, internet...) • Dissemination of informations sets

  26. Tasks MS 2

  27. Outlook on Milestone 2 Key potentials • After the collection of general potentials, key potentials have to be identified and determined • A potential can become key potential, when • it is relevant for Hinterland-Vorderland co-operations • it is sustainable to the shrinkage process in the Hinterland • Result should be a list of key potentials which are relevant and which can be used for the development of Hinterland-Vorderland links

  28. Outlook on Milestone 2 Events • Conference in Vorderland (one per region) • Regional meetings of Hinterland-Vorderland representatives (two per region)

  29. Outlook Milestone 3 Activities • Discussion on common priorities in enhancing regional competitiveness and exploring common potentials • Definition of key co-operation issues (quality food, healthy lifestyle, renewable energy, cultural heritage) • Bundling information to individual H-V information sets, Presentation on 3. Forum and regional meetings • Implementation and survey of pilots in (selection of examples): • infrastructure sharing examples for mobil services • urban-rural SME networking • market portals for Hinterland products/enterpreneurs • hinterland Embassies in Vorderland centers • electronic information points in Vorderland cities / towns • rural (“treasure”) box system with number of boxes

  30. Outlook Milestone 3 Outputs • Number of partnerships and actor networks • Number of common Hinterland-Vorderland priorities • Number of key co-operation issues • Information package concerning Hinterland-Vorderland co-operation • Number of pilots and pilot reports • Newsletter, press releases • Deliveries for the 4. Hinterland Forum "Development with Decline" • 12 regional meetings (2 per region); trans-national pilot accompany meeting (comb. with WP2) in Pskov Region

  31. Comments • We are delayed! • General potentials and key potentials should be developed soon • Finding contacts in Vorderland can be more difficult than expected

  32. ExampleFurther ideas of co-operation – PP 07

  33. Comment, questions suggestions Possible discussion topics (HATTEN WIR HIER, KÖNNTE ABER VIELLEICHT GANZ NACH HINTEN??) • How can we lobby Hinterland in Vorderland? • Different approaches to Vorderland-Agglomerations and to Vorderland-Coastal areas? • Is Vorderland still dependant on Hinterland? • Which links are there between Hinter- and Vorderland (socio-economic and soft-emotional links) • Are foressen outputs realistic?

More Related