190 likes | 654 Views
Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Peptides. Electrospray Ionization(ESI) and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization(MALDI). by Matt Fisher. Outline. Brief introduction to Proteomics How ESI and MALDI work Advantages/setbacks to each method ESI and MALDI in action. Proteomics.
E N D
Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Peptides Electrospray Ionization(ESI) and Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization(MALDI) by Matt Fisher
Outline • Brief introduction to Proteomics • How ESI and MALDI work • Advantages/setbacks to each method • ESI and MALDI in action
Proteomics • “To really understand biological processes, we need to understand how proteins function in and around cells since they are the functioning units.” - Hanno Steen, director of the Proteomics Center at Children's Hospital Boston • 30,000 genes code for 100,000 functional proteins in humans • Extreme cases of a single gene coding for 1,000 proteins!
Advances in Protein and Peptide Analysis • Such an enormous task requires every conceivable technique to analyze proteins • The 2002 Nobel Prize for Chemistry was shared between John Fenn, and Koichi Tanaka for their development of ESI and MALDI, respectively
Electrospray Ionization Steps to Ionization • Mix liquid sample with polar, volatile solvent • Sample is put through a capillary with a fine tip on the end • A high voltage(~2000 V) is applied to the tip of the capillary, charging the proteins and peptides in the solvent. (Multiply-charged species common in ESI) • Mixture is pushed through to an evaporation chamber
Electrospray Ionization Evaporation Chamber • The mixture starts out in “large” droplets. The addition of nitrogen gas and heat begins to evaporate the solvent in the droplets • The droplets get smaller and the charged molecules get closer together and repel, splitting into smaller droplets(Coulombic fission) • The process continues until each droplet consists of a single molecule that is charged • Molecules then enter a mass analyzer such as a time of flight(TOF) tube to measure m/z
Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) • Liquid sample first mixed with an excess of • matrix on a MALDI plate • The liquid in the mixture evaporates in open air, • with some of the sample incorporated into fine • crystals of the matrix • The matrix is a UV-absorbing species, usually of • low molecular weight
MALDI • MALDI plate is put into a high vacuum chamber and the laser is fired in bursts at crystals on the spots on the plate • At the right wavelength the crystals are irradiated and sublime. Energy is transferred to the analytes which are now in the gas phase • These protonated ions are accelerated into a mass analyzer such as a TOF tube
Advantages/Disadvantages to ESI Advantages • High accuracy • Large mass range • Can be coupled with liquid chromatography to separate samples further • Fast • Auto run with sampler or direct injection • Soft ionization Disadvantages • Complicated spectra • salts drown signal and take time to remove from the machine • A high intensity peak can eclipse smaller intensity peaks • Fine tuning work: flow rate, solvent/sample ratios, etc to get the analytes to ionize
Advantages/Disadvantages to MALDI Advantages • Preferable for large molecules • Quick, quick, quick! • Sensitive to small amounts of sample • Easy spectra • Accurate • Not affected by salts • Soft ionization Disadvantages • Fine tuning: spotting plate, getting good crystals, adjusting intensity of laser, finding crystals on plate with sample • Low shot to shot reproducibility • Short sample life
ESI Spectra CPV Bromelin_30min Max. Entropy Deconvolution Intact protein(VP2): 64,567.2 Da Digested protein(VP3): 62,315.8 Da
ESI Spectra CPV Bromelin_150 min Max Entropy Deconvolution Intact protein(VP2): 64,567.6 Da Digested protein(VP3): 62,614.4 Da
ESI Spectra CPV Bromelin_23 hr Max. Entropy Deconvolution Intact Protein(VP2): 64,568.8 Da Digested Protein(VP3): 62,615.8 Da
2007_05_31 MALDI analysis of CPV reacted with Trypsin @ 45°C 5 min
Sources • C.Nelson, E.Minkkinen, M. Bergkvist, K.Hoelzer, M. Fisher, B. Bothner, and C.Parrish (2008). “Detecting Small Changes and Additional Peptides in the Canine Parvovirus Capsid Structure”. J. Virol. 82: 10397-10407 • http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/education/tutorials/tools/ionization_esi.html • H. Steen, M. Mann (2004). “The Abc’s (and xyz’s) of Peptide Sequencing”. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 5, 699-711 • http://www.childrenshospital.org/cfapps/research/data_admin/Site602/mainpageS602P0.html • F.Witzmann, J. Li (2002). “Proteomics: Core Technologies and Applications in Physiology”. American Journal of Physiology – Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 10.1152 • http://www.innovadyne.com/Assets%20Doc/MALDI%20spots%20Biomek%20plate.jpg