1 / 15

REPORT BACK

WP2 Shifting Baselines. REPORT BACK. David J Starkey University of Hull, UK. Start-Up Workshop Kiel, 6 October 2005. AGENDA Participants Purpose of meeting Roles & responsibilities within WP2 Communication WP2 objectives Milestones (workshops 1 and 2)

conan-dyer
Download Presentation

REPORT BACK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP2 Shifting Baselines REPORT BACK David J Starkey University of Hull, UK Start-Up Workshop Kiel, 6 October 2005

  2. AGENDA • Participants • Purpose of meeting • Roles & responsibilities within WP2 • Communication • WP2 objectives • Milestones (workshops 1 and 2) • Parameters of research projects • Deliverables (publication strategy) • Data Issues • Collaboration strategy re: other WPs • Collaboration strategy re: other projects • Any other business

  3. 1. Participants 10 participants Representatives from each partner: UNAL SDU CDF CEFAS IMARPE ABERDEEN EMI HULL

  4. 2. Purpose of Meeting i. to get to know each other ii. to discuss & decide issues re: work plans, objectives, milestones, outputs

  5. 3. WP2: Roles & Responsibilities ** role & responsibilities of WP leader ** role & responsibilities of WP members AGREED: as per page 14 of Annex 1

  6. 4. Communication (within WP2) ** Contact details confirmed ** Various means of communication discussed AGREED: email & word docs sufficient DJS & AHM to investigate ‘sharepoint’ await news from WP1 re: web forum

  7. 5. WP2 Objectives ** reviewed WP2 objectives (Annex 1, p.21) ** considered concept of ‘baselines’ ** discussed feasibility of establishing ‘baselines’ AGREED: concept of baselines adopted as theme for WP2 workshop 1

  8. 6. Milestones (workshops 1 and 2) ** workshop 1: theme, venue, date ** workshop 2: venue, date AGREED: *workshop 1 to be held in Estonia, Galapagos, or Hull on 23-25 Feb, or 2-4 March 06 * workshop 2 to be held in July 07 (in Galapagos?) * DJS to cost options & report to group

  9. 7. Parameters of Research Projects ** parameters of projects confirmed Aberdeen to focus on Scottish coastal waters since c.1965 (probably west coast)

  10. 8. Deliverables (publications) ** considered types of publications – web-based data, source descriptions, analyses ** devised list of 8 ‘publication prospects’ i.e. ‘probables’ rather than ‘possibles’

  11. 9. Data Issues ** form & extent of historical data ** software used by WP2 members AGREED: *Hull to issue ‘data questionnaire’ to WP2 members * communicate with WP1 re: data dissemination * data issues to be discussed in depth at workshop 1

  12. Core Data Fields to be determined • Spatial (Co-ordinates, locators, etc.) • Temporal (Baselines, periodic units) • Species (Species, descriptors, etc.) • Catch, Effort, CPUE • Dataset Metadata • Authors • References • Accreditations • Research Methods • Research Tools • Outside Bodies • Resources • Descriptors • … ??? All information that applies to the dataset as a whole! INCOFISHWP2 Database • Desirable Data Fields to be determined • Environment (Pollution, coastal erosion, etc.) • Catch Data (Effort, vessel data, etc.) • Local (Local names, local references, etc.) • Other (Biodiversity, predators, etc.)

  13. 10. Collaboration with other WPs ** data supply to/from other WPs (WP1 & others) ** ‘overlaps’ with other WPs ** inter-dependency/autonomy of WPs AGREED: to seek clarification about ‘inter-dependency’ to invite other WP members to WP2 workshops

  14. 11. Collaboration with other Projects ** Existing links ** Ways of ‘raising visibility’ ** data sharing/overlaps/centralisation AGREED: * to pursue existing links (HMAP, CoML, OBIS, Seas Around Us, MARBEF, CEPHSTOCK) * to issue ‘strategic invitations’ to workshops * to seek clarification from WP1 re: data

  15. 12. Any other business * ‘eco-regions’ an appropriate construct for WP2? * ‘other’ historical data available * historical data held by INCOFISH members welcomed by WP2

More Related