1 / 3

Pauline Haddow, IDI: A ”Good” PhD, Panel in DT8108 IT-emner, 9 May 2010

Pauline Haddow, IDI: A ”Good” PhD, Panel in DT8108 IT-emner, 9 May 2010. Unique ” own ” work Not needing the noble prize Single Project Proof of readiness to lead other researchers Clear objective/Research q uestion Not necessarily met Clear sub-objectives Some should be met.

consuelo-azura
Download Presentation

Pauline Haddow, IDI: A ”Good” PhD, Panel in DT8108 IT-emner, 9 May 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pauline Haddow, IDI: A ”Good” PhD, Panel in DT8108 IT-emner, 9 May 2010 • Unique ”own” work • Not needingthe noble prize • Single Project • Proofofreadiness to lead otherresearchers • Clearobjective/Researchquestion • Not necessarily met • Clearsub-objectives • Someshould be met

  2. A ”Good” PhD: Inspiration • ….. • Guest lectures • PhD Defences • Conference presentations outwith your area • Participation in other projects • Very good experience • With CARE • Even if published, not nec. Part of PhD

  3. A ”Good” PhD : Thesis • Monologue in content • Collectionofpapers in practice • Clearthread • Not nec. everypaperwritten! • Thorough ”relevant” state-of-the-art • Selectliterature – not everythingread • ”Relevant” backgroundtheory • Research Summary • Walkthereaderthroughyourthoughtprocess • Limited spaceon most articles • ConceptualIllustrationof Research process • Reflectiononeacharticle

More Related