360 likes | 604 Views
Single Incision Bariatric Surgery. Ninh T. Nguyen, MD, FACS University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA. Disclosures. Covidien Grant/speaker Gore Speaker Surgiquest Consultant Reshape Research Ethicon Speaker. Rationale for Single Incision Bariatric.
E N D
Single Incision Bariatric Surgery Ninh T. Nguyen, MD, FACS University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
Disclosures • Covidien Grant/speaker • Gore Speaker • Surgiquest Consultant • Reshape Research • Ethicon Speaker
Rationale for Single Incision Bariatric • Band – need a 3.5 cm incision to place subQ port • Sleeve – need to remove gastric specimen • Bypass – no role
Acronym • Single Port Access (SPA) • Natural Orifice Transumbilical Surgery (NOTUS) • Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) • Single Laparoscopic Incision Transabdominal (SLIT) surgery • Laparosendoscopic Single Site Surgery (LESS) • Strategic Laparoscopy for Improved Cosmesis (SLIC)
Philosophy of SLIC • Strategic use of anatomic sites that will minimize visible postoperative scars - Umbilicus- Suprapubic region • Not new philosophy (plastic, ENT, GYN) • Still laparoscopy (maintain triangulation)
Evolution of Single IncisionSleeve Gastrectomy“Happy Medium” SILS LESS SILS Hybrid SLIC
Balanced Strategy to Single Incision Bariatric Surgery • - Technical difficulty • Compromising safety • Prolong OR time Improved cosmesis
Hurdles from Laparoscopy to SILS • Lack triangulation • Use of 5 mm scope • “Fighting” of instrumentation
Evolution of SILS to SLIC • Better triangulation • Less “fighting” of instrumentation
NOTUS Appendectomy NOTUS Cecectomy.mpg
Single Incision Gastric Band Lap Band SLIT band realize.mpg
Evolution of Single Incision Gastric Banding • Single incision (4-4.5 cm) between umbilicus and xyphoid process • Transition to single incision (3.2 cm) and three 5 mm trocars within umbilicus
Trocar Position for SLIC Gastric Banding Lap band SLIT realize fast.wmv
Laparoscopic vs. SLIC Gastric Banding Characteristics *p<0.05, two-sample t tests
Evolution of Single IncisionSleeve Gastrectomy“Happy Medium” SILS LESS SILS Hybrid SLIC
Laparoscopic vs. SILS Sleeve Characteristics *p<0.05, two-sample t tests
Relative Contraindications of SLIC • BMI > 50 • Need to perform other procedures (hiatal hernia repair) • Hx of prior bariatric or gastric surgery
Conclusions • In a selected group of patient, SLIC bariatric operations are feasible • Safe – no major complications • Reproducible – low conversion rate to laparoscopy • Outcomes - comparable between SLIC vs. laparoscopic sleeve & band without prolonging the operative time • Cost – comparable with utilization of mostly conventional trocars, instrument, and scope
Single Incision Bariatric Surgery Ninh T. Nguyen, MD, FACS University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
Strategic Laparoscopy for Improved Cosmesis (SLIC) – Bariatric Surgery Ninh T. Nguyen, MD, FACS University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
We’re Making Progress Come on! It can‘t go wrong every time...
Philosophy of SLIC • Transition most or all laparoscopic trocars to strategic location that minimize operative scar- Umbilicus- Suprapubic region • One visible 5 mm incision
Spectrum of Invasiveness Open Laparoscopic Single Incision