160 likes | 216 Views
Explore the effectiveness of reduced tillage and cover crops in sequestering soil organic carbon to mitigate atmospheric CO2 increase in dry Mediterranean agroecosystems. Results show increased carbon inputs, enhanced soil physical properties, and decreased soil loss. Utilizing practices like reduced tillage, green manure, and no tillage can prevent land degradation and contribute to climate change mitigation efforts. Further research is needed for a comprehensive understanding of these strategies. Contact mbonmati@cebas.csic.es for more information.
E N D
Reduced tillage and cover crops as a strategy for mitigating atmospheric CO2 increase through soil organic carbon sequestration in dry Mediterranean agroecosystems María Almagro, Noelia Garcia-Franco, Joris de Vente, Carolina Boix-Fayos, Elvira Díaz, María Martínez-Mena Soil and Water Conservation Research Group Centre for Applied Soil Science and Biology of the Segura Spanish National Research Council
Background Runoff control & ↑ SWC Yield Productivity ↓Soil loss by erosion ↑ C inputs Biodiversity & Ecosystem services Soil physical properties Soil C cycle Prevent land degradation CC mitigation & adaptation SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES No Tillage (NT) Reduced Tillage (RT) Green Manure (RTG)
Study areas & Experimental design RT RTG CT RT CT NT RTG RT 370 mm 16 ºC 284 mm 15 ºC
Implemented SLM practices No tillage (NT) Reduced tillage (RT) chisel ploughing (2 times yr-1) 15 cm depth Conventional tillage (CT) chisel ploughing (3-5 times yr-1) 15 cm depth No tillage (NT) Reduced tillage (RT) chisel ploughing (2 times yr-1) 15 cm depth Reduced tillage+green manure (RTG) chisel ploughing (2 times yr-1) at 15 cm depth Avena sativa & Vicia sativa 1:3 at 150 kg ha-1
Green manure: wet vs. dry growing season (Nov-May) 2011 (P=230 mm) 2009 (P=345 mm) ‘Alhagüeces’ & ‘Burete’ farms Vicia sativa + Avena sativa (3:1) at 150 kg ha-1 Vicia sativa + barley (3:1) at 150 kg ha-1
Monitoring soil CO2 efflux and OC sequestration ↑ C inputs • Monthly measurements of soil CO2, T & WC • Soil sampling (0-15 cm; autumn 2012) • Carbon inputs derived from plant residues • Water-stable soil aggregates and OC
Results: Soil CO2 efflux dynamics and after tillage 58% 61% 82% 53% P <0.05 P >0.05 P >0.05 Almagro et al (2009) P <0.05
Results: Annual balance of soil CO2 emissions Tillage suppression decreased annual soil CO2 emissions but did not increased the SOC stock. Annual soil CO2 emissions were not significantly increased by tillage! 20% 20% 11% The slight increase in annual soil CO2 emissions at RT & RTG compared to CT was off-set by increments in the SOC stocks driven by plant biomass incorporation to the soil. P >0.05 182 g m-2 162 g m-2 114 g m-2 138 g m-2 183 g m-2 CT NT RT RTG
Results: Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration ↑ C inputs SLM & soil aggregates size distribution at Alhagüeces (left) and Burete (right) farms + 74% + 61- 88% soil aggregates formation!
Results: Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration ~35% ~60% ~130% +112% +36% +32% +125% +44% +24% Organic C in soil aggregate sizes at Alhagüeces (left) and Burete (right) farms Garcia-Franco et al (2015) CT NT RT RTG
Conclusions ↑ C inputs Reducing tillage frequency and incorporating plant residues promoted soil aggregation and the physico-chemical OC protection without increasing soil CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. Suppressing tillage slightly reduced soil CO2 emissions but did not increase the amount of carbon stored in the soil. Longer term results and studies at larger spatial scales are needed to fully understand the mitigation capacity of SLM practices in dry agroecosystems under climate change.
Thank you very much! mbonmati@cebas.csic.es