1 / 19

Globalisation Winners

Globalisation Winners. The HARTMANN Group: From a Dressing Manufacturer to a Global Player in Health Care. Essen, September 06 th 2002 Stefan Eder. HARTMANN: A Stable Base in Europe and Beyond.

cornett
Download Presentation

Globalisation Winners

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Globalisation Winners The HARTMANN Group: From a Dressing Manufacturer to a Global Player in Health Care. Essen, September 06th 2002 Stefan Eder

  2. HARTMANN: A Stable Base in Europe and Beyond • 1818: Establishment of a cotton spinning-mill in Heidenheim/Brenz (Southern Germany) by Ludwig v. Hartmann • 1871: Break-through innovation “bleached cotton wool dressings“ • 1898: Agencies in Paris, London, New York, Brussels, Madrid, Milan, Valencia, Prague, Rome • 1968: Independent, sales 35 million EUR, 100 % in Germany • 1972: Establishment of the first foreign subsidiary company in France • 1996: 12 subsidiary companies after taking over HARTMANN RICO (Czech Republic) and IVF (Switzerland), 5000 employees, 0,7 billion EUR sales • 2002: Subsidiary companies in 30 countries, 9.750 employees and 1,15 billion EUR sales in 2001

  3. HARTMANN: Geographical Overview I (1997) In 1972, the first European subsidiary was founded in Châtenois/France. In 1995, PAUL HARTMANN AG had subsidiaries in 13 European countries.

  4. HARTMANN: Geographical Overview II (2001) * Saudi-Arabia In 1995, the first fully consolidated subsidiary outside Europe was founded in Hong Kong. Sweden1998 Den-mark1999 Russia1997 Hungary 1997 USA2000 2001 Qingdao1998 Shanghai1998 Egypt 2000 India2000 Hong Kong 1995 Guangzhou 1999 In the year 2002, the HARTMANN Group already had subsidiaries in as many as 27 countries. Singapore1998 South Africa 2001 * Minority shareholding

  5. HARTMANN: Three Business Units UBK UBP UBM

  6. The earnings performance of the HARTMANN Group Bln.Euro Proportion of sales made abroad [%]Domestic sales ATAG 1.25 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.25 0 1970 1980 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2001 1.25 0.96 52 0.76 0.70 53 0.60 48 0.54 40 37 34 0.18 16 0.05 10

  7. HARTMANN‘s Employee Growth Mainly in the International Field 9.857 8.057 5.016 3.591 2.203 1.336 1968 1990 1996 2000 2001 1980

  8. Without Strategy Success Will Become a Matter of Chance

  9. Hartmann and IBM/CM • IBM always strategic Partner beginning with typewriters • 2000: Migration SAP R2 from Mainframe to AIX based on DB2 • 2001: Evaluation of IBM Content Manager as a Archiving System for SAP • 01.01.2002: Start archiving invoices from SAP to CM • 01.03.2002: Start archiving Notes-Attachments to CM • 01.10.2002: Start archiving delivery notes from SAP to CM • 01.01.2003: Start archiving incoming documents for a certain facility • 01.03.2003: Start Project Corporate Legal with MyCoRe CM is now only used for archiving, but beginning with 2003 it will be more used as a Document Management System!

  10. System Overview • ERP: SAP 4.5B – 4.6C • Platform: AIX 4.3.3 – 5L • Hardware: ca. 25 Aix-Systems + Regatta with 12GB RAM and 8 CPU • Database: IBM DB2 • Backup: Tivoli Storage Manager 4.2 • File/Print: Windows • Mail: Lotus Domino/Notes on Windows NT • Platform: Windows NT with Citrix Metaframe 1.8 • Hardware: ca. 100 PC-Server (50 for Citrix) ca. 1000 User with Thin Clients working with Citrix and SAPGUI

  11. System Overview

  12. Document Management • System: IBM Content Manager 7.1.10 + IBM Commonstore for SAP/NOTES • Platform: AIX 4.3.3 ML9 • Hardware: p660, 4 CPU, 4 GB RAM, 2 FC-Controller ->ESS(100GB) IBM Jukebox 3995, 4 Drives, max. 258 Worms ->1,3TB • Database: IBM DB2 7.1 FP6 • Storage: Tivoli Storage Manager 4.2

  13. Archiving with Content Manager Worm Worm System Overview Filesystem /PHAG/PBS Nur Indizes oder Kopie CCO SAPGUI CFI PBS-ARCHIV‚Offline-Datenbank‘ CMM CSD /PHAG/R3ARCHIV Nach Löschen aus DB R3-ARCHIV Band SAP_ADK_DISK_PH3 A1 ZARCHIVE1 Daten (ARCHIVE)TOA02 Disk 5GB SAP_ADK_DISK2_PH3 A2 ZARCHIVE2 Disk 20GB SAP_LIST_DISK_PH3 Drucklisten (DRAW)TOA03 Band(LTO) L1 ZACxxxx (xxxx=BK) CO FI MM SD IK_SAPP3_Tx Fakturen (VBRK) TOA01 Tx ZSDOFAZ? x1 Disk 10GB x= A: Österreich, B: Belgien, C: Tschechien, D: Deutschland, E: Hongkong F: Frankreich, H: Ungarn, I: Italien, N: Niederlande, P: Polen, Q: Slowakei, S: Spanien, T: Portugal, U: USA, V: Schweiz, X: Abbrüche Nach 30 Tagen SAP‚Online-Datenbank‘ IK_SAPP3_ED /cmsap(Disk 20GB) CSTORE Einkauf (EKKO) TOA01 ED ZMEO* Nach 30 Tagen Band Lotus DominoMail Attachments IK_NOTES_MAILDB /cmdomino (Disk 20GB) DOMINO_BAND Disk 10GB Name(Objekttyp)Verknüpfungstabelle Dokumentenart CommonStorelog. Archiv Content Manager Index Klasse Content Manager Speichersystem TSM Management Klasse Physikalische Ablage

  14. Documents stored in Content Manager

  15. Documents retrieved from Content Manager

  16. Coming Projects with Content Manager“Sanimed” - Archiving incoming Documents • Ca. 1000 Documents a day in 15 branches will be scanned and archived through Commonstore to CM • Archived Documents will be assigned in to SAP records after Scanning (late Scanning) • Several Documents can be printed in central office, to be sent to a billing company Goals: • Avoiding many copies on paper • Faster response time, because documents could be printed out everywhere and need not to be sent by post • Less time waste with sorting papers, because Documents are already assigned to the right SAP record

  17. Coming Projects with Content ManagerCorporate Legal – MyCoRe (?) • Manage documents concerning corporate legal, like contracts, statutes … • Manage Information for each facility, branch, like name, country, contact persons, shareholder value… Goals: • Showing dependencies between facilities • Making research easier and faster, i.e. in which facilities Mr.X is a contact person • Publish information to intra/internet • Using MyCoRe-features like cross reference, versioning and rights management

  18. ConclusionMyCoRe/Miless – a solution for industry? • Miless already fits for many aspects in corporate document management • Miless seems to be stable enough to hold also critical documents • Miless is principly cheap, if the data model fits your needs • MyCoRe will be a solution for nearly any aspect • MyCoRe is easy to adapt to nearly every data model • There is a good knowledge base in universities which perhaps could be also made transparent in an electronic way • Industry can participate in Universities work in MyCoRe. They get a free product and by using it, they give the community more power. • The bigger the installed base of MyCoRe is, the better the results would be and the more features could be implemented • IBM should invest in bringing MyCoRe also to industrial customers!

  19. Thank you for your attention!

More Related