1 / 30

Dynamic Service Aggregation in Heterogeneous Grids

Dynamic Service Aggregation in Heterogeneous Grids. Stavros Isaiadis and Vladimir Getov University of Westminster Heraklion, Crete, 13 th June 2007 http://www.coregrid.net s.isaiadis@wmin.ac.uk , v.s.getov@wmin.ac.uk. Outline. Overview Hybrid Grid Systems

cosima
Download Presentation

Dynamic Service Aggregation in Heterogeneous Grids

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dynamic Service Aggregation in Heterogeneous Grids Stavros Isaiadis and Vladimir Getov University of Westminster Heraklion, Crete, 13th June 2007 http://www.coregrid.net s.isaiadis@wmin.ac.uk, v.s.getov@wmin.ac.uk

  2. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  3. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  4. Overview/Objectives • Integration of mobile and small-scale devices into Grid systems as service providers (and not just consumers!) • Extend the Grid towards the less powerful but more flexible end of the spectrum • Aggregation of small, mobile, and heterogeneous services • Encapsulate the inherent dynamicity and provide high-level views and programming abstractions • Ultimate vision: A truly pervasive hybrid Grid system European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  5. Why Mobile and Small Devices? • Unique Functionality • context and location awareness • multimedia cameras • intelligent wireless sensors • Global Positioning Systems • Flexibility • Extend to new geographical areas • Move business outside • Interactive and Personalized Services • With mobile phones, administrators are always near their services • Attach status and context to services European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  6. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  7. Classes of Hybrid Systems • mobile interfaces to grid resources where mobile devices are merely interfaces to functionality available in the Grid system, and do not contribute any services. • exploitation of raw resources focus is on distributing applications for parallel execution usually requiring the partitioning of the application into small independent tasks. • exploitation of services and flexibility focus is on supporting mobile services in a SOA system, while also enabling small-scale devices to contribute services towards a fully integrated infrastructure. European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  8. Hybrid Systems Application Client, User Tools, SOA MW Developer Application/User Tools/ SOA Middleware Layer Fabric Layer Mobile and Small-Scale Devices European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  9. Challenges • Grid systems have typically evolved around HPC and e-Science • Assumed a plethora of static resources • Fast and reliable networking infrastructure • Even with suitable solutions it is unreasonable to assume that everyone will adopt the same framework • In dedicated and static environments certain guidelines and policies can be enforced but: in dynamic environments that aim at agility, opportunistic computing, flexibility and mobility, imposing such restrictions is unrealistic • Providers should choose the framework that suits their devices (but results in heterogeneity • WS for interoperability and easy integration • RMI for a bit of performance and interoperability • Proprietary performance-oriented methods? • Something else??? • Cannot consider each mobile device as a full single member! • Very unreliable • Limited contribution European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  10. Contribution • A Lightweight Server-side Container suitable for limited devices • Socket-based • High performance • No dependencies • Easy deployment • But: non-interoperable, low-level. What do we do? • Related Work: • Mobile OGSI.NET • Obsolete, restricted model, complex deployment • Microservices • Very complex deployment, not very fast (WS-based) • Racoon • Promising for small Web Services (still in progress), but not very fast • WSKPeer • Promising hybrid Service/P2P approach, work in progress –no workable version European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  11. Contribution (contd.) • An Aggregator framework to enable the efficient integration of mobile devices. An Aggregator provides: • A proxy to a group of heterogeneous and mobile fabric services • an abstraction layer that hides the dynamicity and heterogeneity of the mobile services • a high-level view of a virtually stable and reliable entity, despite the unreliable nature of the inner fabric services • Related Work: • ? European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  12. Contribution (contd.) Application Client, User Tools, SOA MW Developer Application/User Tools/ SOA Middleware Layer Aggregators Development API Fabric Layer Proxy Layer Mobile and Small-Scale Devices European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  13. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  14. Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Small CPU and memory footprint • Simpler services • not complex operations • no build in support for complex data types (currently) • No software dependencies • only J2ME running! • for easy deployment • Permanent and Stateful approach • To support context-awareness • To simplify lifecycle management • To reduce concurrent client connections and thus resource requirements • Friendly GUI for easy service registration European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  15. Mobile Device Proxy Server Socket Listener Socket Communicator TCP Socket Server Request Handler Service Request Translator Service Registry Service Container Selector Service Interfaces Server Side Components Java Bean Java Class Other Java LSC Stack European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  16. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  17. Aggregator Framework Integrated hybrid systems issues: • Encapsulate the big cardinality of the mobile domain • Provide reliability and availability • Encapsulate heterogeneity and dynamicity LSC-related issues: • Must enable a high-level view • Must provide interoperability VIRTUAL CLUSTER HTTP/SOAP TCP/LSC CLIENT PROXY European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  18. Aggregator/Virtual Clusters Architecture Application Client, User Tools, SOA MW Developer Application/User Tools/ SOA Middleware Layer Aggregator + Platform Service Interfaces Development API Aggregator + Platform Services Collective Layer VC Platform/ Proxy Layers Fabric Layer Groups of Mobile and Small-Scale Devices European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  19. Dynamic Service Aggregation European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  20. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  21. Case Study • Dynamic Content Aggregation from Multiple Heterogeneous Mobile Sources • Phase 1: providers must register their services with an Aggregator • Phase 2: registered services are automatically activated when they are within the “neighbourhood” of an Aggregator • Phase 3: clients can now use that Aggregator (WS) to gather content without knowledge of the underlying fabric level details European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  22. VC Platform/ Proxy Layers VC Platform/ Proxy Layers Phases 1 and 2: Registration and Activation Providers specify the shared services • Server-side Framework (WS, RMI, LSC, Other) • Implementation class • Interface location • Human readable description They can then enable sharing on the press of a button • Services are discovered by the relevant Aggregator and activated automatically • Services are now shared! European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  23. Phase 3: Invocation European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  24. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  25. LSC Evaluation: Performance Testing European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  26. LSC Evaluation: Resource Requirements European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  27. Outline • Overview • Hybrid Grid Systems • Lightweight Server-side Container (LSC) • Aggregator Framework • Case Study • Evaluation • Conclusion European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  28. Conclusions • The LSC framework manages to marry the high performance of low-level TCP sockets with the interoperability of the standards-based Web Services paradigm • Evaluation has shown that resource requirements are minimal, and there are no software dependencies or complex installation procedures • The Aggregator framework: • enables high-level abstract views of the mobile devices • Provides a virtually stable and reliable virtual entity despite consisting of unreliable fabric services • With the rapid evolution of mobile computing and related advances, the time is right to provide the foundations for truly pervasive systems European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  29. Related Resources Publications: http://www.isaiadis.com/publications/ International Science Grid This Week: http://www.isgtw.org/ (6th June Edition) European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

  30. Ευχαριστώ! Questions? The Virtual Clusters Project page: http://www.isaiadis.com/vc/ Please forward any suggestions, questions, comments to: s.isaiadis@wmin.ac.uk European Research Network on Foundations, Software Infrastructures and Applications for large scale distributed, GRID and Peer-to-Peer Technologies

More Related