340 likes | 483 Views
Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School. ▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options ▪ Practice Fields - Construction Phasing - Construction Options - Relocation Options. School Campus Site Plan. ▪ Educational Program. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School.
E N D
Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School ▪ Educational Program - History - Automotive Options • ▪ Practice Fields • - Construction Phasing • - Construction Options • - Relocation Options
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • FY12- 17 CIP Development (Feb 2011) • Used HS 2010 Building & SHS Site Cost Estimate • HS 2010 = 267,561 Gross SF • CTE Programs included (No Automotive) • Detailed Development of Educational Program • April – July, 2011 • Majority of program similar to HS2010 • CTE - Compared HS2010 to SHS Program • Could not replicate entire program
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • HS @ Cliff Farm 267,561 SF • Current SHS 287,836 SF • Difference 20,275 SF Rebuild Cost Estimate Taken from this Project for CIP
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • SB Approved September 27, 2011 • Information Meetings July 12, 2011 • August 9, 2011 • September 13, 2011 • Work Session September 13, 2011 • Presentation May 8, 2012 • *All Information Posted on Web Site
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Automotive Program Requirement for SHS • 9,000 SF Facility • 6 Lifts • 2 Classrooms • Lockers, Toilets and Storage • Options: • #1 - Replace Current Program Space • #2 - Add to Main HS Building • #3 - Detached Building on Campus • #4 - No Change from Approved Program
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #1 - Replace 9,000 SF of Current Program Space with Automotive Program • Pros: • Restores Automotive Program • Cons: • Adds an estimated $150K for redesign & $750K for construction • Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016) • Will reduce CTE and/or Core Programs
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #2 - Add 9,000 SF to New HS Main Building • Pros: • Restores Automotive Program • Cons: • Adds an estimated $4M for design & construction • Re-siting of building • Delays school opening 1 year (Sep 2016)
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #3 - Add 9,000 SF as a Detached Building on School Campus • Pros: • Restores Automotive Program • Proposed siting close to CTE Wing • Maintains current construction schedule • Cons: • Adds an Estimated $3.5M - $4M for design & construction • Reduces parking spots in staff parking • Change Order to Construction Contract
OPTION 1 PROS: ⦁ Able to provide a façade that matches and responds to proposed building. ⦁ Closer to proposed CTE program. CONS: ⦁ Lose 64 parking spaces (161 to 97 spaces). ⦁ Tighter turning radius for access to Lab.
PROS: ⦁ Lose only 46 parking spaces (161 to 115 spaces). ⦁ Comfortable turning radius for access to Lab. CONS: ⦁ Garage doors on façade may be visible from school. ⦁ Farther away from proposed CTE program. OPTION 2
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Option #4 - No Change from Approved SHS Educational Program (No Automotive Program @ SHS) • Maximize Lab use at Brooke Point & North Stafford, and use Germanna Space • Change Travel Allocation #’s to transport to 3 sites – BPHS, NSHS & GCC • SCPS can service 160 students for Auto Tech I and 80 students for Auto Tech II/III (Max 240), if we use both the labs at NSHS and BPHS all four blocks – this would mean utilizing a floating teacher to teach one block at each school. • GCC could service 40 students for Auto Tech I and 40 students for Auto Tech II/III – Max 80 *The current # of students enrolled in Auto Tech I, II & III at all three participating schools within the division is 275 (Levels II & III are taught in a double block).
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School Stafford High School Automotive Student Enrollment (2012-13)
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • SHS Construction Challenges • Building on Existing Campus • SHS Remains Operational • Environmental Constraints • Phased Construction
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Option #1 – (Current Plan) • Phase I – Main Building • Phase II – Building Demo, Parking Lots and Fields • Balanced Site – No off Site Soil Hauling
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Option #2 • Phase I – Main Building & Fields • Phase II – Building Demo and Parking Lot • Non Balanced Site • Soil import during Phase I • Soil export during Phase II • Estimated additional cost $3M
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Assuming Phased Construction with Practice Fields Constructed in Phase II • Maximize existing field use • Maintain current Academic Program • Limit off site busing of students • Provide equivalent practice opportunities
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Ground Truth: All Team practices can be accommodated on the existing SHS Campus or at their current locations with the exception of the following: • Fall: Football (Varsity, JV & Freshman) • Spring: Soccer (Boys Varsity & JV) • Spring: Lacrosse (Varsity & JV) • Spring: Tennis (B/G Varsity)
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Ground Truth: All proposed options require boys/girls Tennis to be relocated off campus • Option A – Install Turf Field • Option B – Stagger practice times on existing fields • Option C – Stagger practice times on existing fields w/Chichester Park • Option D – Cliff Farm • Option E – Relocation displaced practices off campus
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsA – Turf Field • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Lacrosse - Competition Football Field Spring 2013 • Convert Football Field to Turf Field (Jun 15 – Aug 1) • Includes expansion of track (8 Lanes) • Cost = $1.5M • Fall: Football Practice - Turf Field & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Boys Soccer and Lacrosse - Turf Field (stagger practice times)
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsA – Turf Field • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Installs All Weather Turf Field • Expands SHS track to 8 lanes • Cons: • Additional $1.5M for Turf Field Project • Summer construction will be tight • Staggered practice times in Spring • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsB – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Lacrosse – Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) • Spring: Boys Soccer – Competition Football Field and/or Field Hockey Field (stagger practice times)
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor • Practice & Games • Weather will have compounding effect • Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance • Staggered practice times in Spring • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsC – Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice • Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields 2013 • Spring: Lacrosse • Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) 2013 • Competition Football Field 2014 - 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer • Competition Football/Field Hockey Fields (stagger practice times) 2013 • Chichester Park 2014 - 2016
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options C - Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor • Practice & Games • Weather will have compounding effect • Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance • Staggered practice times in Spring 2013 • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball • Park Field used for Soccer
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsD – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm • B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Cliff Farm • Spring: Lacrosse – Cliff Farm • Spring: Boys Soccer – Cliff Farm
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options D – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm • Pros: • All Displaced Practices @ One Location • Cons: • Requires Construction Project Spring/Summer 2013 • 2 Fields w/Temp Parking - $300K • Irrigation - $100K • No Support Facilities • No Potable Water • Requires $40K for annual Field Maintenance • Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year • Requires scheduling late Activities Bus • Could impact future school construction
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsE – Relocated Displaced Practices Off Campus • B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Gari Melchers • Spring: Lacrosse • Gari Melchers 2013 • DSMS 2014 - 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer – GMS
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options E – Relocate Displaced Practices Off Campus • Pros: • Practices held in the Attendance Zone & at SCPS Facilities • Existing Competition Fields @ SHS are not over stressed • Cons: • Practices will be delayed 45 minutes after school for tutoring opportunities • Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year • Requires scheduling late Activities Bus