1 / 26

Reconstructing the 1-in-100-yr Flood in Northern Thailand

Reconstructing the 1-in-100-yr Flood in Northern Thailand. Ren é e Kidson University of Cambridge. Synopsis:. Hydraulic modelling and proxy dating identifies the 1-in-100 yr flood for the Mae Chaem river, Thailand

curtin
Download Presentation

Reconstructing the 1-in-100-yr Flood in Northern Thailand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reconstructing the 1-in-100-yr Flood in Northern Thailand Renée Kidson University of Cambridge

  2. Synopsis: • Hydraulic modelling and proxy dating identifies the 1-in-100 yr flood for the Mae Chaem river, Thailand • Flood Frequency Models fitted to 50 yr gauging record: estimate 1-in-100 yr Q • Compare with independent reconstruction • Power-Law model produces closest estimate

  3. Methods: • Hydraulic modelling • HEC-RAS; 8 km, 50 cross sections • Calibration of Manning’s n: • PSIs from several gauged high-flow events • PSI dating proxies: • C14 dating • Dendrochronology • Oral history • Written historical evidence • Anecdotal • Climatic

  4. Methods (cont) • Flood Frequency Models: • Fitted to 48 yr gauged record (1953-2001) • Types: • Log- Normal (LN) • Gumbel EV 1 • Log Pearson III (LP3) • Power-Law

  5. Study Site • Northern Thailand: South West (Indian) monsoon climate • Tropical cyclone incursion from South China Sea • Steep topography: orographic rainfall enhancement – prone to extreme events

  6. 1. Hydraulic Model Calibration

  7. 2001 Flood: Q (known) = 794 cms n (inferred) = 0.072

  8. PSIs: 2 palaeofloods • Types: • Elevated fluvial sand deposits • Wood debris in gorge caves

  9. Palaeoflood 1: n (assumed) = 0.072 Q (inferred) = 980 cms

  10. Palaeoflood 1 • Anecdotal evidence: Palaeoflood 1 = 1960 flood • 1960 flood = 1030 cms • Further Manning’s n calibration • n = 0.068

  11. Palaeoflood 2: n (assumed) = 0.068 Q (inferred) = 2420 cms

  12. 2. Proxy Dating of Palaeoflood 2

  13. C14 Dating • Teak log in cave • Problematic for late Holocene specimens • Heartwood & Sapwood dating • Dendrochronological count to cross-check • 161 tree rings • Heartwood: 1685-1726 • Sapwood: 1831-1880 • Palaeoflood 2 postdates 1880

  14. Other Proxies • Written historical records: • Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation purchased forest lease 1905 • Western artefacts in cave: Palaeoflood 2 postdates 1905 • Slackwater Deposit • Charcoal C14 date: 1889-1908

  15. Climatic Proxy • Contemporary Site Climate record: • Rainfall Anomaly correlation with All India Rainfall Index

  16. All India Rainfall Index 1876-2000 1961 1917

  17. 3. Flood Frequency Analysis

  18. Reconstructed discharge: 2420 m3s-1

  19. Power-Law ? • Malamud et al. 1996 The 1993 Mississippi River Flood: a One Hundred or a One Thousand year event? • Theoretical basis: fractal statistics • Well understood for other phenomena e.g. earthquakes • Empirical evidence: essentiality of palaeoflood reconstructions • Alila and Mtiraoui (2002): ‘the selection of the most plausible distribution for flood frequency analysis should be based on hydrological reasoning as opposed to the sole application of the traditional statistical goodness-of-fit tests’.

  20. Implications • Flood Risk Perception • Gumbel EV1 = official Thai distribution • Global Warming scenarios: • recommend incorporation of Power-Law estimates as an upper bound for FFA

  21. Conclusions • Palaeoflood discharge estimate • Hydraulic modelling • High confidence: calibration opportunities (several gauged flood events) • Reliably dated (several proxies) as 1-in-100 yr flood • Compared with FFA models based on gauged record • Power-Law model produced closest estimate to reconstructed event

More Related