310 likes | 335 Views
Evaluation of Training. NASC. Tara Prasad Kharel. Contents. Introduction Importance Process Models. What should we ask?. “Why Evaluate Training?” or “Can we afford not to evaluate training?”. What is evaluation?. Process of establishing a worth of something
E N D
Evaluation of Training NASC Tara Prasad Kharel
Contents • Introduction • Importance • Process • Models
What should we ask? “Why Evaluate Training?” or “Can we afford not to evaluate training?”
What is evaluation? • Process of establishing a worth of something • The worth means the value, merit or excellence • It is state of mind, rather than a set of techniques
What is training evaluation? • Measuring the effectiveness of training. • The extent to which the objectives of training have been achieved • A systematic process to analyze if training programs and initiatives are effective and efficient
Why evaluation? • To justify the need of training programme • To identify the strengths and weaknesses of training programme • To provide feedback on the effectiveness of the training activities • To improve the future training programme • To determine the competence level of the participants • To make compliance with the overall objectives of the organization
Benefits of Evaluation • Improved quality of training activities • Improved ability of the trainers to relate inputs to outputs • Better discrimination of training activities • Better co-operation between trainers and managers in the development of staff • Evidence of the contribution that training and development are making to the organization
Equip with artilleries Keep three questions in mind • What to evaluate? - Content • When to evaluate? - Time • How to evaluate? - Process/method
Five Steps of Training Evaluation • Step 1: Identify the Purposes of Evaluation • Step 2: Select Evaluation Method • Step 3: Design Evaluation Tools • Step 4: Collect Data • Step 5: Analyze and Report Results
Identify Purposes of Evaluation • Why do we want to evaluate training programs? • To learn from Experience for Future Improvement • To increase Accountability • To identify the strengths and weaknesses. • To compare the costs and benefits. • To test the clarity and validity of tests, cases and exercises. • To reinforce the key points made to the participants. • To determine whether the program was an appropriate solution for the specific need. • To establish a database that can assist in making decisions.
Select Evaluation Method (Models) • Donald Kirkpatrick’s model • Reaction • Learning • Behavior • Results • CIRO Model
Design Evaluation/Data Collection Tools • Questionnaires • Surveys • Tests • Interviews • Focus group discussions • Observations • Performance records
Analyze and Report Results • Data Input • Data Analysis • Frequency distribution • Using figures • Tables • Charts • Reporting • Who needs to know what? • Forms of communicating • Evaluation report
Evaluation report outline • Summary • Training Program Description • Training Evaluation Design and Methods • Findings and Results • Recommendations • Appendices
Summary • Purpose of training evaluation • Training evaluation audiences • Major findings and recommendations • Training Program Description • Training Program background • Training Program goals/objectives • Training Program participants • Training Program activities • Training Evaluation Design and Methods • Purpose of the training evaluation • Training evaluation designs • Data collection methods
Findings and Results • Description of how the findings are organized (e.g., by evaluation questions, themes/issues) • Results of analyses of quantitative and/or qualitative data collected • Recommendations • Recommendations for action based on these conclusions • Appendices • List of participants • List of Training materials • Questionnaires, pre/post tests • Program expenditure summary
Donald Kirkpatrick’s model • Reaction level evaluation – Immediate reaction - How was the training overall? (Effectiveness) • Learning level evaluation - What knowledge and abilities did participants learn at the training? • Performance/ behaviour level evaluation - How have participants applied the skills they learned? • Impact level evaluation - What was the effect on the organization?
Reaction Level Evaluation • What to evaluate? • Overall impression of the training programme(objectives, contents, resource persons, methodologies, training materials and aids, logistic support, food, accommodation etc.) • When to evaluate? • Generally, at the end of training programme • Mid-way of the training programme • How to evaluate? • Questionnaire, general discussion, one-to-one q/a
Learning Level Evaluation • What to evaluate? • The extent of which the learning was transferred – Knowledge, skills etc. • How to evaluate? • Pre/post test • Learning test/written test • Performance test • When to evaluate? • At the end of training programme • Mid-way of training programme
Performance Level Evaluation • What to evaluate? • Changes of job behaviour/performance because of training • When to evaluate? • After 6 months • How to evaluate? • Observation • Interview with the participant/immediate boss • Using checklist of work procedure • Interview with the stakeholders • Performance evaluation
Impact Level Evaluation • What to evaluate? • Measuring the effects of performance of trainees on efficiency of organisation • When to evaluate? • After 1 – 2 years • How to evaluate? • Interview • Observing • Control group • Opinion survey
Finally we agree to ask “Can we afford not to evaluate training?”