1 / 30

JHSAT Status November 2006 Carmel Meeting

JHSAT Status November 2006 Carmel Meeting. Mark Liptak FAA ANE-110 Jack Drake HAI. JHSAT Status Tenets of the CAST process Data Analysis Engaging with the international community Interim safety recommendations. Tenets of the CAST process. CAST JSAT Basic Tenets: Data Driven

dacey-potts
Download Presentation

JHSAT Status November 2006 Carmel Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JHSAT Status November 2006Carmel Meeting Mark Liptak FAA ANE-110Jack Drake HAI

  2. JHSAT Status Tenets of the CAST process Data Analysis Engaging with the international community Interim safety recommendations

  3. Tenets of the CAST process

  4. CAST JSAT Basic Tenets: Data Driven Stakeholder’s develop consensus solutions Actions can be measured Each imbedded in the IHST JHSAT process Process attributes adapted to helicopters: standard problem statements scoring criteria Recommendation categorization

  5. Data Analysis

  6. Data Analysis: The JHSAT team is currently processing 190 accidents The accident data has been downloaded from the NTSB (~4000 files) For each accident the JHSAT performs the following: reconstruct the sequence of events identify what went wrong and why it went wrong assign an appropriate problem statement identify appropriate corrective action(s) score findings based on validity, importance, ability and usage The team has currently completed 161 of 195 accidents

  7. JHSAT currently working process areas highlighted in yellow CharterDevelopment EstablishTeam Select Data Set ReviewNTSBDocket Data DevelopEventSequence Identify InterventionStrategies ScoreProblemValidity &Importance ScoreInterventionAbility/Usage Assign StdProblem Statements IdentifyProblems(what/why) Yes TechnicalReview&Expert Validation Conflicts? Prioritize byOverallEffectiveness ReportResults No IHST JHSIT

  8. Sample of event processing

  9. Data Analysis: To date the accidents analyzed have covered a wide spectrum of helicopter types and operations. We expect to be able to offer the IHST and JHSIT a comprehensive set of safety recommendations based on the analyses. The data has not been formally ranked by the JHSAT yet. This will be accomplished as a final step prior to review with experts in the affected recommendation areas.

  10. Not necessarily representative of final JHSAT product

  11. Not necessarily representative of final JHSAT product

  12. Not necessarily representative of final JHSAT product

  13. Engaging with the international community

  14. Engaging with the international community The preceding slide shows worldwide accident trends for the last 26 years. The criticality of working with the international community to reduce worldwide rates is readily apparent since the US accounts for only 35 to 40% of accidents on an annual basis. Any entity that possess large helicopter accident datasets that could be processed by the JHSAT method should be considered. Working with EASA and TC. Working JHSAT formation in Australia (Mar meeting), Working May/June meeting in Sao Paulo for SA. India contacts established. China? CIS?

  15. Engaging with the international community A structured approach needs to be used to manage the analytical and implementation work sponsored by the IHST. Key attributes: All recommendations will be data driven Regional ownership - Data is owned and analyzed by those most familiar with it. Safety recommendations will be implemented by teams most familiar with local needs. JHSAT and JHSIT lead teams will be responsible for training/coaching regional teams, measuring the results of the safety recommendations and implementation effectiveness.

  16. IHST Safety Initiative Analysis, Implementation and Metrics Management Structure IHSTExecutive Committee Need to maintain a strongcommunication/feedback loopbetween IHST – JHSAT - JHSIT Process development usingUS NTSB datarepresents 48% ofworldwide fleet JHSAT Lead Group Measure Accident Reductions Effectiveness Measure Implementation Effectiveness JHSIT Lead Group JHSAT sends recommendations to JHSIT JHSAT/JHSITcross-talk US JHSIT EASA EHSIT Region X, Y, Z JHSIT US JHSAT EASA EHSAT Region X, Y, Z JHSIT US/EASA/X,Y,Z Implementation Results US/EASA/X,Y,Z Consolidated Recommendations Regions X, Y, Z defined as those pockets of operation not ableto staff a full JHSAT team and are willing to work implementation of US/CAN/EASA findings to benefit their fleets

  17. JHSAT Lead GroupAnalysis of International Data Matt Rigsby is JHSAT POC Seeking data rich partners Preliminary discussions with: Canada EASA (CAA-UK, France BEA) Brazil NZ (contacted, no reply) Australia Chile Canadian Military USN Near-term: bring Canada & EASA on-line Interim Goal: have Canada/EASA present status at the 2007 IHSS Symposium in Montreal Demonstrate that this is an international effort, and it has momentum Engaging with the International Community IHSTOutreach/MarketingEmerging Fleets Somen is the IHST POCIdentify emerging/high growth markets Develop strategy to: Foster participation Benefit from IHST knowledge base Candidates: China India CIS? JHSIT Lead GroupImplementingRegional Solutions JHSIT will also have international partner management responsibilities: custom tailored regional solutions coordinated with JHSAT coordinated with IHST

  18. Potential Barriers for JHSAT function: Variation in dataset quality, definitions, etc, around the world may complicate use of standardized JHSAT approach. Military involvement may not be available.Lack of fleet hours may complicate ability to measure and/or normalize results. Regional teams may be difficult to staff with sufficient level of expertise representing manufacturers, operators and regulatory interests. Regional teams may have difficulty working to IHST/JHSAT timing and milestonesSome of these issues may also apply to the JHSIT function

  19. Coordinating JHSAT US and International Efforts US CivilDataset Selection (1/2 of helicopters Worldwide) JSAT ProcessUnderstandingRefining Expert Review/Validation JHSAT Analysis TechReview 2Q 07 May 06 - Jan 07 Mar 07 Apr 07 May/June 06 First SetUS MitigationRecs Mar/Apr 06 FCAA & Military Partners conductJHSATanalyses on their accident data Train FCAA & Military Partners in JHSATProcess MitigationRecsFCAA & Mil IdentifyFCAA &MilitaryPartners TBD 08 MitigationRecs - Global Sept 06 TBD 07/08 TBD 06/07 TBD 07/08 IHST JHSAT is on schedule to deliver US recommendations early 2Q07

  20. Interim safety recommendations

  21. Interim safety recommendations The JHSAT has developed recommendations from a series of existing helicopter safety reports. (listed on the next slide) These recommendations are being submitted to the IHST at this meeting so that the JHSIT will have several well founded general recommendations to work with. This should allow for JHSIT implementation strategizing and targeting who should be on the team. The JHSAT plan to issue its full set of analytical results by early 2Q07.

  22. JHSAT reviewed the following reports: NASA - U.S. Civil Rotorcraft Accidents, 1963 Through 1997 NASA - Analysis of US Civil Rotorcraft Accidents from 1990 to 1996 and Implications for a Safety Program NASA - ASRS Rotorcraft Incident Study - Draft Data Summary Aviation Safety Reporting System NASA - Helicopter Accident Analysis Team AMPA - A Safety Review and Risk Assessment in Air Medical Transport CRS - Report for Congress - Military Aviation Safety OGP - Safety Performance of Helicopter Operations in the Oil and Gas Industry - 2000 Data TSB Canada - Lessons Learned from TSB Investigation of Helicopter Accidents (1994 - 2003) Bell Textron - History of Helicopter Safety

  23. JHSAT Observations Based on the teams review of year 2000 accident data: Develop strategy to promote Safety Management Systems approach in helicopter community Helicopter community should align with international trends in adopting Safety Management Systems Petition the NTSB to: fully investigate helicopter accidents develop training curricula to show how accident data can be used to improve helicopter safety

  24. Review of existing Safety Reports Proximity detection equipment for helicopters Wire detection systems (EM, radar) Radio altimeters (confined to what is directly below the helicopter within direct line of sight of the sensor) Hover systems employing RADALT, doppler or other means to measure lateral drift

  25. Review of existing Safety Reports Develop and require real-time performance monitoring Adopt new technologies to provide crash info to accident investigators New, cost effective products available, adapt to specific ops Keep over burdensome government requirements out.

  26. Review of existing Safety Reports Web Site - Safety/Accident awareness – data & feedback dissemination Keep fresh safety info on an easily accessed web site Keep current accident/incident statistics Leverage NASA safecopter site

  27. Review of existing Safety Reports Aeronautical decision making training JHSIT develop a strategy to target and apply ADM training across the operational community. Include training using simulators and fixed base training devices

  28. Questions?

More Related