1 / 8

Metadata Interest Group Group Meeting at RDA Plenary 3 Dublin

Metadata Interest Group Group Meeting at RDA Plenary 3 Dublin . Keith G Jeffery Rebecca Koskela. Agenda. Tour de Table (and attendance sheet) Introduction What has been done Relationship among RDA metadata groups Relationship to other RDA groups Discussion Plan for next 18 months

dagmar
Download Presentation

Metadata Interest Group Group Meeting at RDA Plenary 3 Dublin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Metadata Interest GroupGroup Meeting at RDA Plenary 3 Dublin Keith G Jeffery Rebecca Koskela

  2. Agenda • Tour de Table (and attendance sheet) • Introduction • What has been done • Relationship among RDA metadata groups • Relationship to other RDA groups • Discussion • Plan for next 18 months • Actions

  3. Done and Planned P3 Dublin • Co-chairs Keith Jeffery, Rebecca Koskela • Our work to date has been • establish MIG • collect names • produce a case statement and have it approved by TAB • To set up web page etc • And our plan for Dublin is • to interact with as many groups as possible so we can provide the overarching forum for all things metadata.

  4. MIG / MSDWG / DICIG • Purposes of Metadata • discover the dataset(s) of interest; • evaluate them for suitability for the intended purpose; • understand them in context (i.e. the dataset related to projects, persons, organisations, facilities equipment, publications…); • allow interoperation in the sense of a homogenous query over heterogeneous datasets. MIG Directory discovery MSDWG DICIG CERIF contextual Interop-erability schema Brokering, interoperation, services RDA Groups Metadata architecture OUTCOME

  5. MIG / other groups • ‘free for all’ with at least the non-metadata group leaders in one room to refine a workprogramme for MIG taking into account all their views and requirements.  • Ideally MIG would come up with an architecture for metadata satisfying discovery, contextual and detailed requirements that could be tested by relevant groups and finally standardised via W3C.

  6. Discussion • Can we find an architecture for metadata to be used in a RDA context? • If so, what should it be? • Metadata for discovery • Metadata for evaluating relevance / quality • Metadata for understanding context • Metadata for interoperation

  7. Plan for next 18 months Intervals between plenaries • Now-September 2014 • Needs of other WGs /IGs • Architectural principles • September 2014-March 2015 • Reference architecture • Verify with other WGs/ IGs • March 2015-September 2015 • Implementation Mechanisms • Meetings at Plenaries • Website • Email lists • Virtual meetings between?

  8. Actions • Notes of meeting on website (Rebecca) • Schedule of meetings (real or virtual) on website (Rebecca)

More Related