New and Emerging Science and Technology

1. New and Emerging Science and Technology Carlos SARAIVA MARTINS European Commission RTD.B.1 Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs (NEST activity); Basic Research Athens, November 22 NEST

2. The last NEST Call for Proposals Pathfinder Topics 2005/2006 Tackling Complexity in Science Synthetic Biology Measuring the Impossible Cultural Dynamics What it means to be human Outline of presentation (1)

3. Some info on the outcome of Call 2004/2005 Practical information / Frequently Asked Questions Towards the 7th FWP Specific Programme “Ideas” Outline of presentation (2)

4. NEST PATHFINDER Call: published on 27 October 2005, closing on 15 February 2006 This is the last Call for NEST; no further call for NEST ADVENTURE, INSIGHT, or SUPPORT Call budget: €50M NEST WP 2005-06

5. Ideas must come “bottom-up” from the science base Open forum for ideas may be useful (ADVENTURE + INSIGHT proposals, NEST “ideas in-box”) A “Structured dialogue” with the research community is required to make choices: Search strategy within the science and technology “space” Interaction with the research community structured over time to move from global assessment to specific choices PATHFINDER topics Identification/Selection

6. Definition of search strategy: Areas of research where cross-disciplinary transfers of technique are creating new opportunities Outside the frame of thematic priorities Identification of candidate areas, on basis of research literature, foresight and other strategic analysis, plus open invitations for ideas Iterative process of testing and refining choices: Targeted workshops with external experts to explore candidate areas Internal consultation with thematic priorities High level consultation with EURAB, programme committee PATHFINDER topics “Structured dialogue”

7. Build and consolidate European capabilities in promising emerging (interdisciplinary) areas with high future potential for Europe in the long term. Provide “early stage funding”: as ideas mature they should be translated into more conventional funding modes Up to 10 Mio. EUR or more per topic (for several STREPS + one or more CAs) Annual calls for proposals; several topics per call PATHFINDER: Implementation

8. Initial “blue sky” topic analysis (8 March 2005) How Things Evolve: Evolution Outside of Biology Laboratory of the Future; Speeding up the Discovery Process Transmission of Culture New Techniques for Molecular Imaging Time in Biological Processes and Systems More detailed “opportunity analysis” (3 May 2005) Transmission of Culture Work programme text preparation meeting (8 July 2005) Cultural Dynamic: from transmission: and change to innovation More details, summaries of meetings, list of participants, on NEST web site. Main Workshops this year

9. Tackling Complexity in Science Synthetic Biology Measuring the Impossible Cultural Dynamics (New topic) What it means to be human (only CAs and SSAs) PATHFINDER: Topics 2005/2006

10. www.cordis.lu/nest PATHFINDER initiative on:Tackling complexity in scienceContact:Alejandro MARTIN HOBDEY2005

11. Complexity is a critical challenge towards progress in many areas of Science (e.g. biology, cognitive science) Increasing need to understand behaviour of ever more complicated man made systems (e.g. electrical grid) – Technological Systems Same is true of natural phenomena such as weather, geology, etc – Natural Systems Also true of understanding human networks (social, political, enterprise, etc) – Social Systems Common approach and techniques emerging to dealing with complex problems in science and technology Background / motivation

12. Bring together high level groups in Complex Systems Science and others in specific disciplines to tackle important problems where complexity is a key issue Extend and generalise techniques used in one area to other areas of science (“generalisability”) Help structure and co-ordinate the complexity field in Europe Objectives of initiative

13. Use of tools and techniques of complex systems science such as: Representing complex systems as networks, and networks of networks, etc “Emergence”: key characteristic of complex systems Predictability and extreme events Transfer or extension of successful techniques from one area of science to another Projects should take a practical problem solving approach, grounded in (experimental, real) data Emphasis and approach

14. Biology, Health, Medicine Bio-complexity, Cellular signalling and regulation processes, animal biology (BIOPHOT, STARFLAG, EMBIO, BRACCIA, etc) Social Sciences Emergence and robustness of social institutions, financial markets, etc (COMPLEXMARKETS, COL-PLEXITY, CAVES Environmental Sciences Predictability and distribution of extreme events in natures, such as earthquakes, floods, weather, ecology (E2C2) Particularly interested in projects that help bridge gap between physical sciences, and social and other natural sciences Some possible topics

15. Already have a “General Coordination Action” linking together the already funded PATHFINDER projects in the initiative: “GIACS” Expect that new funded projects will have some link to GIACS in some formal or informal way Expect newly proposed CAs to focus on particular scientific areas or approaches to complexity Possible Co-ordination Actions

16. Focussed Actions of more limited scope One to two years of duration Budget range: up to 250.00 € Sort of activities envisaged: science mapping, foresight, conference or large workshop, etc It would make sense if there were a link between the SSA and the already supported activities in the NEXT- Complexity initiative Possible Support Actions

17. Research of a purely theoretical nature ICT – IT related research (FET initiative) Purely industrial or engineering nature Financial research not related to social sciences (eg. Stock market analysis) Research of limited interdisciplinary nature Proposals whose primary focus lies in one of the other Pathfinder Initiatives Research in Thematic Priorities Examples of topics not included

18. www.cordis.lu/nest PATHFINDER initiative on Synthetic Biology Contact: Christian KRASSNIG 2005

19. It is the engineering of Biology: the synthesis of complex, biologically based (or inspired) systems which display functions that do not exist in nature. This engineering perspective may be applied at all levels of the hierarchy of biological structures – from individual molecules to whole cells, tissues and organisms. In essence, synthetic biology will enable the design of ‘biological systems’ in a rational and systematic way. Definition?

20. To understand how cells work you need more than a « list » of parts Systems biology provides knowledge how parts of the cell operate together New tools available such as computer models and bio-informatics, rapid synthesis, better experimental techniques to explore gene interactions Why is this topic emerging?

21. It will drive industry, research, employment, education in a way that might rival the computer industry’s development during the 1970s to the 1990s Progress will be made much faster and in a much more organized way It will enable developments of complex systems not achievable by evolutionary and screening procedures If the « engineering of biology » becomes available it will be used for more and more day-to-day applications Main vision – Biotechnology that works

22. Major change through Synthetic Biology will be achieved by integration of existing disciplines. Biology and engineering, computer modeling, information technology, control theory, chemistry and nanotechnology Synthetic Biology is primarily not concerned with investigating how nature works, but is ultimately about a new way of making things. Main directions

23. Objective/s The DESIGN and ENGINEERING of biologically based (or inspired) PARTS or SYSTEMS with: New standardised functionalities NOT present in NATURE High level of internal complexity Logical or complex dynamical behaviour

24. Demonstration of mastering control over key biological processes. Development and application of robust modules amenable to standardisation. Combination of rigorous engineering methods and high-quality science, involving adequate expertise in core engineering disciplines. Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs) (1)

25. Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs) (2) • Demonstration of real capacity to drive new discoveries and theories • and/or • Proof of concrete applicability to model areas.

26. Co-ordination of existing and future research projects. Networking of European activities in relevant fields Intellectual and material infrastructure requirements of synthetic biology Perspectives and strategies for innovation and industrial translation, including intellectual property Societal acceptance, including ethical, safety and regulatory aspects Co-ordination Action (CA)

27. Tackling practical questions related to the field. To assist in the mapping and development of the definition of the field in question. Assessing future development prospects and trends in the field. Specific Support Actions (SSAs)

28. What research will NOT be pursued ? • Research whose main focus is computational, combinatorial or biomimetic chemistry. • Research on functional genomics and proteomics. • Single-component genetic engineering and classical biotechnology, including classical metabolic engineering. • Research on structural biology and systems biology mainly aimed at the generation of basic knowledge.

29. What research will NOT be pursued ? • Protein engineering or chemistry in its classical sense. • Research on tissue engineering. • Research on artificial organs and bionics implants, and other research on classical biomedical engineering. • Research related to Artificial Life (as the term is used by the ICT community e.g. life-like machines or computers).

30. 1st Call 2003, 2nd Call 2004 30 proposals received (7 STREPs, 1SSA funded) Refinement of reference document for 3rd Call Expert Group delivered report (to develop a broader strategy for the area) Background/results (1st and 2nd Call)

31. Limited number of STREP proposals A lot of proposals not regarded as within the scope of the Call Lack of ambition in terms of the « technology vision » No particular interest in safety issues linked to the topic No Coordination Action (s) Background/results (1st and 2nd Call)

32. PATHFINDER initiative on Measuring the Impossible Contact: Carlos SARAIVA MARTINS 2005

33. Objectives Interdisciplinary research Novel investigative methods Significant advance in the scientific basis for rigorous measurements of phenomena Intrinsically multidisciplinary and mediated by human interpretation and/or perception

34. “support research on specific topics that are identified during the course of implementation of FP6 on the basis of their urgency and potential for future societal, industrial or economic relevance.” PATHFINDER: Mandate

35. Why this initiative ? …becomes a general concern for science, business and public authorities … Science- strong cross-over between physical, biological and social sciences Business- products and services appeal to consumers according to parameters of quality, beauty, comfort which are mediated by human perception Public authorities- provide citizens with support and services whose performance is measured according to parameters of life quality, security or well being

36. Measuring the impossible “Measure what is measurable, and make measurable what isn’t” Descartes (1596-1650)

37. Measuring the impossible “ If you can not measure it and/or what it means” then => how can you improve it ? ”

38. Measuring the impossible It is simply impossible to find out what a test measures, without knowing how it works Tables of correlations are unable to fill this gap, because what is lacking is not data, but theory A radical shift in orientation is needed in our thinking about measurements and validity

39. Measuring the impossible Food industry – chemical and physical analysis combined with empirical psychometric studies moved to …a more systemic understanding of the ways in which the physical world is mediated via the senses and the internal processing of signs in the human brain

40. Measuring the impossible But, is it possible to measure the role of memory in the appreciation of food? ….Or the food-addictive behaviour? Predicting food selection How to make “healthy choice the easy choice” ?

41. Fundamental scientific advances supported by interdisciplinary research and novel investigative methods for the measurement of intrinsically multidimensional phenomena, and which are mediated by human interpretation and/or perception. Specific Target Research Projects (STREPs)

42. Focus on measurement Multidimensional phenomena Mediated by human interpretation and/or perception Interdisciplinary research Novel investigative methods Concrete and tangible objectives Well posed problems and measurement challenges Long-term impact in terms of advancing science Measuring the impossible STREP Characteristics

43. to act as a forum for the development and exchange of ideas of active players to promote a wider understanding of the implications of research across the various relevant disciplines, as regards measurement to bring together experts in metrology, material scientists, biologists, psychologists, cognitive neuroscientists, sociologists, ergonomic experts to take up work in this “field” to provide a degree of coordination and interaction between the research projects ultimately selected in this initiative Measuring the impossible Co-ordination Action

44. to assist in the mapping and development of the definition of the field in question, assessing future development prospects and trends in the field. to discuss the contextual aspects of the measurement (social, institutional, economic, political, etc) to re-think assumptions about measuring systems and how uncertainties are treated. Measuring the impossible Specific Support Actions (s)

45. 1st Call Results: 2 CA 0 0 30 proposals It corresponds to 50% of PATHFINDER submissions 4 SSA 6 24 STREP (20% success rate / ~ 11M€ )

46. 1st Call Recommended PROJECTS BioEmergences – towards the measurement of the individual susceptibility to diseases or responses to treatments BrainTuning – to resolve the neural determinants of music emotions. What are the biological determinants of music appreciation? Closed – Objective measurement of functional-aesthetic sound qualities of artefacts Fuga - Measuring the human experience of media enjoyment – the fun of gaming MONAT – Measurement of Naturalness SysPAQ – Measurement of perceived air quality

47. Measuring the impossible Ethical Issues: Use of animals and GMOs (replacement, reduction, refinement) / research with children and infants Informed consent procedures Personal data protection and anonymisation Long term storage of sensitive data Social implications of research

48. Scientific areas involved (1) e.g. BioEmergences (6 academic + 1 industrial partner) biology, toxicology, computational vision, applied mathematics, cognitive science, computer science, optics/physics) BrainTuning (6 academic partners) cognitive neuroscience, computational modelling, music acoustics, neuroimaging, psychology, music perception) CLOSED(3 academic + 1 industrial partners) – acoustics, computer science, signal processing, neurosciences,

49. Scientific areas involved (2) e.g. FUGA (6 academic partners) applied psychology, computer science, human-computer interaction, communication, psychotherapy, experimental psychobiology, media technology MONAT (6 academic + 1 industrial partners) cognitive neurosciences, psychology, metrology, mathematical modelling, sensor technology, neuroimaging SysPAQ (7 academic + 3 industrial partners) aerodynamics, civil engineering, sensory perception, psychology, materials, analytical chemistry, instrumentation, indoor climate technology

50. Feedback for first call ( + ) • Successful call with many interesting projects integrating different fields of science • Projects of very high quality with the participation of highly renown institutions and scientists ( - ) • A topic as complex as “Measuring the Impossible“ needs time to develop • Some problems with the scope and the instruments