1 / 17

What are universal features of gravitating Q-balls?

What are universal features of gravitating Q-balls?. Takashi Tamaki( Nihon University ). with Nobuyuki Sakai (Yamagata University). Introduction. Q-balls:a kind of nontopological solitons consist of scalar fields. Self-gravity may not be important?. Kaup, PR172, 1331 (1968). flat ×

dana
Download Presentation

What are universal features of gravitating Q-balls?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What are universal features of gravitating Q-balls? Takashi Tamaki(Nihon University) withNobuyuki Sakai (Yamagata University) • Introduction Q-balls:a kind of nontopological solitonsconsist of scalar fields Self-gravity may not be important? Kaup, PR172, 1331 (1968) flat × with self-gravity ○　(mini-boson star)

  2. gravity-mediation type in the Affleck-Dine (AD) mechanism ○ ○ flat gravity ○ ``Q-balls” surrounded by Q-matter × TT, N. Sakai, PRD83, 084046 (2011) Here, gauge-mediation type seek for universal features!! TT, N. Sakai, PRD84, 044054 (2011)

  3. II. Model normalization

  4. III. flat case Particle motion in trivial

  5. Thick-wall solution Thin-wall solution

  6. IV. gravitating case Particle motion in Signature of depends on r.  depends on ``time”.

  7. Thick-wall Thin-wall

  8. Thick-wall Thin-wall changes ``quickly”. For various ?

  9. strong gravity WHY ??? weak gravity

  10. V. thick-wall case take up to first order in h,f. weak gravity Let us evaluate Evaluate from We used Maclaurin expansion and neglected For For We should compare with

  11. and weak gravity We assume for C=const. and approximating substitute into

  12. as in the flat case

  13. V. conclusion Gravitating Q-balls The thick-wall limit is completely different from the flat case. exists !! From the analytic estimation, our results hold for general potentials if a positive mass term is a leading order.

  14. as in the flat case

  15. important quantities Total energy (Hamiltonian) Basic equations

  16. サイズの議論 mini-BS 1/mの半径GM~1/m  BS の相互作用項の存在が本質的  e.g., Λ大 GM~1/m_re m(neutron) 程度 M=M(太陽)

More Related