1 / 8

2004 IAC Director s Meeting

Implementation Analysis From Ellie Najafi, Bradley University. Understanding Implementation RatesWhat ARs have the highest/lowest implementation rates?What are the correlations between ARs and rejection codes?Using Knowledge to Improve Report PerformanceInclude client in brainstorming sessionP

dante
Download Presentation

2004 IAC Director s Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. 2004 IAC Director’s Meeting Drew McMahan Oregon State University IAC

    2. Implementation Analysis From Ellie Najafi, Bradley University Understanding Implementation Rates What ARs have the highest/lowest implementation rates? What are the correlations between ARs and rejection codes? Using Knowledge to Improve Report Performance Include client in brainstorming session Provide additional training to IAC staff Include decision makers in final exit interview Modify rejection codes Modify format of final report Provide client recognition for high implementation rates

    3. The OSU IAC Response Active Follow-Up Facilitate report distribution, understanding Track and respond clients’ impressions of the report.

    4. Best Practices Tools http://www.oit.doe.gov/bestpractices/software_tools.shtml Current Tools Airmaster+ MotorMaster+ 3E+ PSAT, FSAT SSAT, NxEAT Future Tools CHP Tool Combined Tool Suite IAC Utilization of BP Tools Internal IAC Tool Exchange(?)

    5. CHP CHP Tools CogenPro; http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~eadc/cogenH.html DOE CHP Tool, Resources; http://www.eere.energy.gov/de/information/info_tools.shtml Other Tools RACs – Regional Application Centers RAC-IAC Synergy UIC Case, Future Goals AR Payback Penalty

    6. Database Metrics From Rutgers Direct Metrics Average Implemented Energy $ Saved Average Implemented Energy $ Saved / Usage Average Implemented Energy / Usage in Btus Average Implemented $ Saved Average Implemented Energy MMBtu’s Saved Indirect Metrics Total Number of Different ARs Recommended $ Saved per Assessment Day Total number of Energy ARs Total number of non-energy ARs

    7. Programmatic Issues (PI) Industrial Coverage Geographic Coverage Number of IAC Students Employed Average Number of IAC Students Attending Assessments Teaching Faculty Participation Timeliness Performance Adjustment Factors (PAFs)

    8. Peer Review From Director’s Roundtable Facilitate report improvement Independent of DOE metrics PDF Exchange?

More Related