160 likes | 259 Views
Using LibQual+ Data for Renewal and Change. BGSU Demographics. Regional, state-supported institution Primarily residential 15,703 undergraduates; 3,070 graduate students; 802 f-t faculty, 203 p-t faculty Carnegie Doctoral/Research-Intensive. Assessment at BGSU.
E N D
BGSU Demographics • Regional, state-supported institution • Primarily residential • 15,703 undergraduates; 3,070 graduate students; 802 f-t faculty, 203 p-t faculty • Carnegie Doctoral/Research-Intensive
Assessment at BGSU • University-wide committee was established in 1996 • University Libraries were involved from the beginning • LibQual+ was our first library-wide effort
OhioLINK • BGSU is a founding member of the OhioLINK consortium • Benefits of OhioLINK membership • Drawbacks of OhioLINK membership
Local Task Force • Representation from all areas • Staff members with experience in patron surveys and focus groups • Experience with ServQUAL instrument • Experience with SPSS
Logistics • Followed general schedule suggested by ARL • Potential pitfalls • E-mail address lists • Hardware/Software incompatibility
Summary of Results • Comments amplify quantitative data • Why use the norms tables • Areas of concern • Access • Personal control
Further Analysis • Microsoft Access • Import comments • Yes/No check boxes for content analysis • SPSS • Frequency distributions • Hi-Lo graphs
Undergraduate Survey • Population surveyed • Questions asked • Databases • Books • Remote access • Depository
Undergraduate Survey • Questions asked • Study space • Learn about new services • Student or permanent staff for assistance • What should change • What should stay the same
MOD Students • BGSU’s MOD program • Interviewing and hiring • Planning • Focus groups • Results to date
Environmental Scan Factors at the: • State level • Institutional level
Library Initiatives • Strategic Planning • Facilities and Fundraising • Communication and Marketing
LibQual+ for Bricks and Mortar • Age of library building • Feasibility report • Costs • Building committee • Fundraising
Communicating with our Users • Marketing ourselves: Are we user centered? • Our users’ view • New communication strategies • Meetings, online newsletter, letters from the dean, outreach to teaching departments
Challenges • Articulating and developing a user focus • Resources to meet user needs • Trade-offs