160 likes | 165 Views
Enter Climate Change. Climate Change Cooperation. Source: NASA. The Problem Human Induced Increase in GHG. Effect on Global Mean Temperature. The Science. Svante Arrhenius (1896) – doubling of CO2 -> increase by 5C Transnational scientific collaboration: 1970s-1980s
E N D
Enter Climate Change Climate Change Cooperation Source: NASA
The Science • Svante Arrhenius (1896) – doubling of CO2 -> increase by 5C • Transnational scientific collaboration: 1970s-1980s • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 1988 by WMO and UNEP
IPCC • Doubling of CO2 • 1.4-5C t increase
Sources of Scientific Uncertainty • Sulfate aerosol – cooling effect • Ocean – absorption capacity • Clouds – cooling or warming effect • Non-linear effect – shutdown of the circulation of the North Atlantic (thermohaline circulations)?
The Breakthrough • UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Rio 1992) • 189 countries joined • Common but differentiated responsibility • Stabilization at 1990 emission levels desirable • Reporting requirement • GEF: Main funding mechanism
The Actors • Main concerns?
COP at Kyoto • Lead actors: EU reductions of CO2, NOx, methane from 1990 levels • Transition economies: Emissions considerably (~30%) below 1990 levels ->hot air. • US Position: stabilization of all gases at 1990 levels and emissions trading to offset costs, differential targets, participation of developing countries • Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zeeland • Developing countries: industrialized countries should take the lead
The Kyoto Protocol • Emission reduction targets for industrialized countries (Annex I countries) -total emissions -5.2% of 1992 by 2008-2012 -national ceilings -Six gases included (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, HFCs, PFCs and sulfur hexafluoride). Global Warming Potentials used to translate to C02 equivalent. • No targets for developing countries • Emissions Trading, Joint Implementation, Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
COP Bonn and Marrakech • Implementation of flexible mechanisms • Forest sinks – countries can receive credits for carbon sinks (forests) • “Enforcement” mechanisms
Flexible Mechanisms • Emissions trading • Countries with binding emissions trade • Joint Implementations • Country with binding target receives emission credits for emission abatement project in another country with a binding target • Clean Development Mechanism • Countries with targets receive credits for abatement projects in developing countries – 2% tax for adaptation
Country % of 1990 Annex I E missions US 36 .1 EU 24 .2 Russia 17 .4 Japan n 8.5 Canada 3.3 Poland 3 Other EU 3.4 Acce cession Entry into Force • 55 ratifications • 55% of Annex I emissions http://unfccc.int/resource/kpthermo.html
Two Views on Kyoto Is the KP fatally flawed or is it a meaningful step in the right direction?
Kyoto Protocol Controversies • Hot air • Non-participation • Measuring additionally in JI and CDM • Enforcement • “paper” trades • Non-compliance • Exit
Current Developments • Russia ratified • EU carbon emissions trading projected started January/February 2005 • National allocation plans (cover about 5,000 out of estimated 12,000 large emitters) • Approval of national emission plans • Trade in emission allowances • COP 11, Montreal, November-December 2005