100 likes | 240 Views
Muon plans for the Phase 2 TP. Phase 2 muon plans (presented at ECFA), What’s new since Upgrade Week New upgrade management (presented today at MB) Organizing to write the muon section of the Phase 2 TP. Recap: the Phase 2 muon plans. Three main aspects: Aging studies, replacement
E N D
Muon plans for the Phase 2 TP • Phase 2 muon plans (presented at ECFA), • What’s new since Upgrade Week • New upgrade management (presented today at MB) • Organizing to write the muon section of the Phase 2 TP
Recap: the Phase 2 muon plans Three main aspects: • Aging studies, replacement • GIF++ tests for CSC and RPC chamber aging, DT components • Freon replacement for RPC gas after LS3 • DT minicrate replacement • Forward muon trigger and redundancy • GE1/1 and GE2/1 based on improved L1 trigger, redundancy in the most intense region • RE3/1 and R4/1: timing for background rejection and PU mitigation • Forward muon tagging extension (ME0) • Large eta coverage (~2.1-4.0) for big acceptance, S/N boosts in modes with muon • Hermeticity for modes excluding muons
High Rapidity Muon (HRM) layout • Proposed at ECFA workshop
What’s new in the endcap region • If endcap calor not replaced, propose GE1/1 as envisioned in LS2 • Endcap calor replacement: now in detailed engineering discussions • Space will likely be available for ME0 • Is it the “ME0” we are used to? (eta>2.1 for muon tagging, ~6 layers) • Or is it “ME0/1” and “ME0/2” where the latter covers 1.6<eta<2.4 and has more lever arm to ME1/1 than GE1/1?
Pros and cons of ME0/2 • Pros: • More trigger lever arm than GE1/1, could be more than 2 layers • Could match precisely to eta=2.4 boundary of ME1/1 • Can seek an “integrated” solution, more cost-effective? • Cons: • No opportunity to install in LS2 • Could suffer neutron “leakage” from higher eta or higher punch-through from jets than GE1/1
GE1/1: trigger motivation • The leading motivation is to improve muon triggering in this region • Rate reduction from bending angle and increased efficiency from added redundancy
ME0-ME1/1 bending for eta 2.14-2.4 close far • “Close” chambers have worse separation, still pretty good • Bending angle works well in ME0 to reduce trigger rate New simulation results (Krutelyov) Tools used: fast simulation with CSC sim hits — propagate CSC sim to GEM layer — emulate detector channel resolution — compute bending angle
New upgrade management for 2014 • Presented today at MB • There is a muon phase 2 “box” in the organization chart • Responsible to upgrade management • IMO, should also be responsible to muon IB • This is not a permanent structure, it is intended for converging on the TP plans and document (to be submitted to the RRB in Fall 2014) • Longer-term muon management structure, including the Phase 2 upgrade: • Subject of discussion, SP-elect does not want to jeopardize LS1 upgrade and subsequent commissioning • Will discuss this at the muon IB in December with the SP-elect
Upgrade organization chart for 2014 • From MB176 https://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=14&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=282923 today:
Much needs to be done • Muon responsible(s?) in the upgrade organization need to be selected, and form a sub-organization • Should coordinate with muon PMs and IB • Participate in TC meetings – endcap replacement discussions • Engineering studies – define muon endcap “envelope” • Internal costing review(s) • Decisions on which muon items to be proposed • All will be carefully reviewed by LHCC - need excellent motivation • Drafting the TP muon section (first draft due by Mar. 31)