1 / 7

Social Implications

Social Implications. e-Science Background Seeing the World as a System Drivers Scholarly communication Traces of Peer esteem Knowledge Organization. e-Science Background.

davidpalacios
Download Presentation

Social Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Implications • e-Science Background • Seeing the World as a System • Drivers • Scholarly communication • Traces of Peer esteem • Knowledge Organization

  2. e-Science Background • Background: initiatives towards research infrastructures (UK e-Science, US cyberinfrastructure, EU e-infrastructure, others) • OeSS project on ethical, legal and instutional issues • Associated changes in scholarly communication (publishing, data sharing)

  3. Seeing the World as a System • Computer science impetus ‘a generic framework applicable to any digital object…any logical entity’(www.doi.org) • The online world as a Leibnizian world of monads or an (early) Wittgensteinian world which maps onto real world relations • From philosophy to socio-technical systems

  4. Drivers • The needs of researchers (transparency and access), the needs of markets (rights), the needs of government (privacy protection and regulation of competition), standards bodies (ISO) • How do standards become established (‘the IDF is not a standards body’, www.doi.org) - Imposition, widespread adoption, effectiveness in comparison with rivals?

  5. Scholarly communication • The differential role of informal/formal communication across the sciences • Increasing the role of ‘data’ in the scientific communication system (example comb-e-chem) • The problematic nature of data re-use (Provenance, anonymity of human research subjects, intellectual property, existing incentive systems)

  6. Traces of peer esteem • The valency of the position of hyperlinks • Reputation systems • Can digital objects stabilize network traces through ‘permanent’ markers? • Will digital objects standards be able to support disciplinary differences? • Will digital objects be able to support ‘fuzzy’ objects?

  7. Knowledge Organization • The way the world will be organized as knowledge will affect future histories • Where do standards in research and standards in the world of digital objects overlap and intersect? (libraries and publications? Data repositories? Commercial products? The world of digital objects?)

More Related