240 likes | 516 Views
The Influence of the Elevated Mixed Layer on Record High Temperatures and Severe Weather Over the Northeast US in April and May 2010. Jason M. Cordeira + , Thomas J. Galarneau, Jr .*, and Lance F. Bosart + + Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences
E N D
The Influence of the Elevated Mixed Layer on Record High Temperatures and Severe Weather Over the Northeast US in April and May 2010 Jason M. Cordeira+, Thomas J. Galarneau, Jr.*, and Lance F. Bosart+ +Department of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA *Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA NROW XII Wednesday, 3 November 2010 Albany, NY cordeira@atmos.albany.edu NSF Support: ATM-0646907
Objectives • Discuss physical processes that contribute to maintenance of an elevated mixed layer (EML) to over the Northeast U.S. • Discuss EMLs over the Northeast during: • Record high temperatures on 7 April and 26 May 2010 • A severe MCS over western New England on 26−27 May 2010 (complementing Tom Wasula’s talk)
Objectives • Discuss physical processes that contribute to maintenance of an elevated mixed layer (EML) to over the Northeast U.S. • Discuss EMLs over the Northeast during: • Record high temperatures on 7 April and 26 May 2010 • A severe MCS over western New England on 26−27 May 2010
EMLs as High Lapse Rates over North America Climatology of high lapse rates (HLRs): • Data source: • North American radiosonde network • 1974 to 2007; 12Z data only • Catalogued: • Continuous 150-hPa layers • Exceeded a lapse rate of −8.0 C km−1 between 925 and 400 hPa • Warm-season: • Layer-mean θ >30°C • Intermountain-West U.S. maximum driven by sensible heating over semi-arid elevated terrain • Maximum develops poleward from Mexico to Colorado between April and July
EMLs as High Lapse Rates over North America Climatology of high lapse rates (HLRs): • Data source: • North American radiosonde network • 1974 to 2007; 12Z data only • Catalogued: • Continuous 150-hPa layers • Exceeded a lapse rate of −8.0 C km−1 between 925 and 400 hPa • Warm-season: • Layer-mean θ >30°C HLRs over the Northeast U.S.: Albany, NY Monthly HLR Frequency (N=33) • Poleward and eastward displacement of HLRs from their source region • ~50% occur in March-April-May
HLRs over the Northeast U.S. Complementary Research: • Banacos, P. C., and M. L. Ekster, 2010: The association of the elevated mixed layer with significant severe weather events in the Northeastern U.S, Wea. and Forecasting, 25, 1082–1102. • 7.6% of significant severe weather in the Northeast occurs in association with an EML. • EML plume originates over the Intermountain West and is transported to the Northeast in subsiding, anticyclonically curved flow. • Lapse rate advection dominates transport of EML. Illustrated using a scale analysis of the lapse rate tendency equation in height coordinates. Fig. 3: All sig. severe 1976-2006 Fig. 8a: 3-km trajectories for EML influenced sig. severe
HLRs over the Northeast U.S. HLRs over the Northeast U.S.: Albany, NY Monthly HLR Frequency (N=15) • Isolated March-April-May HLRs over Albany, NY (1974−2007) • Created composite air parcel trajectories from NCEP−NCAR reanalysis Composite 72-h backward air parcel trajectories: Ending at 500 hPa Ending at 600 hPa 0 h −24 h 0 h −48 h −24 h −72 h −48 h Ending at 700 hPa 0 h −72 h −24 h −48 h −72 h hPa
Maintenance and destruction of HLRs Lagrangian tendency = Tilting + Stretching + Differential Diabatic
Maintenance and destruction of HLRs Lagrangian tendency = Tilting + Stretching + Differential Diabatic Maintenance: What processes produce HLR maintenance? HLR maintained when right-hand side forcing terms are zero or balance HLR maintenance suggeststhe local tendency is dominated by advection.
Maintenance and destruction of HLRs Lagrangian tendency = Tilting + Stretching + Differential Diabatic Maintenance: What processes produce HLR maintenance? HLR maintained when right-hand side forcing terms are zero or balance HLR maintenance suggeststhe local tendency is dominated by advection. Dissipation: What processes produce HLR dissipation? HLR dissipation for thermally direct circulations, strong low-level ascent, or cessation of strong low-level sensible heating (or deep moist convection)
Maintenance and destruction of HLRs Lagrangian tendency = Tilting + Stretching + Differential Diabatic Methodology: Calculated tilting, stretching, and diabatic contributions to the lapse rate tendency following air parcel trajectories for climatology and two events from 2010. Climatology: 72-h backward air parcel trajectories calculated from 2.5° NCEP−NCAR reanalysis 2010 events: 72-h to 96-h backward air parcel trajectories calculated using 0.5° NCEP−GFS Note: Diabatic heating approximated from Lagrangian potential temperature tendency
HLRs over the Northeast U.S. Lagrangian HLR tendency following air parcels ending at 600 hPa Trajectory ending at 600 hPa A B C 0 h −24 h C Lagrangian Tendency (K 200 hPa−1 24 h−1) −48 h B −72 h A Tilting Stretching Diabatic Tendency Daily-averaged Trajectory Hours 700−500-hPa Lagrangian tendency for air parcels ending at 600 hPa: • Stretching generally balances diabatic; tilting is weak • Enhanced stretching via low-level subsidence during −24-to-0 h period • Integrated tendency approximately zero • HLRs over Northeast U.S. primarily result from advection
Objectives • Discuss physical processes that contribute to maintenance of an elevated mixed layer (EML) to over the Northeast U.S. • Discuss EMLs over the Northeast during: • Record high temperatures on 7 April and 26 May 2010 • A severe MCS over western New England on 26−27 May 2010
7 April 2010 – Early-season warmth ALB: 12Z/7 April BDL: 33.9°C (93°F) LGA: 32.8°C (91°F) POU: 32.2°C (90°F) BOS: 32.2°C DCA: 32.2°C PHL: 31.7°C (89°F) ALB: 30.5°C (87°F) CON: 30.5°C source: University of Wyoming 30°C EML SBML OKX: 00Z/8 April source: University of Wyoming EML SBML source: University of Wyoming
4−7 April 2010: Potential temperature lapse rate 1200 UTC 4 April − 1200 UTC 7 April 2010 Minimum 700−500-hPa θ Lapse Rate [K (100 hPa)−1] Time-mean 700−500-hPa Geo. Height [dam] 72-h backward trajectory Ending at 600 hPa Ending at 12Z/7 April 2010 source: 0.5-degree NCEP-GFS source: 0.5-degree NCEP-GFS 0 h −24 h −48 h H −72 h 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 K (100 hPa)−1 0.0 • Air parcel trajectories are similar to climatology • Relatively low-amplitude flow pattern likely favored strong lapse rate advection off Mexican Plateau
4−7 April 2010: Lagrangian perspective Lagrangian HLR tendency following air parcels ending at 600 hPa Trajectory ending at 600 hPa A B C 0 h • Diabatic contribution via sensible heating over Mexico • Diabatic contribution via sensible heating over Ohio Valley and Northeast (prior to “leaf out”?) • Tilting generally balances stretching and diabatic contribution over Ohio Valley and Northeast • Integrated tendency is weakly positive • maintenance via advection, modified by diabatic processes C −24 h Lagrangian Tendency (K 200 hPa−1 24 h−1) −48 h B A −72 h Tilting Stretching Diabatic Tendency Daily-averaged Trajectory Hours 700−500-hPa Lagrangian tendency for air parcels ending at 600 hPa:
26 May 2010 – Early-season warmth and severe MCS WMW: 12Z/26 May BDL: 37.2°C (99°F) CON: 35.6°C (96°F) POU: 35.0°C (95°F) ALB: 34.4°C (94°F) YUL: 34.4°C BOS: 34.4°C LGA: 34.4°C BTV: 33.3°C (92°F) PWM: 32.8°C (91°F) source: University of Wyoming 30°C EML 35°C ALB: 00Z/27 May source: University of Wyoming EML SBML
26 May 2010 – Early-season warmth and severe MCS WMW: 12Z/26 May source: University of Wyoming ALB: 00Z/27 May source: University of Wyoming EML ALB: 00Z/27 May source: University of Wyoming EML MU CAPE: ~3600 J kg−1 SB CAPE: ~2800 J kg−1 0−6 km Shear: ~15 m s−1 T850 = 21.2°C… warmest May T850 in sounding record (1954−2010) Previous T850 record: 20 May 1996 (20.2 °C)… BDL also 99°F (37.2°C) SBML
26 May 2010 – Early-season warmth and severe MCS WMW: 12Z/26 May source: University of Wyoming EML 0130/27: 0300/27: ALB: 00Z/27 May source: University of Wyoming 0430/27: 0600/27: EML SBML source: College of DuPage
22−26 May 2010: Potential temperature lapse rate 1200 UTC 22 May − 1200 UTC 27 May 2010 Minimum 750−550-hPa θ Lapse Rate [K (100 hPa)−1] Time-mean 750−550-hPa Geo. Height [dam] 96-h backward trajectory Ending at 600 hPa Ending at 12Z/26 May 2010 −24 h source: 0.5-degree NCEP-GFS source: 0.5-degree NCEP-GFS −48 h H 0 h −72 h −96 h 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 K (100 hPa)−1 0.0 • Air parcel trajectories differ from climatology • HLR advected off Mexican Plateau and circumnavigated Great Lakes region anticyclone in high-amplitude flow pattern
22−26 May 2010: Lagrangian perspective Lagrangian HLR tendency following air parcels ending at 600 hPa C D Trajectory ending at 600 hPa A B −24 h C D −48 h B Lagrangian Tendency (K 200 hPa−1 24 h−1) 0 h −72 h A −96 h Tilting Stretching Diabatic Tendency Daily-averaged Trajectory Hours 700−500-hPa Lagrangian tendency for air parcels ending at 600 hPa: • Stretching via subsidence over TX, OK • Zero tendency (weak forcing) during anticyclonic loop over MO, IL, IA • Tilting via thermally indirect ageostrophic circulation over Canada • Negative trending tendency • consistent with strong low-level ascent and initiation of deep moist convection
22−26 May 2010: Lagrangian perspective Lagrangian HLR tendency following air parcels ending at 600 hPa C D Trajectory ending at 600 hPa 2315 UTC 26 May A B −24 h C D −48 h B Lagrangian Tendency (K 200 hPa−1 24 h−1) 0 h −72 h A −96 h Tilting http://locust.mmm.ucar.edu/ Stretching Diabatic Tendency Daily-averaged Trajectory Hours 700−500-hPa Lagrangian tendency for air parcels ending at 600 hPa: • Stretching via subsidence over TX, OK • Zero tendency (weak forcing) during anticyclonic loop over MO, IL, IA • Tilting via thermally indirect ageostrophic circulation over Canada • Negative trending tendency • consistent with strong low-level ascent and initiation of deep moist convection
Broader Impact: March-April-May Statistics Daily Averaged Temperatures (b) (a) Maximum Temperature Anomaly March-May 2010 • Northeast recorded their warmest Spring (MAM) in the 116-y record • Northeast MAM maximum temperature anomalies of +2 to +4°C • Albany, NY 365-d departure from long term mean of +1.5°C source: Climate Services and Monitoring Division, NOAA/NCDC source: Climate Services and Monitoring Division, NOAA/NCDC Albany, NY 31-d mean daily temperature anomaly (°C) (c) source: Climate Prediction Center / NCEP
Summary • HLRs over the Northeast U.S. • preferentially occur March, April, and May • primarily result from advection off Mexican Plateau source region • 4−7 April 2010 HLR • resulted from advection off Mexican Plateau • likely maintained over Northeast via diabatic heating associated with strong low-level sensible heating prior to “leaf-out” • contributed to deep mixing and record high temperatures • 22−27 May 2010 HLR • resulted from circuitous advection off Mexican Plateau • maintained via stretching (subsidence) and tilting, weakened in presence of deep moist convection over Northeast • contributed to record high temperatures and a severe MCS