1 / 20

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Michigan Suburbs Alliance August 2, 2013. 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Six goals shape policy . Access to jobs, markets, services and amenities Reliable quality infrastructure Attractive environmental assets. Goals continued.

deiter
Download Presentation

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments

  2. Michigan Suburbs AllianceAugust 2, 2013

  3. 2040Regional TransportationPlan

  4. Six goals shape policy • Access to jobs, markets, services and amenities • Reliable quality infrastructure • Attractive environmental assets

  5. Goals continued • Economic prosperity • Desirable communities • Fiscally sustainable public services

  6. Projects range “from A to Z” • Transit • Operations • Pavement/bridge maintenance • Bike/pedestrian projects • Safety • Capacity

  7. Employment and Population Similar to 2000 Levels Southeast Michigan, 1990-2040 Source: SEMCOG 2040 Regional Development Forecast

  8. How We are Investing Between 2014-2017

  9. How We are Investing Through 2040

  10. Motor Fuels Tax Receipts

  11. Infrastructure Funding Formulas are Increasingly Obsolete Impact of Federal Fuel Economy Standards $204 million per year

  12. We're Under-Investing…Changing pavement condition 2004 2012 Costs have more than doubled Percent Lane Miles

  13. …and it is escalating costs to taxpayers(in millions)

  14. 70% Say More Funding is Needed to Care for What We Have More funding is needed to ensure infrastructure is properly maintained.

  15. The Paradox:73% also say the problem is inefficiency in spending, not the amount of $ we have It’s not the amount we spend, it’s how efficiently we spend it.

  16. Good News: Significant Majority Are Willing to Act

  17. State Equalized Value (SEV) and Taxable Value of Property

  18. Advocacy Thoughts • Case for roads and transit • We have a job to do in this climate • Residents and legislature • Transit separate • Short- and long-term strategy

  19. Annual Revenue Generated in Southeast MichiganDifferent Funding Mechanisms

  20. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments

More Related