1 / 18

VELO Module Metrology

VELO Module Metrology. John Carroll. Alignment in X & Y. Module Metrology. Relative alignments between R and Phi sensors measured on Smartscope (Sms) and CMM show reasonable agreement. Module Metrology. Differences of the above show that Smartscope and CMM

Download Presentation

VELO Module Metrology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VELO Module Metrology John Carroll

  2. Alignment in X & Y John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  3. Module Metrology Relative alignments between R and Phi sensors measured on Smartscope (Sms) and CMM show reasonable agreement John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  4. Module Metrology Differences of the above show that Smartscope and CMM agree to +-10 microns, apart from 3 modules (M30,M32,M37) John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  5. Module Metrology Absolute positions of centre of Si from CMM for R LHCb x is within 20 micron tolerance LHCb y still needs to be reduced John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  6. Module Metrology John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  7. Module Metrology John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  8. Module Metrology John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  9. Module Metrology Absolute R and P rotations from CMM. Show a systematic offset from zero of -0.24 mrad. with a standard deviation of 0.06 mrad. Need to bring the systematic down towards zero. John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  10. Module Metrology Silicon Alignment Average STD R to Phi alignment (X,Y) -0.001,-0.003 0.007,0.016 R absolute (X,Y) -0.002,0.016 0.008,0.010 R to Phi rotation (mrad) 0.041 0.044 R absolute (mrad) -0.238 0.059 John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  11. Module Metrology Pedestal Mounts John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  12. Module Metrology Alignment in Z John Carroll & Girish Patel John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  13. Module Metrology John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  14. Module Metrology John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  15. Mod met John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  16. Module Metrology John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  17. Module Metrology Top of Silicon Envelope Average STD Separation envelope 2.29 0.1 Twist mm 0.02 0.25 Tilt mm 0.08 0.06 Forward edge 1.16 0.27 Rearward edge -1.12 0.23 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Envelope Nominal Worst case Forward 1.15 1.767 Backward -1.15 -1.654 John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

  18. Module Metrology Proposed Constraint System John Carroll – VELO Midterm review

More Related