1 / 22

Presentation to the Human Settlements Portfolio Committee National Assembly 20 October 2011

The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation. Performance of the Department of Human Settlements towards the Achievement of Outcome 8. Presentation to the Human Settlements Portfolio Committee National Assembly 20 October 2011. Introduction.

denniskelly
Download Presentation

Presentation to the Human Settlements Portfolio Committee National Assembly 20 October 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Performance of the Department of Human Settlements towards the Achievement of Outcome 8 Presentation to the Human Settlements Portfolio Committee National Assembly 20 October 2011

  2. Introduction • The President created the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation in the Presidency to: • Facilitate the development of plans for the cross cutting priorities or outcomes of government and monitor and evaluate the implementation of these plans • Monitor the management performance of individual national and provincial government departments and municipalities, in partnership with the Offices of the Premier, which will be starting in November 2011 • Monitor frontline service delivery in partnership with the Offices of the Premier • Carry out evaluations • Promote good M&E practices in government • Implement interventions to address blockages in delivery, in partnership with delivery institutions

  3. The outcomes • Aim is to improve service delivery by: • Introducing whole-of-government planning linked to key outcomes, clearly linking inputs and activities to outputs and the outcomes • Implementing the constitutional imperative for cooperative governance by negotiating inter-departmental and inter-governmental delivery agreements for the outcomes • Increasing strategic focus of government • Making more efficient and effective use of limited resources through introducing more systematic monitoring and evaluation

  4. The 12 outcomes • BASIC EDUCATION: Quality basic education • HEALTH: A long and healthy life for all South Africans • SAFETY: All people in South Africa are and feel safe • EMPLOYMENT: Decent employment through inclusive economic growth • SKILLS: Skilled and capable workforce to support an inclusive growth path • ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE: An efficient, competitive and responsive economic infrastructure network • RURAL DEVELOPMENT: Vibrant, equitable, sustainable rural communities contributing towards food security for all • INTEGRATED HUMAN SETTLEMENTS: Sustainable human settlements and improved quality of household life • LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Responsive, accountable, effective and efficient Local Government system • ENVIRONMENT: Protect and enhance our environmental assets and natural resources • INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS: Create a better South Africa, a better Africa and a better world • PUBLIC SERVICE: An efficient, effective and development oriented public service and an empowered, fair and inclusive citizenship

  5. Delivery Agreements A Delivery Agreement is a charter between all the key stakeholders who need to work together to achieve the outcome. • Performance Agreements between President and outcome coordinating Ministers requested them to work with other key stakeholders to develop detailed Delivery Agreements for each outcome • Delivery Agreements describe key activities, sub-outputs, outputs, indicators, and targets , identify required inputs and clarify roles and responsibilities of each key body which contributes to the achievement of the outcome • Performance Agreements between President and other Ministers also requested them to work with the coordinating Ministers on relevant delivery agreements • New National Treasury guidelines for strategic plans indicate that departments’ strategic plans and APPs must reflect their commitments to delivery agreements – will be monitored by the Auditor General and should also be monitored by Parliament

  6. Department of Human Settlements role in relation to the Outcomes Outcome 8: Integrated human settlements: sustainable human settlements and improved quality of household life • Output 1: Accelerated delivery of housing opportunities • Output 2: Access to basic services • Output 3: Land assembly and effective utilisation • Output 4: Improved affordable property market

  7. Overall progress against the outcomes

  8. Progress on Outcome 8 Output 1: Accelerated delivery of housing opportunities

  9. Progress on Outcome 8 Output 2: Improved access to basic services

  10. Progress on Outcome 8: Output 3: Land assembly and effective utilisation

  11. Progress on Outcome 8: Output 4: Improved affordable property market

  12. Conclusions • The Delivery Agreements provide for sector -wide engagement processes for co-production of human settlement development. The Department should use these more to ensure that targets are met. • DPME and DHS are jointly initiating an evaluation of Outcome 8 interventions : • Informal Settlements Upgrading; • Rental/Social housing; • Mixed Income with Affordable Housing Loans So as to: • Revise plans to produce more equitable and efficient spatial outcomes • Reconceptualise policy and programme environment • Reframe fiscal flows • Rationalise/build institutional capabilities • Frame IGR performance agreements • Make recommendations for improving programme management and oversight

  13. Drawing on the NPC’s Material Conditions Diagnostic for a Sustainable Human Settlement Vision • A network of matured well established cities is positive for a redirected human settlements programmatic approach • However our cities and towns are spatially inefficient and unequal and there is inertia in spatial form • Costs of inefficiency on economy and households (>20% of household expenditure) • Migration patterns are complex making planning for human settlement development challenging • Urban informal settlements are the primary locations for where the urban and rural meet • Because they will continue play this role we need to focus on the management and upgrading of these settlements • New entrants into cities in the pursuit of work opportunities often require other housing support options i.e. rental programmes • At the lower end there is still a total reliance on the subsidy programme • The policy shift towards a sustainable human settlement approach needs to be complemented by more detailed work on costs, institutional capacities, and funding arrangements. This then has to be developed into appropriate support programmes.

  14. Thank you Go to http://www.thepresidency.gov.za/dpme.asp for PME documentsincluding narrative guide to outcomes approach, outcomes documents and delivery agreement guide 22

More Related