1 / 37

Research Update

Research Update. 10 February 2012 Updated 15 February 2012. Background. What is the reason for increased number of storm reports with the presence of an ALT? Background conditions similar, ALT acts as trigger? ALTs associated with increased CAPE?. Procedure.

derora
Download Presentation

Research Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Update 10 February 2012 Updated 15 February 2012

  2. Background • What is the reason for increased number of storm reports with the presence of an ALT? • Background conditions similar, ALT acts as trigger? • ALTs associated with increased CAPE?

  3. Procedure • Calculate MUCAPE at 6 different stations at 1800 UTC over the length of the climatology (n=1530) • Stations: CLT, RDU, LYH, RIC, IAD, PHL • Each is located in a different section of the domain (SW, SE, WC, EC, NW, NE) • MUCAPE is calculated from most unstable parcel in the lowest 180 hPa of the atmosphere • Dataset used: CFSR • Partitioned into ALT/Non–ALT based on whether or not an ALT was present at 1800 UTC

  4. CFSR NARR Whiskers: 10th and 90th percentile

  5. CFSR NARR NARR All median ALT > all median non-ALT at 99% confidence level All median ALT > all median non-ALT at 99% confidence level Whiskers: 10th and 90th percentile

  6. CFSR NARR Whiskers: 10th and 90th percentile

  7. CFSR NARR Whiskers: 10th and 90th percentile

  8. Percentage of Days with MUCAPE > 0 NARR • Higher proportion of ALT days are associated with >0 MUCAPE compared to non-ALT days

  9. Whiskers: 10th and 90th percentile

  10. Whiskers: 10th and 90th percentile

  11. Percentage of Days with MUCAPE > 100 • Higher proportion of ALT days are associated with >100 MUCAPE compared to non-ALT days

  12. Key Results / Further Questions • MUCAPE > 0 is more likely on ALT Days • Median MUCAPE is mostly higher on ALT Days, especially at RIC, IAD and PHL • Median MUCAPE and 75th/90th percentiles are highest at IAD and PHL • MUCAPE values themselves may be a little low – dataset issues? • Could this help explain the maximum in storm reports near IAD? • Why are ALTs associated with higher MUCAPE? • ALTs associated with higher low-level θe? • ALTs associated with steeper low to mid-level lapse rates?

  13. Determining CAPE/Shear Phase-Space of First Storm Reports of the Day

  14. Objective • Determine CAPE/shear phase space in which severe thunderstorms in ALT Zone occur • This information could be useful to forecasters in determining if severe weather is expected

  15. Procedure • Find location and time of first severe report on a certain day (0400–0359 UTC) • Calculate MUCAPE and Sfc–500 hPa bulk shear at location of storm report using nearest NARR analysis time 0.5 to 3.5 hours prior to storm report (n=576) • First storm report occurred between 1530 and 0029 UTC on 76.3% of all days in climatology

  16. Problems from last time • Items (a), (b) and (c) are addressed in the following slides Email 13 Jan 2012

  17. Additional Procedures • Clustering – attempt to control for inconsistencies in “reports per storm” • Overlay a 0.5° by 0.5° grid box over the domain • If a storm report occurs within a certain grid box on a certain day, that grid box is considered “active” for the day • Any subsequent storm reports occurring within the active box are discarded for the day • The number of active grid boxes for each day are tallied to measure how widespread the severe weather was on that day

  18. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Active Grid Boxes • Some evidence for higher MUCAPE/shear on highly convectively active days, but not likely to be a statistically significant difference

  19. Additional Procedures • Subsectioning – attempt to control for CAPE/shear of first storm report not being representative of environment in which most storm reports occur NORTH CENTER SOUTH

  20. North sector shows a higher proportion of days with greater areal coverage of convection

  21. South sector peaks earlier (1800 UTC) than north sector (2000 UTC) • Center sector has flat peak between 1800–2100 UTC

  22. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Sectors

  23. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – North Sector • Not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

  24. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – Center Sector • Not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

  25. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – South Sector • Not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

  26. Few first storm reports occurred in this phase-space

  27. Few first storm reports occurred in this phase-space

  28. No first storm reports occurred in this phase-space

  29. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Month – South Sector • Monthly variability exists in CAPE/shear of first storm reports

  30. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Month – Center Sector • Monthly variability exists in CAPE/shear of first storm reports

  31. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Month – North Sector • Monthly variability exists in CAPE/shear of first storm reports

  32. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – Center Sector, Jun, Jul, Aug • Even when broken up by month, still not much to distinguish days with/without large areal coverage of severe weather

  33. 1st Report CAPE/Shear by Intervals of Active Grid Boxes per Day – Center Sector, May & Sep • Some evidence of preference toward high shear/low CAPE during May and Sept., but “n” is small

  34. Key Results / Further Questions • Clustering/subsectioning approaches show: • North sector showed highest proportion of days with greater areal coverage of severe reports • North (south) sector has a peak in time of first severe report at 2000 (1800) UTC, with center sector showing a flat peak between 1800–2100 UTC • First storm reports in north (south) sector occur in environments of greater shear (CAPE), lesser CAPE (shear) than the other sectors • North sector shows an area on the CAPE/shear phase space where severe weather does not happen

  35. Key Results / Further Questions • Clustering/subsectioning approaches show: • In all sectors, median CAPE is higher in JJA, while median shear is higher in MS • Highest CAPE/lowest shear occurs in August in North/Central sectors; July/August in South sector • Boxplots show that CAPE/shear at first storm report is not a good indicator of how convectively active a particular day will be • Why? • Need dataset with better temporal resolution? • Background conditions are of less importance than the strength of forcing for ascent?

  36. Key Results / Further Questions • Given the background convective parameters of the ALT Zone, what is the role of the ALT/PFT in triggering convection in the ALT Zone? • We have seen that ALTs are associated with above-average MUCAPE, especially in the North Sector • Where does convection/severe weather occur with respect to the ALT/PFT? • What are the processes by which the ALT/PFT triggers/sustains/enhances convection?

More Related