1 / 54

Virtual and Distance Experiments: Pedagogical Alternatives, not Logistical Alternatives

Virtual and Distance Experiments: Pedagogical Alternatives, not Logistical Alternatives. Euan Lindsay Dept Mechanical Engineering Curtin University of Technology. A Bit About Me. Mechatronic Engineer PhD in Engineering Education Senior Lecturer in Mechatronic Engineering at Curtin

devi
Download Presentation

Virtual and Distance Experiments: Pedagogical Alternatives, not Logistical Alternatives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Virtual and Distance Experiments: Pedagogical Alternatives, not Logistical Alternatives Euan Lindsay Dept Mechanical Engineering Curtin University of Technology

  2. A Bit About Me • Mechatronic Engineer • PhD in Engineering Education • Senior Lecturer in Mechatronic Engineering at Curtin • Black Belt Swordsman • Really poor guitar player • Recently Married

  3. Warning! - Active Learning Ahead

  4. Three Themes in Remote Labs • Technical • Political • Pedagogical

  5. The Purpose of Laboratory Classes • Some analysis in the literature • Fiesel & Rosa 2005 • Scanlon et al 2002 • Antsaklis et al 1999 • Many good reasons • Why do *you* have laboratory classes?

  6. Why do *you* have labs?

  7. Four underlying themes • Illustrating and validating analytical concepts • Introducing students to professional practice, and to the uncertainties involved in non-ideal situations • Developing skills with instrumentation • Developing social and teamwork skills in a technical environment

  8. There are some downsides: • Expensive to run • Difficult to schedule • Safety issues • Space requirements – need a laboratory • Require physical attendance

  9. Alternative Modes for Laboratories • Remote Access • Hardware can be anywhere • Safety issues are reduced • Don’t need room around the equipment • Asynchronous access • Simulation Access • No hardware at all

  10. Which Motivates the Technical • From the logistical • Can we control this equipment remotely? • Can we teach our students online?

  11. Three Themes in Remote Labs • Technical • Political • Pedagogical

  12. The Answer is yes • Standard industrial practice these days • Nobody manually moves valves in a Siberian Oil Refinery • First reported in Academia in 1996 – Aktan et al • “Second Best to Being There”

  13. Types of Technical Approaches • Remote Desktop - Commercial Software • Thick Client - Server • Web Services - Browser-based with Plug-ins • Hybrid - UTS - control via remote desktop, output viewer via browser

  14. 4PM: 6.720J/3.43J exercise due 2PM: 6.012 exercise out (75 students) 4PM: 6.720J/3.43J exercise out (25 students) 2PM: 6.012 exercise due [Oct. 13-20, 2000] Capacity Planning • When are experiments done?

  15. Access control • The big difference between the industrial and the academic context • Who can access the equipment? • For how long? • Do you queue for access, or book a time in advance?

  16. So we have … • Systems built for peak use • Most of the capacity is never used • Systems for controlling and scheduling access • A need to validate the investment in the equipment • Colleagues excited by what we’ve achieved LET’S SHARE LABS

  17. Three Themes in Remote Labs • Technical • Political • Pedagogical

  18. Political • At the first glance, sharing remote labs is a great idea • Provides access to new equipment • Provides wider visibility for what we have done • Inter/Multi/Trans-whatever collaboration

  19. But it’s not that simple • Penalizing the Altruist • You’re willing to share your lab, but not your time! • Reputation • Can we be seen to be using their equipment? • Infrastructure for adoption • Research infrastructure and services • Adaptation services ???

  20. Who pays for it? Access costs Maintenance Costs Repair Costs Up front costs as a project are often ok, but it’s the ongoing costs that are difficult $$ And of course…

  21. But Back to our List: • Where does any of this fit with why we actually have labs?

  22. Three Themes in Remote Labs • Technical • Political • Pedagogical

  23. Pedagogical Issues • We’re designing and building a learning experience for our students • Why a laboratory? Why a remote laboratory?

  24. Proximal labs

  25. Remote Labs

  26. Virtual Labs

  27. Two Necessary Ingredients: • Separation • Physical separation in remote labs • Psychological separation in virtual labs • Technology-Mediated Interface • Usually some kind of computer GUI

  28. Equivalency? = + = +

  29. Literature from elsewhere suggests perhaps no • Distance Education literature says separation causes changes • Technology in Education literature says interfaces cause changes

  30. The Value of Laboratory Classes… …is that they’re different • Different objectives • Different methods • Different experiences Now We Have A Different Kind of Different

  31. So What Kind of Differences? • Student happiness • Student assessment outcomes • Student learning outcomes • Students’ perceptions of learning outcomes

  32. Student Happiness • Everyone reports that the students really like it “whenever I tell someone that I can control cylinders in Sydney from my couch in Perth, people are amazed”

  33. But why are they happy? • Novelty? • Hawthorne Effect? • Relaxed Scheduling Constraints? • Flexible start time or flexible end time? • Increased access? • Personal access rather than “passenger” in a group

  34. Student Assessment Outcomes • The marks stay much the same • But they are different marks

  35. Student Learning Outcomes • Students are more reflective in the remote mode • Amplification / filtering? • Better able to handle unexpected data • And the consequences of that data • Still understand physical meanings of their data • Something that gets lost in simulations

  36. Perceptions of Learning outcomes • Students have different expectations of the different access modes • Sometime explicit, sometimes implicit • Students engage differently in the different modes • Very similar experiences can lead to very different perceptions

  37. Perceptions of Objectives

  38. Perceptions of Outcomes Mostly the same No significant differences

  39. Objectives vs Outcomes

  40. One cross-theme topic: • Technical • Political • Pedagogical

  41. Transparency is Important • Students must focus upon the equipment, not on the interface • All the gains from remote labs go away if the interface is opaque • The laboratory must still be real • How real is real enough?

  42. Establishment reality vs maintenance reality • Different levels of reality are needed for different users • Novices need to establish reality • Regular users need to maintain reality • Expert users need neither

  43. Three Themes in Remote Labs • Technical • Political • Pedagogical

  44. So What Does It All Mean? • The different access modes are significantly different learning experiences, and the students construct significantly different outcomes – outcomes that will be the prior knowledge for their future learning. • The modes are not simply interchangeable

  45. Not Equivalent ≠ + ≠ +

  46. Two Consequences • If the mode is fixed, then compensate for the deficiencies • Reconcile objectives with outcomes, remote need transparency, simulation need reminders of reality • If the mode is free, choose the mode that emphasises the desired outcomes • Non-proximal promote exception handling, simulations will promote focus on theory

  47. YOU STILL NEED REAL LABS

  48. Where next? - Research Directions • The Nature of Interactions • Student-Equipment, Student-Demonstrator, Student-Student • Seeking information, seeking confirmation • What it is about the supervision that makes the supervision valuable? About the group context? • Intelligent tutoring systems

  49. Research Directions (contd) • Establishment Reality vs Maintenance Reality • Using Game Engines • eg 2nd Life • Deception Trial • Is perception bigger than reality?

More Related