200 likes | 217 Views
Material budget, energy losses and multiple scattering. Barrel tracking. Momenta resolution for low momenta tracks determined mainly by energy losses and multiple scattering Left side – momentum resolution for pion Right side - proton. Energy loss between vertex and TPC.
E N D
Barrel tracking • Momenta resolution for low momenta tracks determined mainly by energy losses and multiple scattering • Left side – momentum resolution for pion • Right side - proton
Energy loss between vertex and TPC • Left - rel. loss as a function of particle velocity • Right – function of particle momenta
Energy losses (Bethe Bloch) • b -particle velocity • r - material density • Z - atomic number of absorber • A – mass number of absorber • I – mean excitation energy • d – density effect correction factor – material dependent and b dependent
Energy losses (Reconstruction) • b - particle velocity • r - material density • K1 and K2 – Effective parameters
Energy loses correction • Left side - correction shift as function of particle velocity • Right side – correction shift as function of particle momenta (pion)
Energy loses correction • Left side - correction shift as function of particle momenta (kaon) • Right side – correction shift as function of particle momenta (proton)
Multiple scattering (Gaussian approximation) • b -particle velocity • r - material density • P - particle momenta
Energy losses correction (Current) • Material budget and radiation length hardwired in the code • Using symmetry of the detectors • Correction layer by layer during propagation • Intervals in y and z in the local coordinate frames • Fast access • Difficult to describe non symmetric parts (big problem in TRD)
Geo modeler (0) • Used to get information necessary for energy loss calculation and multiple scattering • Local information - in each point density, radiation length, Z, A defined (mean excitation energy missing) • Mean query time ~ 15 ms • Mean number of queries • ~15 – between 2 ITS layer • ~15 – between 2 TRD layers
Geo modeler (1) • Two option considered • 1. Propagate track up to material boundary defined by modeler – get local material parameters • Time consuming - too many propagations • 2. Calculate mean parameters between start and end point • <density>, <density*Z/A>, <radiation length> • Faster (only one propagation), reusable in the case of parallel hypothesis (ITS), not big changes in the tracking
Implementation • AliKalmanTrack::MeanMaterialBudget(Double_t *start, Double_t *end, Double_t *param) • First test • Track references in inner volume of the TPC – propagated to the vertex
TRD tracking • FollowProlongatioBackG implemented • Using mean material budget • 14 steps • Propagate to first plane • Loop over TRD planes • Propagate and update in the sensitive layer • Propagate to the next plane • Propagate to the outer volume of TRD
Energy loss estimate resolution • Left side - old propagation • Right side – new propagation
Relative Pt resolution • Left side - old propagation • Right side – new propagation
Relative Pt resolution • Left side - old propagation • Right side – new propagation
Pt pulls • Left side - old propagation • Right side – new propagation
Time pulls • Left side - old propagation • Right side – new propagation
Conclusion • First results in TRD tracking • Indication of improvements in the momentum and the time resolution • Test with propagation to the vertex using AliExternalParameter and GeoMedeler – better vertex position resolution • Better interface required – without user intervention
Conclusion • Default access to the TGeoManager required • Currently loaded by hand • Better energy loss parameterization- options: • 1. Mean Energy loss and multiple scattering calculation using TGeoManager • 2. Tuning 1 free parameter -