1 / 14

PSYC 330: Perception

PSYC 330: Perception . SPEECH. SOME BASICS. Methods of Manipulation PHONATION (air pushed across vocal cords) Airflow Mass and “tuning” of cords Harmonics ARTICULATION (changes in vocal tract – ah; ee ) Change shape  change in resonance characteristics

diella
Download Presentation

PSYC 330: Perception

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PSYC 330: Perception SPEECH

  2. SOME BASICS • Methods of Manipulation • PHONATION (air pushed across vocal cords) • Airflow • Mass and “tuning”of cords • Harmonics • ARTICULATION (changes in vocal tract – ah; ee) • Change shape  change in resonance characteristics • Filter function, peaks in wave called FORMANTS • lowest freq = F1, F2, and so forth

  3. ARTICULATION AND SPEECH • Vowels • TONGUE • Up or down • Front or back • LIPS • Degree of rounding • EE, AH, OO

  4. Consonants • PLACE of articulation • Bilabial (lips): b,p,m • Alveolar (teeth): d,t,n • Velar (soft palate): g,k,ng • MANNER of articulation • Stops: b,d,g,p,t,k • Fricatives: s,z,f,v,th,sh • Laterals and glides: l,r,w,y • Affricates: ch,j • Nasals: n,m,ng • VOICING • Voiced: b,m,z,l,r • Not voiced: p,s,ch

  5. Additional Complications Co-articulation • Adjust production of sounds based upon sounds preceding and following • Context effect • lack of physical invariance in the stimulus Categorical perception • sharp labeling (one OR the other) • inability (or difficulty) discriminating within categories • discrimination performance predicted by labeling McGurk effect – mismatched auditory and visual inputvisual “gah”; auditory “bah”  perception “dah”

  6. Speech Segmentation • Saffran et al (1996) • 8 m old infants trained with 2 m stream of artificial language • After brief exposure already picking out the “words” • DV listening time to presented “words” and “non-words” • Concluded that children pick out covariance of sound combinations (statistical liklihood) • pri-tee (baby, good, far, nice) • bay-bee (girl, boy, good) • tee-bay (?)

  7. Language Development • Can you say 7,777 in Swedish? • Not just pronunciation, but hearing too • Preference methodology • In utero (HR changes) • Familiarity effect (own language, own mother, own stories) • 6 m • Preference for own vowels • 12 m • Preference for own consonants • Don’t learn to listen; Learn to ignore!

  8. Special Topic: Emotion Perception in Language Laukka (2005) Categorical Perception of VocalEmotion Expression Stimulus Development: Actress says “It is now 11 o’clock” with tones reflecting anger, fear, happiness and sadness Physically “morph” the sounds from one emotion to the next  continuous variation

  9. Method • UGs presented with sequential discrimination task with two tones (ABX) is X = to A or B? • All combinations of the morphed sounds differing by 20% were compared • Also asked to judge the emotion (in addition to discriminating it)

  10. Identification Accuracy

  11. Reaction Times: 50% v Other

  12. Discrimination: Across category v. Within Category

  13. Brain Structures in Speech Comprehension • Old school: Broca’s and Wenicke’s areas lateralization effects • AI; belt and parabelt anterior temporal lobe • HOW? • Rosen et al (2011) • How (on what basis) does language (as opposed to other complex sounds) become lateralized? • IV = intelligible vs unintelligible sentences of equal auditory complexity (created by manipulating frequency and amplitude changes in auditory signal) • DV = brain scan data (PET) • Results: intelligible sentences processed in left temporal lobe; equally complex but non intelligible sentences processed bilaterally

More Related