1 / 23

Collaborating Around Wicked Problems

Collaborating Around Wicked Problems. Chris McGoff Touchstone Consulting Group Institute Touchstone.com. Key Points. Most projects in organizations are “wicked problems” The process is opportunity-driven Fragmenting forces have and will tend to pull projects apart

dillian
Download Presentation

Collaborating Around Wicked Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Collaborating AroundWicked Problems Chris McGoff Touchstone Consulting Group Institute Touchstone.com

  2. Key Points • Most projects in organizations are “wicked problems” • The process is opportunity-driven • Fragmenting forces have and will tend to pull projects apart • Needed: anti-fragmentation (coherence creating) tools © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  3. Traditional Wisdom • All projects proceed through a sequence of steps or phases, e.g. • Perception, Definition, Analysis, Generation of Alternatives, Evaluation, Decision Making (Straus, 2002) • Problem Definition, Requirements Gathering, Requirements Analysis, Functional Specification, High-level Design, etc. (traditional waterfall) © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  4. How We Humans Actually Approach Novel Problems Problem Solution Time © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  5. Early attempts at solutions • Experiments • Prototypes • Hunches • Late efforts to understand the real problem How We Humans Actually Approach Novel Problems • Problem solving is Opportunity-Driven © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  6. “Wicked” (Ill-structured) Problems • You don’t understand the problem ‘til you have a solution • Many stakeholders • Changing constraints • $$, time, players • Run out of resources Versus "Tame Problems" © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  7. How We Humans Actually Approach Novel Problems Problem Solution © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  8. “Social Complexity” • The number and diversity of stakeholders (players with a stake in the outcome) • Kinds of stakeholder diversity: • Individual differences in character and learning style • Professional differences in expertise and language use • Different organizations and departments represented (“stove pipes”) • Differences in role and authority • Each additional stakeholder adds to density and complexity of information flow © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  9. Implications of ODPS & Wicked Problems • Sequence is a (useful) fiction. • No linear process will be adequate • White water kayaking and bungee jumping are good preparation • Neither Top-down nor Bottom-up works • Solutions & actions drive learning … do some implementation at the beginning! • The implementation details are unimportant (they will change) – the conversations around them are what matters © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  10. Implications of ODPS & Wicked Problems (2) • Resist the temptation to limit stakeholders • Wicked problems can be tamed, but doing so reduces the robustness of the solution • Focus on the planning process, not The Plan • Planning activity can create shared understanding and shared commitment • Capture and manage open issues, high-confidence assumptions, decisions. © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  11. Implications of ODPS & Wicked Problems (3) • Chaos is normal. • From a Command/Control perspective collaboration looks like chaos (ODPS) • Find textured ways to create order • E.g. Diverge/converge cycles • Good process is essential • Event/session planning, logistics, food • Facilitation … Critical when diverse stakeholders need to collaborate © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  12. How to deal with a wicked problem? • Pay much more attention to relationships and communication … • Collaboration tools (synchronous & asynch) • Iterate • Stakeholder communications (“marketing”) • “Shared display” (group memory) • Honor the limits of human cognition • Compendium, a tool for capturing complex conversations in meetings © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  13. “It ain’t what people don’t know that hurts them, it’s what they do know that ain’t so.” Mark Twain © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  14. Dialog Mapping • Creates shared display for meeting discussions • Helps group capture and explore questions, ideas, pros & cons, and other informal knowledge • Focuses group attention, without imposing arbitrary or linear structure • 3 Elements: Facilitator + Display + IBIS © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  15. IBIS:The Deep Structure of Conversation • The basic elements of design conversations: • Questions • Possible answers (Ideas) • Arguments (for and against Ideas) • Criteria for a facilitation/mapping grammar: • 1) simple to do on the fly • 2) easy to learn • 3) illuminates deep structure of the conversation • 4) increases communication and rigor + clarity of argument reasoning © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  16. The Fundamentals of IBIS Question: A topic or problem to be explored and answered. What should our word processing standard be? © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  17. Word WordPerfect Excel Idea: A possible answer or solution to the question What should our word processing standard be? © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  18. + MS Office Word + WordPerfect Mode Legal standard + Retrain non-users - Accounting memos + Argument: A statement for or against an idea (aka Pro or Con, Plus or Minus) What should our word processing standard be? WordPerfect Excel © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  19. + MS Office Word + WordPerfect Mode Legal standard + Accounting memos Retrain non-users + Excel Finding hidden questions What should our word processing standard be? WordPerfect - Excel What should our spreadsheet standard be? © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  20. Lunch Location Exercise “I’m in the mood for ribs, so let’s have lunch at Bub’s Barbeque.” “Dave is a vegetarian, so I think we should go to the Tofu Palace instead.” “They have a great salad bar at Mama Mia’s.” “Yeah, and I can get a good burger there too. Let’s go.” © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  21. Paired Facilitation Exercise • Pair up – Pick who is Facilitator, who is Client • Client: Pick a serious problem you’ve been thinking about. Starting describing it. • Facilitator: Start writing down, in IBIS, the key elements: • Questions, Ideas, Pros and Cons • Keep showing your map to the Client, get their OK that you’re getting it right. © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  22. A few tips … • Seed the map before the meeting (questions) • Write big and clear enough for everyone to see (or set QM Preferences | Font) • Keep moving your attention between the group and the display • Validate each comment with the speaker • Listen for the questions (often unspoken) © 2005 CogNexus Institute

  23. Further information … http://cognexus.org Download Compendium Reading: “Wicked Problems and Social Complexity” “The Age of Design” “Designing Organizational Memory” © 2005 CogNexus Institute

More Related