740 likes | 926 Views
Building Design for Tornadoes. William L. Coulbourne, P.E. Applied Technology Council bcoulbourne@atcouncil.org. Agenda. EF damage scale 2011 history of tornado damage Design formulas for wind pressure Illustrations of design pressures Wind-borne missiles. Why Design for Tornadoes?.
E N D
Building Design for Tornadoes William L. Coulbourne, P.E. Applied Technology Council bcoulbourne@atcouncil.org
Agenda • EF damage scale • 2011 history of tornado damage • Design formulas for wind pressure • Illustrations of design pressures • Wind-borne missiles
Why Design for Tornadoes? • Low probability but high consequence event • Property damage can be extreme • Loss of life is real threat • As professionals we should not assume there is nothing we can do • We can use existing technology
Design Strategies for Tornadoes • Use ASCE 7 wind load provisions • Modify some of the factors • Use higher wind speeds than ASCE 7 • Understand the limitations of what we don’t know
Tornado Damage Scale • EF scale is based on observed damage • Scale goes from Category EF0 – EF5 with corresponding wind speeds from 65 mph to 200 mph • Primary reference is from Texas Tech Univ. titled: A Recommendation for an ENHANCED FUJITA SCALE (EF-Scale) 2006
Tornado Damage Scale • 28 Damage Indicators used – structure or use types (e.g.): • One or two family residences • Apartments, condos or townhouses • Large shopping mall • Junior or Senior high school • Warehouse building • Free standing towers
Tornado Damage Scale • Each Damage Indicator has a range of wind speeds associated with degrees of damage for that structure type – for one and two family residences:
Recent Events We’ve Learned From • OK/KS 1999 • Greensburg, KS 2007 • Enterprise, AL 2007 • Tuscaloosa, AL 2011 • Joplin, MO 2011
Joplin, MO Tornado – 5/22/11 Joplin, MO info Located in SW corner of Missouri Population of ~50,000 Established in 1873 Area of 31.5 sq. miles Previously had tornado impact town in 1971, killing one Evaluations for 5/22 tornado by NWS classify it as an EF-5 Fatality count ~ 160 Over 8000 buildings damaged (path crossed through major commercial and residential areas)
East Middle School (2009) Gymnasium
85+% Area % of EF Damage
What We Know How To Do • Maintain load path continuity • Maintain roof-to-wall connections • Maintain wall-to-floor and foundation connections • Keep walls standing
Suggested Tornado Design Premise • Strengthen building like we do for hurricanes • Do not try and protect for wind-borne debris • Do design so interior walls stay in place • Keep exterior corners together • Maybe consider a way to ‘vent’ the upper portion of the building
Ground Continuous Load Path Concept
Research - Increase in Uplift Pressures • Reference: Tornado-Induced Wind Loads on a Low-Rise Building, Dr. Partha Sarkar, Dr. Fred Haan, Journal of Structural Engineering 2010 • Tornado simulator used to determine pressure coefficient differences with ASCE 7-05 standard • Results were: • Cx = 1.0 (no increase in lateral direction) • Cy = 1.5 (50% increase in wind parallel direction) • Cz = 1.5-3.2 (more than 3 times increase in vertical or uplift direction)
ASCE 7-16 Commentary Proposed Changes • Modify standard wind pressure equation for differences in tornado wind structure • Discuss differences so practitioners have a basis for design • Use wind speed maps from ICC and FEMA • Provide rationale and references