1 / 53

K-20 on Special Session and Governor’s FY11 Supplemental and 2011-13 Budget Proposal

K-20 on Special Session and Governor’s FY11 Supplemental and 2011-13 Budget Proposal. January 6, 2011. Questions during the K-20?? . ESD sites are interactive and able to ask questions. All other sites: email questions to Jolynn.berge@k12.wa.us. Agenda. Capital Update

dobry
Download Presentation

K-20 on Special Session and Governor’s FY11 Supplemental and 2011-13 Budget Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. K-20 on Special Session and Governor’s FY11 Supplemental and 2011-13 Budget Proposal January 6, 2011

  2. Questions during the K-20?? • ESD sites are interactive and able to ask questions. • All other sites: email questions to Jolynn.berge@k12.wa.us

  3. Agenda • Capital Update • Transportation Update • Early Action and Governor’s Proposals • Side-by-side comparisons • NBCT • K-4 • Highly Capable • LEA • Ed Jobs/Apportionment backfill • Apportionment delay • New funding formula • John Jenft F-203 • Questions

  4. Capital Update

  5. 2011-13 K-12 Capital BudgetGovernor’s Proposal School Construction Assistance Program • Maintenance Level of $486.6 Million • Funding Assumptions • SCAP appropriations are not fully funded. Governor estimated 1.3 million square feet less than OSPI’s original budget request. (Project requests are on track with OSPI’s original budget request). • Construction Cost Allocation inflationary increases to: FY 2012 = $183.78 FY 2013 = $188.55

  6. 2011-13 K-12 Capital BudgetGovernor’s Proposal School Construction Assistance Program • Relies on school district capital expenditures stretching beyond the 2011-13 biennium. • $274 M Bonds; available within the 2011-13 biennium. • $212 M Cash; majority earned after the 2011-13 biennium. • Implementation of the priority system would be likely under the Governor’s proposal.

  7. 2011-13 K-12 Capital BudgetGovernor’s Proposal Other Funding proposals: • Small Repair Grant Program – $10.0 M. • Skills Centers Minor Works for Existing Facilities – $3.0 M. • Aviation High School - $2 M.

  8. 2011-13 K-12 Capital BudgetSuperintendent’s Priorities • Fully fund the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) appropriations; Maintenance and Enhancement Levels. • Provide for basic student health and safety. • Small Repair and Energy Grant Programs. • New School Facility Safety Net. • New School Seismic Needs Assessment. • Expand career and technical education through skill centers. • Minor Works and, • Major project,s especially Phase 2 projects, at Pierce County and Yakima Valley.

  9. 2011-13 K-12 Capital Budget

  10. 2011-13 K-12 Capital Budget • OSPI requested SCAP obligations be fully funded. • OSPI’s request was heavily reliant on state general obligation bonds, which depend on state debt capacity. • Do not expect General Fund-State Transfers to the Common School Construction Account (CSCA). • Lottery redirected to Higher Education in 2010. • No agency savings projected for the 2009-11 biennium.

  11. 2011-13 K-12 Capital BudgetState Debt or Bonding Capacity • Current capacity ranges: • From low in November 2010 Bond Model = $161 million. • To high in Governor’s Bond Bill = $900 million. • $3.2 billion in bonds requested by all agencies.

  12. 2011-13 K-12 Capital Budget State Bond Capacity

  13. Transportation Update

  14. Student Transportation: Overview • Governor’s Budget Proposal. • What the numbers mean to you. • How the money will be distributed. • System Changes.

  15. Student Transportation:Budget Proposal • Funding System. • The Good News • Commitment to implement in 2011-12. • The Other News • Source of additional funding is a result of a major restructuring of the bus replacement system.

  16. Student Transportation: How Much? • Figures are in the pivot table. • Depreciation estimate for next year • Current system. • Governor’s proposal. • Lots of assumptions • Underfunding for current year. • Bus prices.

  17. Student Transportation:2011-12 Operations Allocation • Pay at 2010-11 amount until February. • Adjustment for new calculation process. • Adjustment for amount of funding available. • No recalculation after the Spring report.

  18. New Transportation Funding Model: Transition Process • Hold harmless • No one gets less than 2010-11. • Additional Funding • Estimate based on the amount of funding available from the change in depreciation. • Best guess is districts would receive about 1/3 of their underfunding in 2009-10.

  19. New Transportation Funding Model: OSPI Rules Status • Initial rules hearing was December 8th. • OSPI in process of reviewing language • Reword several sections in response to comments and concerns. • Will schedule another hearing on revisions.

  20. Student Transportation:System Changes • Bus Replacement System • May result in unintended consequences. • Maintenance Costs. • Fleet Modernization. • Regional Coordinator Program Eliminated • Would eliminate training and support for the new funding system. • School bus driver training, Management training, WSP inspection process, etc.

  21. Early Action and Governor’s Proposals - Update

  22. 2011 FY Supplemental Budget – Enacted & Governor’s Proposed

  23. 2011 FY Supplemental Budget: Eliminated Programs

  24. 2011 FY Supplemental Budget: Eliminated Programs

  25. 2011 FY Supplemental Budget: Reduced Programs

  26. 2011 FY Supplemental Budget: Reduced and Added Funding

  27. Governor’s Supplemental Cut of National Board Bonuses • Governor’s across the board cut of 6% is still in effect. • Districts should continue to claim their bonuses. • OSPI will allocate funding on a first come first serve basis . • When Governor repeals the 6% cut, OSPI will pay out the rest of the bonuses to districts who have submitted claims up to the total appropriation authority.

  28. K-4 Class Size & Highly Capable Retroactive Elimination • Governor Proposals cuts programs starting in September. • If adopted by Legislature, OSPI will adjust district apportionment payments to reflect cuts. • OSPI will transfer Highly Capable program to General Apportionment in order to then make adjustments to district apportionment.

  29. Governor’s Proposed 2011-13 Budget

  30. 2011-13 Proposed Governor’s Budget: Eliminated Programs

  31. 2011-13 Proposed Governor’s Budget: Eliminated Programs

  32. 2011-13 Proposed Governor’s Budget: Eliminated Programs

  33. 2011-13 Proposed Governor’s Budget: Suspended Funding

  34. 2011-13 Proposed Governor’s Budget: Reduced Programs * Working on Calculation

  35. 2011-13 Proposed Governor’s Budget: Adds

  36. Levy Equalization 2010-2011 School Year • The Governor’s supplemental request continues to current levy equalization model but makes a reduction of 6.3% or $18 million. • The impacts to local districts are shown on the SAFS 2011 Supplemental Budget website under the “across the board 6.287%” link. Across the Board Cuts by School District

  37. Levy Equalization 2011-2013 • The Governor’s 2011-13 biennial request equates to a reduction of 6.3%. • New “Four Tier” Model with property poor districts receiving the smallest reduction in LEA. • Over 300% above state average = 1% cut. • 175% to 300% = 3% cut. • 125% to 175% = 5% cut. • 100% to 125% = 28.75% cut.

  38. Levy Equalization 2011-13 • No specific changes in levy base calculations were proposed. • Reductions in K-3 this year will not reduce the levy base. • Levy Equalization continues to be calculated based on 14%. • The Per Pupil Inflator in the Governor’s budget is 3%.

  39. Ed Jobs • Ed Jobs Funding • $208K Total. Allocation by district is on our website. • The Legislative Special Session directed that these funds will be deducted from General Apportionment.

  40. Ed Jobs • Deductions will be made over five months - January through May. 20% will be deducted each month. • Amount will be reflected on your 1191 Report on Line C.9 – “Adjustment for Prior Year.” • Levy Base – Uses the total Guaranteed Entitlement from Line A.14. Levy base would not double count Ed Jobs funds discreetly since it is included in Line A.14.

  41. Apportionment Delay • Governor’s Supplement proposes that $253,000,000 of the June Apportionment payment will be delayed until July 1st. • $13 million set-aside for financial assistance to “cash poor districts” to be administered by OSPI.

  42. Financial Assistance Loans • Two discreet amounts in the Governor’s Supplemental Budget: • $15 million for district-needed assistance due to budget cuts. • $13 million for district due to Apportionment payment delay.

  43. Financial Assistance Loans • Monies provided are an advance on Apportionment to be repaid by June 2012. • Process of application is expected to be similar to the apportionment advance process detailed in the ABFR handbook. • Actual application process has not yet been developed.

  44. Financial Assistance Loans • Applications for June loans will require a number of assurances including one from the county treasurer that the county is unable to provide a loan or other assistance to the school district to accommodate the proposed one-day delay in June apportionment payment. • June applications are tentatively required to be filed with this office by mid-April.

  45. Financial Assistance Loans • OSPI will develop the application process and provide more information in February.

  46. Prototypical Funding Formula • OSPI has provided on-site training on the new SHB 2776 formula at all ESD locations. • All biennial budgets are expected to adopt the new prototypical funding formulae. The governor’s budget has adopted this.

  47. Prototypical Funding Formula • The following materials are available on our website under the SHB2776 link. • Excel Beta models showing calculations and comparison at the district and school level. • OSPI’s PowerPoints used during training.

  48. Prototypical Funding Formula • The values used in transitioning to the new prototypical funding formula were intended to be cost neutral. • Some breakage occurred; positive and negative. • The Governor’s proposed biennial budget provides funding for districts losing dollars.

  49. The “John Jenft” Sheet • The change to the new prototypical funding formula provides many-many more variables. • The revised John Jenft sheet is on our website and now encompasses 4 pages. • The first page covers the “typical” areas, the remaining three cover the full range of known variables that legislation could address.

More Related