1 / 10

EMTCT in Europe

EMTCT in Europe. 50. 100. 45. 90. 40. 80. 35. 70. MTCT rate (%). 30. 60. % of women on ART. Percent of women on ART. MTCT rate (%). 25. 50. 20. 40. 15. 30. 10. 20. 5. 10. 0. 0. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 00. 01. 02. 03. 04. n=. (32). (42).

donoma
Download Presentation

EMTCT in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EMTCT in Europe

  2. 50 100 45 90 40 80 35 70 MTCT rate (%) 30 60 % of women on ART Percent of women on ART MTCT rate (%) 25 50 20 40 15 30 10 20 5 10 0 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 n= (32) (42) (45) (39) (57) (51) (86) (82) (120) (192) (312) (452) (594) (802) (797) Year of birth MTCT rates, UK and Ireland, 1990-2011 3703 diagnosed women, 1990-2004 • Low rates of MTCT from diagnosed women 2000-2006 • Townsend et al. AIDS 2008; 22:973-81 • Overall MTCT 1.2% (61/5151, CI 0.9-1.5%) • 0.8% among 4864 women who received >14 days ART • Only 3 transmissions (0.1%) among 2117 women delivering with undetectable viral load CROI 2007 Poster 761, Townsend et al Current MTCT rate 2007-11 <1% All available at www.nshpc.ucl.ac.uk

  3. MTCT rates based on ELISA testing at 18 months, Ukraine, 2001-2009,

  4. Level of Validation Validation criteria to be met among: • General population • Key populations – additional studies and indicators to assess service coverage and impact

  5. MTCT rates among IDU in ECS cohort study, Ukraine, 2000-09

  6. Measuring impact of Thai National EMTCT programs ,2000-2012 couples HIV counseling and testing HAART for all CD4 >350 stop ARV • HAART for mother CD4<200,symptoms and AZT/NVP for CD4 > 200 cell/mm3 • - tail regimen (AZT+3TC) • AZT + single dose nevi rapine (NVP) • CD4 antepartum and every 6 month - Partner HIV testing - CD4 post partum and linkage to HIV care for mother and family -Short course zidovudine (AZT) -Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for all pregnant women -Formula feeding -HIV antibody testing for HIV-exposed infants at 12, 18 months 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 PHIMS version 1-2 ….........................................V 3 PHIMS version 3.1 PHOMS “Perinatal HIV outcome monitoring system” (4 provinces (2001), 14 provinces (2004) EID NAP ,NHSO Develop by Sarawut boonsuk ,DOH,MOPH,Thailand 2012

  7. PHIMSv3.1(update)Web-based ,Online system Community Hospital Provincial Health Office BMA - DMS Provincial Hospital Regional Hospital RHPC DOH -server/ analysis • System development & maintenance • Country data analysis Data utilization/analysis supervision Data entry /Utilization

  8. National Electronic Data base National AIDS Program, Outcome and impact monitoring Developed by National Health Security Office with technical support for PMTCT outcome report by GAP Thailand – U.S.CDC Since 2007 PMTCT menu

  9. Malawi (1) • N/A • Challenges in measuring PMTCT impact: • How to gain an accurate reflection of the national program impact while intervening to track “lost” patients and get them back into care • Estimating loss-to-follow-up across the cascade: Appropriate tools to track women from ANC to L&E to follow-up ART; • Tracking infants from delivery (live discharge) to follow-up care and final diagnosis • Study information for program improvement: • Identifying “holes” in the program: Where are we losing most ground in our EMTCT effort?

  10. Malawi (2) • Key gaps in current evaluation approach: • Connecting expanded VL and DNA-PCR services for the study to the broader National Lab strategy • EFV toxicity monitoring; separate study being considered • Future impact evaluation approaches: • WHO/CIDA funded evaluations starting soon • Impact of service delivery models on uptake, retention and adherence (ie. ART provided in ANC or ART clinic?) • Other evaluations planned but not yet underway by partners: UNC, Dignitas International

More Related