1 / 17

Making best use of EU Structural & Cohesion Funds

Making best use of EU Structural & Cohesion Funds for IN-KIND contributions to Research Infrastructures. Bucharest, 8 th October 2013. HEPTECH, Juan Tomás Hernani. ECONOMIC PULL. TECHNOLOGY. NAT. & REG. PROGRAMS. HOW TO CONTRIBUTE. €. SCIENTIFIC INFRAS. SERVICE. SCIENCE INPUT.

dora
Download Presentation

Making best use of EU Structural & Cohesion Funds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Making best use of EU Structural & Cohesion Funds for IN-KIND contributions to Research Infrastructures Bucharest, 8th October 2013. HEPTECH, Juan TomásHernani

  2. ECONOMIC PULL TECHNOLOGY NAT. & REG. PROGRAMS HOW TO CONTRIBUTE €

  3. SCIENTIFIC INFRAS. SERVICE SCIENCE INPUT Research Communities R+D PROGRAMS Industry Communities PARTNERSHIPS

  4. REQUIREMENTS & CONDITIONS ERDF ERDF Regional & Urban Policy CF ESF Social Policy

  5. WHERE WHAT FOR HOW MUCH WHO HOW

  6. WHERE SOUTH EAST

  7. HOW MUCH PL 72 RO 21 HU20 RO 21 160 € / p.p.a. 60 € / p.p.a. 20 € / p.p.a. Less DR Transition DR More DR SK 13 HR 8 LT 6 LV 4 EE 3 IT 29 ES 25 PT 19 SOUTH EAST

  8. WHAT FOR A 5.1 ERDF R+I Infrastructure, Centers of competence B Business investment in R+I, Nets, KETs 5.3 SMEs: Advanced capacities for Product Development C KET INVESTMENT FITS

  9. WHAT FOR FITS INTENSITY SSS 50-60% + • R+I / KETs • ICT • SMEs • Low Carbon 12-15% +

  10. WHO PROGRESS PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT COUNTRY/REGION Owner 1 Owner 2 O.P. O.P. OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FITS IN KIND

  11. HOW ESS Pathway ERDF IN KIND INSTRUMENT

  12. HOW More money? BARRIERS Support for KET? • Each item, only one EU financing mechanism YES Support for Activities abroad? YES • Inside an Operational Program YES • (within EU) • Local benefit • < 15% Program PRIORITY • < 5% TOTAL OK from Monitoring Committee

  13. Pre-Construction In-Kind • Altogether 81 WPs from 8 countries • Sept 17 PIKRC approved all 25 WPs presented • Total EUR 18.8m value approved by PIKRC • Expected total Pre-construction IKC value after last PIKRC in November: EUR 30m

  14. Call for Expressions of Interest

  15. Preliminary analysis of EOI responses Austria Belgium Canada Denmark Estonia France Germany Hungary Italy Norway Poland Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland UK USA 17 countries 33 Organizations 40 Companies • Total 100 responses (Today) • Altogether 500 WP proposals • About 50% from Public Organizations • About 50% from Companies Including WPs not identified as IKC potential • Including different level of responses

  16. ESS In-kind Contributions - Potential Total Cost: € 1.843BEstimated IKC: € 730M Target station € 174 M Total € 113 M IKC Accelerator € 563 M Total € 422 M IKC Instruments € 389 M Total € 195 M IKC In-kind Cash

  17. Thank You

More Related