1 / 33

Winning Economy

Winning Economy. Premachandra Athukorala Arndt- Corden Department of Economics College of Asia and the Pacific Australian National University 19 October, 2012. Sri Lanka’s Post-conflict Development Challenge.

dora
Download Presentation

Winning Economy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Winning Economy PremachandraAthukorala Arndt-Corden Department of Economics College of Asia and the Pacific Australian National University 19 October, 2012

  2. Sri Lanka’s Post-conflict Development Challenge

  3. ‘The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economists. … soon or later it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil’. John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, 1936, pp.383-4.

  4. Purpose/scope To inform the policy debate on the post conflict development strategy: What are the achievements of liberalization reforms initiated in 1977? What are the implications of recent policy shifts for the sustainability of these achievements in the context of global economic slowdown? Is there a case for reverting to the past paradigm of inward oriented, state-centered development strategy?

  5. Structure 1. Historical context 2. Recent policy shifts 3. Economic performance 4. Concluding remarks

  6. Historical context (‘Past is the prelude to the future’) Sri Lankan economy at independence: one of Asia’s most promising new nations. ‘The best bet in Asia’ ‘An oasis of piece and stability’ See Table 2

  7. Era of state-led, import substitution, late 1950s- 1977 By 1970s Sri Lankan economy was one of the most inward oriented and regulated outside the communist block • Poor relative growth performance - Diminished connectivity in the global economy (Figures 1)

  8. Figure 2: Trade Orientation of the Sri Lankan Economy, 1959-2010 (%)

  9. Liberalisation reforms First wave: started in 1977 Second wave: started in 1989/90 By the mid-1990s, Sri Lanka had become one of the most open economies in the developing work. Reforms received bipartisan support: further reforms in the second half of 1990s Reform process lost momentum from about the late 1990s, because of the escalation of the separatist war.

  10. Reform outcome A dramatic transformation of the economy despite continuing civil war and the resultant macroeconomic instability Emergence of the private sector as the engine of economic growth. An annual average growth rate of over 5% Increase in manufacturing share in GDP from 10% in the mid 1970s to over 20% by 2000

  11. Export diversification: ending of heavy primary-commodity dependence, reversing the prolonged (1955-1975) deterioration in the terms of trade (Figure 3) Emergence of export-oriented manufacturing as the major generator of domestic employment.

  12. Figure 3: Sri Lanka: Barter Terms of Trade (BTT) and Income Terms of Trade (ITT), 1948-2000 (1990 = 100)

  13. Notes to Figure 3 BTT = PX/PM , where PX is the export price index and PM import price index (This is what we normally call ‘the terms of trade. ITT = [PX/PM]*QX, where QX is the export volume index. ITT measures import purchasing power of total; export earnings.

  14. 2. Recent Policy Shifts Backsliding from liberalisation reforms from about 2005, in particular after the ending of the separatist war in 2009

  15. Trade policy regime Increased complexity of the import duty (tariff) stature: a number of import taxes (para-tariffs and other) in addition to customs duties; Notable increase in the average levels import duties (tariffs) (Table 2) Increased variability of t rates among tariff lines (increased cascading nature) New export taxes (promoting resource-based industrialisation) Greater emphasis on free trade agreement (origin complications)

  16. Table 2: Sri Lanka: Unweighted Average Protection Rates, 2002, 2004, 2009 and 2011

  17. FDI policy The Strategic Development Project (SDP) Act (2008) - leaves room for ample discretion in the investment approval process Revival of Underperforming Enterprises and Underutilised Assets Act (November 2011) - empowered the government to acquire and manage 37 ‘under performing enterprises A minimum, across-the-board, capital requirement for FDI projects to become eligible for five-year tax holiday (US$ 500,000) (Malaysia 65,000; Thailand 65,000; South Korea 50,000, India 2,100)

  18. FDI policy (continued) Heavy emphasis placed on ‘domestic value added’ (or domestic content) in approving new projects (discuss inconsistency of this criterion with promoting FDI in an era of economic globalisation

  19. State-owned enterprise Abandoning the privatization program following change of government in 2005. Renationalisation of some previously privatised firms and some fresh nationalisations. Loss-making SOEs have become a huge drain on the government budget.

  20. Macroeconomic policy ‘Stable exchange rate regime’ (2005- February 2012) and real exchange rate appreciation (Figure 4) Managed floating since February 2012. Discuss The link between nominal and real exchange rate. The link between budget deficit, current account deficit and the future course of the nominal exchange rate (Box 1 and Box 2)

  21. Figure 4: Sri Lanka: Real exchange rate and its components, 2004Q1 – 2012Q2

  22. Real exchange rate RER = [NER*PW]/PD ------------- Current account balance (CAB) and the budget deficit CAB = (S - I) + (TX - TR - G) = (S - I) + (TX - TR - G) (8) = private sector balance + public sector balance (or budget deficit/surplus)

  23. Sri Lanka in 2011 (% of GDP) CAB = private sector balance + public sector balance -7.8 = -0.9 - 6.9 (Source: Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Annual Report 2011, Key Economic Indicators)

  24. 3. Economic Performance In terms of the standard indicators (GDP growth rate, per capita income, unemployment rate, inflation etc) growth performance in the immediate post-conflict period looks impressive, but these indicators hide a number of concern regarding the sustainability of growth

  25. The main drivers of growth are the non-tradable sectors (construction, transport, utilities and trade and other services). The doubling of per capita income in current US$ partly reflects domestic inflation and the artificial stability of the exchange rate during 2005- Feb 2012 (Figure 5). The decline in the unemployment rate was largely dote public sector recruitments and labour outmigration.

  26. Figure 5: Sri Lanka, per capital GDP in current and constant (2000) price (US$),1970-2010

  27. External payments position remains fragile: • current account deficit has widened (poor export performance, faster import growth despite increased import duties) • Net foreign reserves are very low (Figure 6) • The share of non-concessional loans in total external debt increased from 7.3% to 42.9% in 2011.

  28. Figure 6: Sri Lanka’s International Reserves(in Billions of US$)

  29. A number of export-oriented foreign firms seems to have stopped operations (and/or left the country). The budget deficit as a percentage of GDP is very high (2010: 9.9%; 2001: 6.6%)

  30. 4. Concluding Remarks The Sri Lankan experience under liberalisation reforms has clearly demonstrated that an outward-oriented policy regime can yield a superior development outcome compared to a closed-economy regime, even under severe strains of a protracted ethnic conflict and macroeconomic instability. Viewed against this backdrop, recent developments in the Sri Lankan policy scene do not seem to augur well for the future of the Sri Lankan economy. Policies based on the past paradigm of inward oriented, state centred development offer no viable long term solution to the huge challenges facing Sri Lanka in face of a global economy that is in deeper trouble than at any time since the 1930s.

  31. Thank you.

More Related