1 / 54

California Greyhound Bus Network

California Greyhound Bus Network. LT Catherine Long LT James Koffi. Agenda. Background Problem/Model Scenario Network Model Interdiction Takeaways/Further Research Summary/Conclusions Recommendations. Greyhound Bus Network.

doyle
Download Presentation

California Greyhound Bus Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. California Greyhound Bus Network LT Catherine Long LT James Koffi

  2. Agenda • Background • Problem/Model Scenario • Network Model • Interdiction • Takeaways/Further Research • Summary/Conclusions • Recommendations

  3. Greyhound Bus Network • Greyhound serves more than 3,800 destinations in North America and employs around 7,800 staff. • Greyhound operated nearly 5.5 billion passenger miles last year. • The U.S. operation, as well as its operating subsidiaries and Greyhound Canada, carried nearly 18 million people.

  4. Greyhound Bus Network • Intercity bus is the safest mode of transportation over cars, trucks, trains, planes and other commercial vehicles, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation • The Greyhound active fleet consists of about 1,775 buses, with an average age of 9.4 years. • One Greyhound bus takes an average of 19 cars off the road, and achieves 170 passenger miles per gallon of fuel.

  5. Real World

  6. Inside New Greyhound Bus • YouTube Video • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_0Gz-Ie8T0&feature=channel&list=UL

  7. Problem • The price of gas is expensive, and routes between stations vary throughout the state • New buses save gas and will keep up with the competition (Mega Bus, etc.) • What is the fastest and most cost effective way to transition 50 new express buses from two major Greyhound stations to other stations around the state of California?

  8. Model Scenario • Model distributes 50 new buses throughout CA • Use GAMS to model the flow of buses to new stations and demonstrate how an “attack,” such as a major earthquake, impacts the network • The “attacks” model the worst case scenario and completely disable edge

  9. Nodes and Arcs • The nodes in model represent stations • The arcs represent routes from one station to another • Route information is from the Greyhound website • Supply nodes are Oakland and Los Angeles

  10. Road Map of California

  11. Network Model T S

  12. Network Model Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  13. Measure of Effectiveness • The measure of effectiveness (MOE) for this model is to minimize the total cost of the flow of buses to their destination cities • Cost = $/gallon x miles per edge • Each city besides the supply cities receives 2 brand new buses

  14. Model Assumptions • Assume all new Greyhound buses get 6.5 miles per gallon • Cost per gallon of diesel is $4.00 • Edge capacities are never exceeded in our model

  15. Greyhound Network Restrictions • Many cities are connected by narrow two way roads which are prohibited for use by Greyhound or any bus/motorhome in CA due to handling issues. • Bus:California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 233 defines "bus" as: "(a) …any vehicle… …designed, used, or maintained for carrying more than 15 persons including the driver” • This is one of the major limitations to the network.

  16. Operator’s/Attacker’s Problem • The model is run without interdiction to establish a baseline total minimum cost of $3,246.80 • Run the model with increasing attacks to determine network resiliency • GAMS chooses routes that will maximize the total cost after each “attack”

  17. Network Model With 1 Attack Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 12624.40 4 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  18. Network Model With 2 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 17410.5 6 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  19. Network Model With 3 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 22061.20 8 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  20. Network Model With 4 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 31341.60 12 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  21. Network Model With 5 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 36127.7 14 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  22. Network Model With 6 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 36581.80 14 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  23. Network Model With 7 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 40844.80 16 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  24. Network Model With 8 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 41639.90 16 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  25. Network Model With 9 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 42023.90 16 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  26. Network Model With 10 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 42362.30 16 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  27. Network Model With 11 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 43136.50 16 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  28. Network Model With 12 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 43146.30 16 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  29. Analysis • Can model resiliency be improved with an additional supply node in Bakersfield? • Yes, but it only changes the model slightly…

  30. Network Model With 1 Attack Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 12292.10 4 buses unable to reach Oceanside and San Diego Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  31. Network Model With 2 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 17078.20 4 buses unable to reach Oceanside and San Diego Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  32. Network Model With 3 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 21728.90 6buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  33. Network Model With 4 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 31009.30 12 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  34. Network Model With 5 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 35795.30 14 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  35. Network Model With 6 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 40512.50 14 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  36. Network Model With 7 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 40512.50 16buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  37. Network Model With 8 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 40870.60 16 buses unable to destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  38. Network Model With 9 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 41094.60 16 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  39. Network Model With 10 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 41401.10 16 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  40. Network Model With 11 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 41759.20 16 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  41. Network Model With 12 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 41996.80 16 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  42. Network Model With 13 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 42043.60 16 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  43. Network Model With 14 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 42053.40 16 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  44. Operator’s Resilience Curve

  45. Results • The most costly “attacks” occur with the first attack and the fourth attack • Attack #1: 12624.40 - 3,246.80 = $9377.60 • Attack #4: 31341.60 - 22061.20 = $9280.40

  46. Network Model With 1 Attack Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Riverside Cost = 12624.40 Difference 12624.40 - 3,246.80 = 9377.60 4 buses unable to reach destination Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  47. Network Model With 3 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 22061.20 8 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  48. Network Model With 4 Attacks Sacramento Vallejo Santa Rosa Stockton Oakland Modesto San Francisco T Merced Santa Jose Santa Cruz Fresno Los Banos Salinas King City Coalinga Jct Bakersfield San Luis Obispo Indio S Santa Maria Palmdale Victorville Oxnard Cost = 31341.60 Difference = 31341.60 - 22061.20 = 9280.40 12 buses unable to reach destination Riverside Los Angeles Indio Oceanside San Diego

  49. Model Comparison • The additional supply station in Bakersfield decreased overall cost by $1,093.00 after 14 attacks • In the scenario with 3 supply stations Bakersfield started out by supplying just 4 new buses • By the 14th attack, Bakersfield supplies 14 buses • The more supply nodes the better, however may not be cost effective for Greyhound to have so many bus contracts

  50. Future Analysis/Recommendations • Change the probability of destruction based on location, i.e. if on a fault line • Additional routes could be added to local roads and streets that connect the major interstates to build more redundancy in the network, but must abide to California state laws

More Related