1 / 11

Ratification of international human rights treaties

Ratification of international human rights treaties. OHCHR Treaty Body Capacity Building Programme. DISTINCTION OF TERMS. Signature Ratification Accession. DISTINCTION OF TERMS - DEFINITIONS. Signature

dreginald
Download Presentation

Ratification of international human rights treaties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ratification of international human rights treaties OHCHR Treaty Body Capacity Building Programme

  2. DISTINCTION OF TERMS • Signature • Ratification • Accession

  3. DISTINCTIONOF TERMS - DEFINITIONS Signature Expresses the willingness of the signatory state to continue the treaty-making process. The signature qualifies the signatory state to proceed to ratification, acceptance or approval. It also creates an obligation to refrain, in good faith, from acts that would defeat the object and the purpose of the treaty.

  4. DISTINCTION OF TERMS- DEFINITIONS Ratification Ratification defines the international act whereby a state indicates its consent to be legally bound to a treaty.

  5. DISTINCTION OF TERMS - DEFINITIONS Accession • Act whereby a state accepts the opportunity to become a party to a treaty. It has the same legal effect as ratification. Accession usually occurs after the treaty has entered into force. • The Secretary-General of the United Nations, as depositary, has also accepted accessions to some conventions before their entry into force.

  6. Ratification of treaties and reservations

  7. Ratifications of OptionalProtocolsand acceptance of individual communications

  8. FREQUENT ARGUMENTS AGAINST RATIFICATION • Lack of technical & financial resources and capacity • Reporting requirement as an obstacle • Not an imminent priority • The idea that a State must be in full compliance with a treaty before it can be ratified (not correct as such)

  9. RATIFICATION: WHAT’S IN IT FOR US? • Human rights treaties provide a legal basis and structure to support internationally agreed development goals (reflected in regional/national development strategies) • Strong link human rights-development: Measures at the domestic level need to be taken to ensure that legislation and policies conform to international standards

  10. RATIFICATION: WHAT’S IN IT FOR US?- ARGUMENTS 1. Provides a legal regime of accountability; 2. Enables the realization of human rights and strengthens adherence to the rule of law; 3. Provides an opportunity to strengthen cooperation within government; 4. Provides an opportunity to strengthen cooperation with civil society on specific human rights issues;

  11. RATIFICATION: WHAT’S IN IT FOR US?- ARGUMENTS 5. Provides an opportunity to receive international expert advice on improving the human rights situation; 6. Improves the international profile of countries; 7. Encourages a more effective system of aid, technical support and global justice; 8. SDGs will only be sustainable if State’s human rights obligations are respected and strengthened.

More Related