190 likes | 201 Views
PRINCIPLES AND BOUNDARIES: Developing a new counselling standard. Workshop discussion document Botswana SAACDHE Conference: September 2009 Presenters: R Connelly & D de la Harpe. Outline. Introduction Role clarification & workshop outcomes Group introductions
E N D
PRINCIPLES AND BOUNDARIES: Developing a new counselling standard • Workshop discussion document • Botswana • SAACDHE Conference: September 2009 • Presenters: R Connelly & D de la Harpe
Outline • Introduction • Role clarification & workshop outcomes • Group introductions • Group discussion: existing institutional context • Presentation: theoretical framework • Group discussion: new strategies / models for building faculty partnerships * Revisiting support networks • Evaluation
Introduction INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE: Admission & Retention COUNSELLING CHALLENGE: The potential to become involved is too often constrained by…
Partnerships RETENTION
Why are these collaborative relationships important? BENEFITS FOR FACULTY: attracting and retaining the most able and highly committed students to their programs. BENEFITS FOR COUNSELLORS: Collaboration provides avenues for our services to be more deeply embedded in the academic culture
Roles & Outcomes • Roles • Interactive: Facilitative / consultative / participatory vs prescriptive / teaching • Outcomes • Provide a workspace for counselling staff to reflect on and plan for new strategies in engaging with academic staff. • To facilitate an exchange and cross-pollination of ideas to empower and equip.
Who are we? • INTRODUCE YOUR GROUP • Institution name? • How many counsellors do you have (overall)? • How many faculties have you got (overall)?
Group discussion: existing institutional context PLANNING PARTNERSHIPS • Describe inhibiting factors • STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIPS • Describe existing partnerships • How were these formed • With whom? • How are they maintained? • What works well (strategies) • What hasn’t worked / challenges
Summary of referral process Faculty Referrals Warned Excluded LEC assessment Individual feedback / mgmt plan Recommendation to faculty (Excl) Follow up monitoring sessions / ROADMAP KEYS / Qualitative assessment informed by tracking retention / progress
Broadening of the referral process Faculty Bursary holders Referrals (GM / Financial Aid) Warned Excluded Developmental reactive / remedial / preventative … proactive LEC assessment Challenges
Broadening of the referral process Faculty Bursary holders Referrals (GM / Financial Aid) Early Identification Warned Excluded Developmental proactive reactive / remedial / preventative … proactive LEC assessment Challenges
Broadening of the referral process Faculty Bursary holders Referrals (GM / Financial Aid) Early Identification Warned Excluded Developmental proactive reactive / remedial / preventative … proactive
Group discussion: the way forward • Strategies • Building / implementing partnerships with academic stakeholders