220 likes | 915 Views
Deterrence and Rational Choice Theories. Medieval Criminal Justice. Trial by ordeal Forced confessions Severe public punishment Burning (hell on earth) Mutilation (body subordinate to soul) “Ritual of a thousand deaths”. A Reform Movement. The Enlightenment
E N D
Medieval Criminal Justice • Trial by ordeal • Forced confessions • Severe public punishment • Burning (hell on earth) • Mutilation (body subordinate to soul) • “Ritual of a thousand deaths”
A Reform Movement • The Enlightenment • Faith in rationality, social contract theory • Depart from “supernatural” theory • The Classical School of criminology is born • Assumptions about human nature • Rational, autonomous, hedonistic, calculating
A Theory of Deterrence • On Crimes and Punishment, Beccaria (1764) • Punishment protects the social contract • Punishment should fit the crime, no more • Underlying theory • Prevention through deterrence is the primary justification for punishment • Condemned by the Catholic Church
Principles of Deterrence • To deter, punishment should be: • Certain • To increase fear of consequences • Swift • To make association with punishment • Severe enough to outweigh the pleasure of crime • Any more is “tyrannical,” inefficient
Elaborations of Deterrence • Specific v. general • Punishment v. non-punishment • Absolute v. restrictive • Formal v. informal sanctions
Punishment/Non-Punishment Stafford and Warr (1993) • Personal experience with punishment • Personal experience avoiding punishment • Vicarious experience with punishment • Vicarious experience avoiding punishment • Determines the deterrent effect
Absolute v. Restrictive Deterrence • Absolute deterrence • Abstention • Restrictive deterrence • Less frequent • Less severe • Displacement
Empirical Research • There is moderate support for certainty, little to none for severity • Why does certainty seem to work better than severity? What does this tell us about how offenders think?
Formal v. Informal Sanctions • Informal = unofficial punishment • Disapproval from significant others • Feelings of remorse, guilt, shame • Expands the range of negative consequence • Informal sanctions enhance formal sanctions • But not for everyone, why?
In and Out and Back In Favor • Deterrence theory fell out of favor in the 1800s, replaced by positivism • Deterrence reemerged in the late 1960s as a rationale for punishment • Coincided with a renewed emphasis on offender deterrence and retribution within the criminal justice system
Practical Limits of Deterrence • Penalties often learned after arrest • Underestimate risk of being caught • Clearance rates are generally low • Crime displacement may occur • Rational abilities may be impaired • Drugs, alcohol, passion, mental disorder • Some people have little to lose
From Deterrenceto Rational Choice • Deterrence theory focuses on the effect of punishment on criminal choices • Rational choice theory focuses on the effect of opportunity on criminal choices
Rational Choice Theory • Crime benefits the offender • Crime brings pleasure • People’s rationality is bounded • We gather, store, & use information imperfectly • We tend to focus on immediate gains, not long-term costs • Offenders focus on situational opportunities • Criminals are opportunistic
Rational Motivationsfor Crime • To obtain something • To obtain pleasure • To obtain sex • To obtain peer approval • To prove toughness • To escape negative or unwanted situations • To assert dominance or get one’s way in a dispute • To settle a grievance, revenge
Rational Choices? • A man beats his wife during an argument • A father rapes his stepdaughter • A man drives home drunk from a bar
Cheating on Exams • How would we control cheating using a rational choice perspective? • Assumptions about cheating • Interventions to prevent cheating
Assessment of Choice Theory • Opportunity rather than punishment • Offenders tend to ignore long-term costs • Situational factors rather than enduring motivational factors • Assume the presence of criminal motivation • Focus on offenders’ assessments of their immediate situations
Implications for Policy • Situational crime prevention • Reduce crime by blocking opportunities • Consistent with the CJ emphasis on responsibility and punishment • All crime is based at least in part on a choice • Attempt to make criminal choices less attractive by reducing opportunities