270 likes | 467 Views
National Professional Development Center on ASD. Lisa Sullivan MIND Institute, UC Davis. National Professional Development Center on ASD. Where we began and where we are now The future of the Center Your work in Idaho and other states. Goals of NPDC.
E N D
National Professional Development Center on ASD Lisa Sullivan MIND Institute, UC Davis
National Professional Development Center on ASD • Where we began and where we are now • The future of the Center • Your work in Idaho and other states
Goals of NPDC Promote effective use of evidence-based practices (EBP) to support optimal student and family outcomes Develop successful teams of implementers through sustainable technical assistance and professional development Translate research into practice
Bridge the Gap Research-based practices Replicable practices in the classroom
State Involvement to Date VT MN WI ID MI RI IN CA VA KY NM Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Cohort 4 TX
Systems Approach • State leadership involvement • Establish infrastructure and resources for change • Recruit teams • Local and state coaches • School sites & families • Start with targeted change • Support sustainability
Implementation Science andSystems Change School Sites and School Districts Model Programs Regions State Wide Across Systems
Promoting Real Change • Implementation Science Research • Change happens at different levels • Change takes time and requires organizational shifts and reflection • Sustainability must be built in to process National Implementation Research Network, Fixsen & Blase (2007)
Summary of Activities • Introductory Online Course • Intensive Summer Training • Introduction to EBP, Measurement Tools and Protocol • Prioritize student goals • Monthly Coaching and Consultation • Team meetings • Data collection, assessment, feedback • Monitoring progress and modifying plans
NPDC Website • http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/
Site Descriptions (2007- 2012) • 12 states; 61 model/expansion sites • 10 preschools • 27 elementary schools • 13 middle schools • 11 high schools • Breakdown by type of program • 51% are self-contained programs • 49% are inclusive programs
Outcomes of NPDC Partnerships Overall Program Quality Individual Student Progress Use of Evidence-Based Practice Family Satisfaction Data represent the first 28 model sites
Assessing Program Quality Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS) • Designed to assess quality indicators of programs for students with ASD
Description of Scaling Consists of a five point range of performances for students: -2 Much less than expected(present level) -1 Somewhat less than expected 0 Expected level of outcome (annual goal) +1 Somewhat more than expected +2 Much more than expected
Family Program Satisfaction Effect Size .24 19
NPDC • What’s next?
NPDC Updates • Qualitative Study • Manual of Procedures (MOP) • Coaching Manual • Creating additional videos for modules(?) • Piloting early intervention materials thanks to Autism Speaks grant • Updating List of EBP based on recent research / literature review
State Partners Examples from other states • Michigan – START • California – CAPTAINS • Texas – Using NPDC model statewide • New Mexico
Systems Change / Implementation Science Resources • http://sisep.fpg.unc.edu/resources
Thank You! • Families & children • School teams • State and Local Trainers • State Leaders • NPDC Team
Contact Info • lhsullivan@ucdavis.edu