260 likes | 461 Views
Standard Setting in High-Definition Television (HDTV). Color Television. The color TV technology used in the US today is known as the National Television Systems Committee (NTSC) system.
E N D
Color Television • The color TV technology used in the US today is known as the National Television Systems Committee (NTSC) system. • In 1941, RCA, the owner of NBC and a leading manufacturer of black-and-white sets, was a powerful force in the radio and television world. • Throughout the 1940s, CBS, the leading TV network, was pushing for the adoption of the mechanical color TV system it was developing.
New Technology vs. Old Technology • When a new technology is invented, there are a few interesting questions. • The effects of compatibility between two different generation of technologies on firms and customers?
Old Hardware Old Software New Hardware New Software Backward compatible Forward compatible Compatibility
Compatibility • Non-compatible: Nintendo • Backward compatible: • CD/DVD, • Sony PS/PS2, • MS DOS/Window O/S, • BW/Color TV • Forward compatible: • BW/Color TV, • Color/HDTV
For increasing the adoption of color TV, which one is better? • (1) B/W can receive color TV signal. • (2) B/W cannot receive color TV signal.
Color Television • The FCC adopted the CBS system in Oct 1950 • A major obstacle for the CBS system was that it was not backward-compatible: B/W sets would not be able to receive color program. • CBS had no manufacturing capability and no allianceswith manufacturers.
A Historical Comparison: Adoption of Color Television • Since a major consumers with B/W TVs could not receive color TV signals, limited programs in color were available. • To customers, color sets offer little added value because of the limited programs in color.
The FCC officially reversed its 1950 decision so that B/W TV sets could receive color TV signals. • Then, the number of programs in color increases. • Forward compatibility increased the color TV adoption.
Color Television • TV system has three major components: programming, distribution equipment and reception equipment. • The effects of compatibility, a direct effect and an indirect effect.
PAL/NTSC Performance Limitations • Flickering and ghosting • Low resolution (more apparent as TV sets become larger) • It requires cutting off the side panels in showing material shot for exhibition on wide movie screens.
Promise and Lure of HDTV • Picture quality - equivalent to 35mm film by using roughly 1,000 lines • The higher resolution permits much closer viewing • Screen aspect ratio (the ratio of screen’s width to its height) - 16:9 • Compared with NTSC’s 4:3 • A wider screen reduces the “picture in the box” feeling of current television and allows standard 35mm movies to be viewed. • Sound quality - equivalent to compact disks
Adoption of HDTV • For HDTV to succeed, HDTV programming must be available, HDTV signals must be delivered to home, and consumers must purchase HDTV receivers and videotape machines
HDTV Development in the U.S. • To broadcasters as a group HDTV was a threat, not a promise • HDTV increase their costs considerably, e.g. transmission equipment costs $38m • They cannot charge more for an improved service • They only benefit if viewers watched more TV. They probably would but not by much because on average each TV household already watches seven hours a day.
HDTV Development in the U.S. • Each individually might want to adopt HDTV, but as a group all might be worse off • A prisoners’ dilemma structure among broadcasters
HDTV Development in the U.S. • In broadcasting, they could do that to prevent HDTV’s adoption: • They discourage FCC from moving quickly to set standards for HDTV • The claim that the already developed technology was unsuitable and delay any implementation
Competition for spectrum at the FCC • FCC considered reallocating some unused parts of TV’s ultrahigh frequency band (UHF) to cellular service
HDTV Development in the U.S. • Broadcasting has traditionally been organized around local stations • These terrestrial broadcasters face increasing competition • Cable TV • Direct broadcast satellites - signals sent to home satellite dishes • Fiber optic networks to homes
Evaluating HDTV using the Criteria • HDTV signals can easily be sent via cable or via satellite signals that do not use the crowded and valuable portion of spectrum suitable for ground-to-ground transmissions
Scarce Spectrum Allocating Criteria • Scarce Spectrum should be reserved for applications that • are highly valued; and • cannot easily be offered without using such spectrum
Spectrum uses • A new generation of TV presents an opportunity to reconfigure use of the spectrum • Provide TV service via satellite or via cable • Can free up critical spectrum space for a number of alternative technologies for future use • But FCC decided to fit HDTV into the already crowded terrestrial TV spectrum
Spectrum Issues and the FCC • Major social cost of implementing HDTV through terrestrial broadcast is the use of scarce spectrum space
Results of Terrestrial HDTV • A heavily squeezed HDTV system • Extra costs • Compromised quality • Reduced scope for later enhancements • Less spectrum available for other uses • Even less spectrum for other uses when additional spectrum was allocated to existing terrestrial broadcasters to reduce interference between adjacent channels
Other Major Decisions by FCC • FCC decided to protect the installed base in the hands of consumers as well as to protect the existing broadcast industry • It decided that the introduction of HDTV must not strand owners of existing sets
Other Major Decisions by FCC • Either the HDTV standard must be receiver compatible or else NTSC broadcasts must be “simulcast” alongside HDTV broadcasts during a probably long transition period • FCC has decided to use a simulcast approach