140 likes | 278 Views
Economic impact of independence. Disruption of civil wars & troop migrations livestock herds & crops depleted mines & plantations deteriorated reductions or end to tribute & slave trade loss of many peninsulares Governments in significant debt ability to collect taxes decreased
E N D
Economic impact of independence Disruption of civil wars & troop migrations livestock herds & crops depleted mines & plantations deteriorated reductions or end to tribute & slave trade loss of many peninsulares Governments in significant debt ability to collect taxes decreased Hacienda dominance continued little government interference w/rural “caudillos”
Why independence did not spur economic expansion: • No land redistribution to stimulate growth vs. westward expansion in U.S. • Frequent wars & political transitions highly militarized societies civil wars economically disruptive • Little foreign investment, due to instability
Brazilian independence 1808 Portuguese court moved to Rio de J. 1815 King made Brazil a co-kingdom 1820 Portuguese liberals established constitutional monarchy • demanded return of king 1821 King returned to Lisbon; left son in Rio 1822 Pedro declared himself emperor of independent Brazil—bloodless
caudillos politico-military leaders who held power on the national & regional level in mid-19th c. Latin America, before more stable parliamentary government became the norm (c. 1870)
caudillo patronage Local warlords, often of humble provincial origins Spurred by regionalism disconnection between centers & hinterlands Strong men in patron-client networks power outside of formal institutions Exercised personal authority (charisma) Backed by violence & support of lesser caudillos Elections conducted, but largely a fiction votes counted by parties in power, ballots open
caudillo patronage Caudillo as most powerful person looking out for regional interests Loyalty to him based on personal (family) and regional alliances Votes as a sign of support, rewarded with political positions & legal favors
19th c. conservatism “political inertia” of colonial elite great landowners, clergy, military officers, heads of merchant houses Favored: centralized government retention of church & military fueros • Distrustful of enlightenment radicalism • Paternalistic toward indigenous & slaves
19th c. liberalism Enlightenment ideology: individual liberty, rational progress Middle class: provincial landowners, professionals, small merchants Federalist, to aid provincial growth Opposed: clerical and military fueros corporate landholding by church or indigenous • Impressed by U.S. example of capitalist modernization
Mexico 1825-1850 1824 constitution a liberal-conservative compromise • federalist structure (19 states) & 2-house legislature • Catholicism as official religion; fueros maintained 1833 liberal president pushed reforms through Congress • abolished fueros; reduced army • secularized Univ. of Mexico & public schools • infrastructural improvements to provinces 1836 conservative constitution (Lopez de Santa Anna) • restored central gov’t authority & fueros • set high property & income requirements for office holders 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo: loss of TX, CA, New Mexico
Central America, 1825-1850 1823 Federal Republic of Central America abolished slavery & fueros promoted free trade 1826-1829 civil war won by liberal reformers 1837-1842 war won by conservatives • aided by indians opposed to land breakup Restored communal property, church authority, tribute & corregidores
Venezuela, 1930s 1820s liberal reforms for Gran Colombia: abolished slavery & tribute expanded education divided communal lands: seized church property to support education 1830s conservative backlash, disintegration: land concentration had increased during wars Venezuelan constitution limited suffrage to literate adult males of high income