1 / 20

Peter Bellwood and Eusebio Dizon

The batanes Archaeological Project and the “Out of taiwan ” Hypothesis for austronesian Dispersal. Peter Bellwood and Eusebio Dizon. Austronesian Migration Theory.

edythe
Download Presentation

Peter Bellwood and Eusebio Dizon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The batanes Archaeological Project and the “Out of taiwan” Hypothesis for austronesian Dispersal Peter Bellwood and Eusebio Dizon

  2. Austronesian Migration Theory • Austronesian Migration Theory propounds on the expansion of a group of people called the Austronesians from Asia into the Pacific by means of Taiwan 6,000 years ago. It was a theory proposed by Peter Bellwood a professor of Archeology. The theory largely explains the similarities in culture, language and physical attributes in different countries in the most Asian countries. • The Austronesian migrations began from the Chinese mainland, reaching Taiwan first in 3500 BC then the Philippines by 3000 BC. They reached Sumatra and Java by 2000 BC, Northern New Guinea by 1600 BC, Samoa by 1200 BC, Hawaii, Easter Island, and Madagascar by 500 AD, etc. *from Wiki

  3. The Batanes Islands • Northern edge of the tropics • 150 km from the southern tip of Taiwan • 200 km from the north coast of Luson • Separated from Luzon by the Balintang Channel and Babuyan Islands. From Taiwan by Bashi Channel.

  4. The Batanes Islands

  5. The Batanes Islands • Seemingly first settled by Neolithic populations • Presumably the ancestors of the present Ivatan and Itbayaten populations. • Neolithic people had a fully-fledged polished stone technology. • BUT WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?

  6. The Batanes Islands • Sea Beds depths in Bashi Channel – at least 1000m • To deep to be affected by the Pleistocene sea level fluctuations. • Early humans never walked from Taiwan to Luzon.

  7. Batanes Cultural Sequence • Named after sites on Batan Island • 3 Provisional Chronological Phase • Sunget Phase – between 3500 and 2700 BP • Naidi Phase – 2500 to 1500/1000 BP • Rakwaydi Phase – 1000 BP to ethnographic times *BP – Before Present

  8. Batanes Cultural Sequence • Pre – 4500 BP – no evidence for a human presence in Batanes • The OLDEST human activity(pottery) is dated 4450-4080 BP. Sunget was occupied from 3200 BP. • Ethnographic Itbayaten and Ivatan cultures – widely established on Batan after the Iraya eruption of AD 1000.

  9. The Excavated Sites • Torongan Cave, Itbayat • Would have provided a landing place for early settlers who could have beached their canoes in the lower cave. • A specific item from the cave with Taiwan affinity is a waisted stone hoe of igneous or metamorphic rock.

  10. The Excavated Sites • Sunget, central Batan • Cultural deposits have almost identical dates on two locations on food residues dated between 3200 and 2950 BP. • Materials found were Neolithic(no metal was found) related to Neolithic date in Taiwan. • Sunget pottery in mainly red-slipped and resembled the handles on northern and eastern Taiwan pottery.

  11. The Excavated Sites • Sunget artifacts include large numbers of notched and flat ovate pebble “sinkers” of a type also common all over Taiwan from Dabenkeng Early Neolithic times onwards. • Never found Sunget Phase materials in caves or rock shelters.(except in Mavatoy shelter on Batan)

  12. The Excavated Sites

  13. Anaro and Naidi, 2500 BP to mid/late first Millennium AD • Naidi Phase assemblages continue on Batan Island with red-slipped but unstamped pottery, with rim forms differing from those of the Sunget Phase. • Pottery of Naidi Phase – very widespread on Batan Island. • Suggests that a large population was already occupying on Batan by 2500 BP.

  14. Anaro, Itbayat • Most Remarkable site of the Naidi Phase • Artifacts include : • pottery sherds • pig bones • objects of Taiwan slate(including fragments of projectile points and knives) • pieces of worked Fengtien nephrite(sourced near Hualien, in eastern Taiwan).

  15. Anaro, Itbayat

  16. Anaro, Itbayat

  17. Anaro, Itbayat • 2000 years of continuing contact between Taiwan and the Philippines makes one wonder about the voyaging skills and linguistic connections between the populations concerned.

  18. Where the Batanes islands(with lanyu) the extra-formosan homeland? • Evidence from Torongan and Sunget that supports a Taiwan to Batanes(and Luzon) north-to-south colonizing directionality includes: • Pottery vessel forms in sites(rim shapes, surface red slip and Sunget handles. • The Torongan waisted hoe • The Sunget items of Taiwan slate and nephrite • The notched stone sinkers. EVIDENCE FAVOURS BATANES as being reached before LUZON.

  19. Where the Batanes islands(with lanyu) the extra-formosan homeland? • Evidence also suggests that items from Taiwan are traded to Cagayan Valley rather than a widespread and fundamental elements of material culture as in Batanes. • Slate artifacts have never been found in the Philippines south of Batanes.

  20. The reporters • Viernes, Michael Jan • Tagudin, Mary Grace Mae • Arcenal, Rhea • Clave, Carol Eve • Mate’, Alfie Mariane

More Related