1 / 15

Joint Action on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting

Joint Action on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting. Work Package 3. Evaluation of the Joint Action. Finland. M.Vallimies-Patomaki, J.Lammintakanen Brussels – April 12, 2013. Agenda of the WP3 kick-off meeting. Introduction of WP3 partners Scope and objectives of WP3 Deliverables

elden
Download Presentation

Joint Action on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Action on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting Work Package 3 Evaluation of the Joint Action Finland M.Vallimies-Patomaki, J.Lammintakanen Brussels – April 12, 2013

  2. Agenda of the WP3 kick-off meeting • Introduction of WP3 partners • Scope and objectives of WP3 • Deliverables • Preparation of the evaluation strategy • Discussion topics

  3. Core team 3 • Dr Marjukka Vallimies-Patomäki, WP leader, • Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland • Mr Jesmond Sharples, WP Co-leader, • Ministry of Health, Malta • Prof. Juha Kinnunen, Senior Management Scientist, • University of Eastern Finland, Finland • Prof. Johanna Lammintakanen, Management Scientist, • University of Eastern Finland, Finland

  4. Partners • DG SANCO D2/EU, EAHC/EU • Ministry of Social Affairs and Health/FI, Ministry of Health/MT, Ministry of Public Health/BE, Ministry of Health/PL, Ministry of Health/SK • University of Eastern Finland/FI, Medical University of Varna/BG, NCPHA/BG, University of Bremen/DE, Semmelweis University/HU • CfWI/UK • EFN, EHMA

  5. Scope and objectives • WP3 provides a systematic approach • for the internal evaluation of the Joint Action • Aim is to verify if the JA is being implemented as • planned and achieving the objectives: • - output evaluation is to verify • compliance to achievement of the objectives • -outcome evaluation is to assess • usefulness of outcomes, recommendations and • sustainability beyond the Joint Action • - process evaluation is to ensure • compliance to the rules and implementation

  6. Engagementof the member states and stakeholders • Mentoring group: • - WP leaders and representatives of stakeholders • - Discussing and giving feedback of the evaluation strategy • Expert reference groups: • - Representatives of member states and stakeholders • - Discussing and appraising the quality of the deliverables • Focus groups: • - Representatives of member states and stakeholders • - Appraising the impact and sustainability of the JA

  7. Deliverables • Evaluation strategy and evaluation tools,August 2013 • Expert reference group report, November 2014 • Intermediate evaluation report, January 2015 • Expert reference group report, December 2015 • Final evaluation report,March 2016

  8. Schedule for the preparation of the evaluation strategy • 1 st draft by April 30/Commission & WP1 • Basic contents and evaluation indicators • Comments by May 22 • Evaluation indicators and spesific objectives: consultation through teleconference/Commission, WP1 &WP leaders • 2 nd draft by June 7 /Commission, WP1 & WP leaders • Comments by June 19(Dates changed by WP3) • Stakeholder analysis, in collaboration with WP2 (> into an appendix) • 3 rd version by June 30/Commission, WP1, WP leaders, partners, strategic stakeholders • Comments by July 31 • Final version to WP1 by August to be submitted to EB

  9. Materials and methods

  10. Review of spesific objectives • Spesific • Spesify the target group and the factors that need to be • changed • Measurable • Formulate objectives in a measurable format • Appropriate • Make sure objectives are acchievable, attainable, • acceptable for the target group • Realistic • Ensure that you can realisticly acchieve the objectives given the project resources • Timebound • Connect objectives to a timeline

  11. Key performance indicators • Ensure that WP leaders are involved in identifying KPIs for all WPs of the JA • KPI help the JA define and measure progress toward desired outcomes • KPIs are quantifiable (measurable) measurements, agreed to beforehand, that reflect the critical success factors of the JA School: graduation rates of the studentsSocial service organization: the number of clients assisted during the year • Source: www.management.about.com.

  12. Overview of the discussion topics • Evaluation tools: • Find examples and experiences • Spesific objectives and evaluation indicators : • Review in collaboration with Commision, WP1 and WP leaders • Stakeholder analysis: • In collaboration with WP2 • Preparation of the evaluation strategy: • In collaboration with Commission, WP1, WP leaders, University of Bremen etc.

  13. Evaluation process: in co-operation with all WPs 14 Output evaluation (WP2,4,5,6,7) Compliance to the content ACHIEVEMENT OF THE JA OBJECTIVES, IMPLEMENTATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE JA 2016 Each WP’s objectives Deliverable: Final report (> EB) 2013: SETTING OBJECTIVES FOR THE JA AND WPs ”…to create a platform for collaboration and exchange between MSs to better prepere for the future of the health workforce” Outcome evaluation (+WP2,6,7) Lessons learnt and recommendations Process evaluation (+ WP 1) Compliance to the rules Interim report > EB

  14. Thank you for your attention !

More Related